Let's assume for the sake of argument that I am OCD & obsessing on imaginary fascism.
For the sake of my obsession I am defining neoliberalism, feeding the rich ruling elites & starving the poor, as fascism, also using Mussolini's definition of corporate state (& he defined it).
When did this obsession start?
I see nothing in the Whitlam years (at least until the coup) & certainly nothing from the government.
Fraser was surprising benign, so that takes us to 1983.
Jumping now to 2014ish the Coalition government is madly destroying everything I held dear.
That is the point at which I became aware of this imaginary obsession, when I thought “Abbott is not behaving like someone who is never going to stand for election again, so he must be assuming that there won’t be an election”. “What does this imply?” thought I.
My conclusion at that time was that the barbarian Coalition wrecking balls must be destroying the nation for someone, & who else could benefit from a quarry nation with no employment controls or welfare security?
I didn’t have to look too far to see the corporate oligarchs pouring money into the politician’s coffers, the same oligarchs who gratefully accepted the public services from the government for them to profit & pillage.
That was the point where I began to be affected by this imaginary paranoid delusion of fascism. I even tweeted “Is it possible to have fascism in a democracy?” 2014 or 2015.
I then started looking back to see how & when it might have started.
One point of democracy is the checks & balances on the government, major ones being “Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition” & the “Free Press”, the 4th Estate.
For fascism to take hold one or both of those two must have been missing.
Now, Australia hasn’t had a Free Press at any time in the period we are looking at, so all it would have taken is the Opposition to abdicate their constitutional responsibility & either appease or actively support those that they had been elected to oppose.
So, returning to the beginning of the period in question, 1983.
Hawke has just been made P.M. & Keating his Treasurer.
A couple of unusual things happened, [previous ACTU Secretary] Hawke brought in the Accords that disadvantaged unions & Keating privatised the Commonwealth Bank.
At the time they were odd, a bit confusing, but nothing too way out, just “Why would a Labor government do that?” “Maybe they know something that we don’t”, we had no reason to distrust a Labor government, after all the previous one was Whitlam.
In hindsight, that was the introduction of Neoliberalism [= Fascism, remember] into mainstream Australia. They did other things, some good, but for the point of this saga, they opened the door to Howard & the hard core card carrying Neoliberals to do with us whatever they wished.
Howard then continued merrily wrecking Australian economy & society for several years until he was finally chucked out on his ear & a grateful nation was rescued by a Labor government.
Now was Labor’s chance to set everything to rights, but they were too busy brawling & passing their own neoliberal laws to do anything democratic.
Put single parents on Newstart, refuse to bring Newstart up to poverty level, introduce #robodebt, all sorts of stuff like that.
But now we come to the Abbott/Turnbull/Morrison/Dutton/Pezzullo government with wrecking balls swinging in all directions, everything & its dog handed over to oligarchs. Now is Labor’s chance to shine, to oppose.
What do Labor do to oppose this barbarian fascist regime?
They support every single nasty party fascist police state anti-democratic law that the Coalition raises.
That is why I have this OCD paranoid obsession about imaginary fascists
Suppose that you were a powerful rich person with powerful rich friends who want to take power over literally everything.
What would be the first step?
I suggest buying those who currently have power in each area you to wish to control, the governments & the press.
⬇
⬆You need the press, the mass media, because they control everything that the people think they know. They have always pushed their own barrows, their owner's interests, they can easily rejig to your needs which are almost identical.
Next the government:
⬇
⬆Government is your main local power, they control the police, armed forces, ministerial paramilitary.
National governments in particular are a rich greedy person's wet dream. They can create literally unlimited funds & they can write laws to allow them to give them to you.
⬇
I am concerned with what I see as the usurping, undermining, destruction of Democracy in Australia.
This has been caused by a convergence of partisan politics.
Let me explain in a long & boring monologue about the most critical element of Australian politics. #auspol
⬇
⬆Basically, in brief, Australian politics has yielded to the anti-democratic fascistic right that have taken over both major parties, the Liberals & Labor.
This story has its roots back in Second World War fascist Austria & features the Murdoch family at all stages. #auspol
⬇
⬆That sets my basis, now to the fundamentals of Australian politics, that which underlies the Constitution, the assumption of democracy & all that is necessary to support & nourish it. #auspol
⬇
@DoctorKarl Energy is neither created nor destroyed.
From Earth's point of view, any energy coming to us from the Sun stays in the Earth's system, land, sea, atmosphere as heat until it re-radiates into space.
The CO₂ in the atmosphere now trapping the heat will be here 1000 years.
@DoctorKarl Perhaps people might reasonably think the Earth will cool off like a cup of tea.
Heat goes into the ocean, so maybe the Earth cools off.
No
The system, cup of tea/Earth can only cool when its heat leaves the system.
The CO₂ is a thermos keeping the Earth warm for 1000 years.
@DoctorKarl The CO₂ already in the atmosphere will still be trapping new heat energy as long as it is in the atmosphere, until it is removed as vegetation or shells. That is where the 1000 years comes from.
Stop adding more CO₂ & things will equilibrate somewhat warmer than they are now.
For those who find it hard to accept Modern Monetary Theory’s claims that currency sovereign nations with fiat currencies are unconstrained in the amount of their currency that they can create, & that they do not fund their spending from tax or bonds or anywhere
A thread:
In my sovereign castle/home, say I set up a monetary system whereby I issue the kids with hand written notes of exchange for the chores they do, that they can exchange for treats or privileges from me.
They can trade these notes, let’s call them Relph$, amongst themselves.
To make sure that they need to use my currency I impose a tax upon them of so many Relph$ per year with actual penalties should they fail to pay them.
The taxes that I receive from them I securely destroy so the little buggers can’t double dip.
One way to consider a fiat currency is like me issuing Relph$ to my kids for chores so they can trade between themselves for treats.
If I (as Relph$ sovereign) need to spend more Relph$, I just write on more pieces of paper, I don't need to get them back from the kids first. #MMT
>>#MMT ( above)
Likewise as a Relph$ sovereign, I can tax the kids so many Relph$ with penalties for default to ensure that they comply with the system.
Those Relph$ I get from tax just go in a secure bin, I don't need them to spend/create new ones. I can spend as many as I like.
>>#MMT (above)
If I want a more modern system I don't even have to write on bits of paper, I could just put entries in a spreadsheet.
Then when I tax my Relph$ I just deduct numbers from the spreadsheet, exactly like happens with the A$ or the US$ or £Sterling etc.