Congress imposed limitations on use of Title X funds. The regs were held constitutional by #SCOTUS 30 years ago.
Yet, according to nearly every #Dem spreading their lies and legs for the #presidentialnomination, the rule is "unethical" and women will lose access to contraception and basic health services.
Second, that 700k voting block CANNOT vote as though all were in a single district entitled to select from amongst themselves a member as their delegate to the Congress.
Rather, each, to the extent they exercise the right to vote, does so as an ABSENTEE VOTER of his/her own home district.
More to the point, what do you care if the government identifies individuals with an autism spectrum disorder who may benefit from treatments that are currently being developed?
What do you care if the US Government -- whom you hold accountable for voodoo foods and dyes being in the American diet -- takes a rational step in beginning to understand the problems, including possible environmental causes, of autism?
Do you remember "right to try"?
I do.
I support the right to try. And not just the right to try Big Pharma, but those medical or other healing approaches that, to your mind, are most conducive to the restoration of your health.
In #1850, the federal #Congress enacted the #FugitiveSlaveAct.
Under the law, escaped persons would be recaptured in Free States and returned to their enslavement in the South. More, aiding the escapees became a FEDERAL CRIME punishable by fine and or imprisonment.
It is a true, but little-known, anecdote of the #GreatTyrant, #AbrahamLincoln, litigated fugitive slave cases under the #FugitiveSlaveAct. Lincoln represented a slave owner seeking to recover his "property."
The act was not popular or well-received at the time. Compromises are difficult to make when one does not recognize the equal human dignity of others. Many Northern States did nothing to further the recapturing of fugitive slaves or did not do so until compelled by order.
@elonmusk @CommunityNotes Would your views on the propriety of such courts change if the Court's religious identity was Jewish? United Kingdom has both Sharia courts and Beth din, or rabbinical courts. No person can be made subject to their jurisdiction except under terms of England's arbitration Act.
@elonmusk @CommunityNotes Also, take care and thinking that parallel systems of adjudication are necessarily dangerous to societal advancement. Many a plaintiff would happily get rid of mandatory arbitration, which of course is also extrajudicial.
@elonmusk @CommunityNotes Here, in the US , We have addressed these issues fairly handily in the United States by allowing individuals the freedom to arrange their relationships in this manner while guaranteeing their right to step away from any religion or its obligation.
The notion of a general amnesty for misconduct alleged by failure to register or by failure to report when called to serve -- which was granted in fact by #JimmyCarter -- could guide your actions on behalf of #J6PoliticalPrisoners.
Did @FaniWillis instruct #nathanwade to lie about #WhiteHouse meetings? Did she know he'd be lying about those meetings in court beforehand?
Did she warn the Court?
Did she report to the @StateBarofGA?
@amuse @FaniWillis @StateBarofGA What might interest the Georgia Bar about the conduct of the Fulton County Prosecutor's Office? Why might disbarment be appropriate for all attorneys working in the FCDA's office?
@amuse @FaniWillis @StateBarofGA For 40 years, I have studied, practiced, and taught law. I have assisted in defense of #barcounsel and #judicialconduct investigations on several occasions.