Thread by @ThyConsigliori

1) It appears that @GenFlynn may be attending a conference about Digital Warriors, and one in which the topic of Q will be discussed. I think there's still a bit of uncertainty, but something I believe we may think we know, is that he wants to go. If so, that matters.

@GenFlynn 2) Having been so long a publicly stated Non-supporter of Q, all my hashtag work - and especially in the #PardonFlynnNow movement - has avoided the topic as if it were the plague. All my Q-supporting friends have tolerated this in me, and laughed at me for it.

@GenFlynn 3) On the other hand, many stated clearly that the two movements must be clearly separate, and that any conflation would be wrong. I've thanked them for this, and that's been my rule...until now. At this point it is impossible to maintain the wall for the reason above, and more.

@GenFlynn 4) Not being a Q follower, I don't know when WWG1WGA began to be connected with it, and for those of you who don't know, it stands for Where We Go One We Go All. It's an absolutely lovely sentiment, and if it is actually a value with real execution, it is mighty.

@GenFlynn 5) It is beyond question that Gen Flynn has incorporated this into his signature when signing books. It's such a wonderful sentiment that I've always withheld judgment of what it conveys, and I'm not going to speculate now. What I need to hear are his public words on topic.

@GenFlynn 6) Let's turn to the Q "thing" itself for a moment. In my analysis this morning, something struck me. One would NOT have to buy into its prophetic, or we're deep inside the government type of presentation, while NOT rejecting its mission. There is a part of its mission I love.

@GenFlynn 7) I love the digital warriors part of the mission. My conclusion is this. We can all disagree about methods - and I often do! - but honor must be given when purpose and mission are in any way aligned. That's just a normal squabble between friends.

@GenFlynn 8) So, please allow me the nuanced statement that I 100% the Digital Warriors vision. I'll qualify, I believe we need other kinds of teams, too, but Digital Warriors are awesome, a brilliant idea, and if we all go together where America needs us to go, all will be well.

@GenFlynn 9) On that note, I have to mention Jocko Willink's book Extreme Ownership. I'm in the Decentralized Command chapter right now, and Jocko has answered a long standing question for me, it's something Digital Warriors need to contemplate. How do you organize your efforts?

@GenFlynn 10) Over decades of studying small, high performance teams, the number I'd arrived at was a maximum of 9 members, 1 leader and 8 followers. Jocko explains that that is still too many. His number is 4 - 6 members, maximum, with 1 clear leader, the others followers.

@GenFlynn 11) The real epiphany he gave me was that the unit will face opposition. Leadership cannot be extended, in real time, in the face of opposition beyond that number. And it hit me, while in the rest of life we usually don't face bullets, we do face opposition at every turn.

@GenFlynn 12) To the degree I understand where our Digital Army is today, I don't see any such structure in place. And, I'm sure most would resist it, as Digital Warriors tend to happily work right by themselves alone, at will, like pioneers in the Digital West. I respect that.

@GenFlynn 13) Yet, every endeavor requires some corps, often an elite, that shoulders a very different kind of mission, one where leadership, planning, coordination, and most of all, assessment of failures and learning, learning and change, are driven purposefully.

@GenFlynn 14) My own published target is #100kMAGALeaders. I envision very literally local teams, on the ground, who very literally meet together, face to face. What Jocko's helped me with is reducing the total number of participants downward, and that's a very good thing!

@GenFlynn 15) I still believe in the number of teams, 100,000. But, reducing recruitment targets from 800 - 900k, down to 400 - 600k is greatly comforting! Now, question: could it be that the Digital Warriors mission and my vision might combine and serve each other? Why not?

@GenFlynn 16) So, here's my next question. Will someone rise to take a leadership roll in the Digital Warriors world, one that would be recognized by all you Q people out there? Yes, I know, you want Gen Flynn to do that. But, might there be someone at a slightly lower level on the chain?

@GenFlynn 17) And yes again, I know, the plan must be hidden from the enemy. I get it. Still, no matter how mysterious you wish to be, someone has to come into the light of day and publish objectives. That's why we actually declare war in the real world. Wars benefit from declaration.

@GenFlynn 18) All of which brings me back to my perpetual theme, the pardon. I've said it again and again, if your plan gets us the real world results we need without a pardon, I'm all in. I just remain skeptical of anything that costs so much as one more day. I have zero patience left.

@GenFlynn 19) And, if it happens, I'll be beyond THRILLED to hear Gen Flynn's presentation at a Digital Warriors conference. Thrilled. But what I want, and what I believe America needs, is complete reunion between Flynn and @realDonaldTrump, as public friends and allies.

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 20) To me, anything other than a complete reunification of their forces misses the target. And, I want that to occur before the glaring lights of the world's media. I want a handshake and a hug. A great big bear hug. I want them both to speak, and state the mission.

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 21) I want Trump-world's lackeys, soothsayers and advisers to quiver in their bespoke shoes, knowing the General Flynn has returned. His name is not Michael by chance. Unleashed, he is the avenging angel you do not want to target you in his sights.

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 22) Here's an example. As I've said, I like AG Barr. I do not trust him, however. He let Comey go. I was questioning him with all that lovey dovey Rod Rosenstein maneuvering. Sorry. Not a good beginning. Now, throw a newly re-empowered Gen Flynn at the DOJ. Picture that!

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 23) It it was up to me, the first mission I'd task him on would be the Epstein case, as I've said before. The minions and cockroaches of the Swamp reach between New York City and D.C. as fast the Acela train. Do you follow my point?

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 24) This situation needs a real resolution, not a make shift one. The courts have so debased their execution of justice, they can't be trusted. The Swamp benefits from every single day of Gen Flynn's silence. And, even if cleared, by law, will he be cleared by politics?

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump 25) Which brings me back to the fundamental premise. ONLY a presidential pardon actually restores Gen Flynn to his proper position of national leadership as the public friend of the President, and ally of America, Herself.

#PardonFlynnNow

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump UPDATE - UPDATE - UPDATE

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1162706023267950592?s=20