Nick Fuentes is worse for a true Nationalistic movement than Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk spews donor class talking points. Nick Fuentes spews (a couple of) our talking points while still advocating an unconditional vote. This is not how power works. Power is not requesting
that an elite class adopt your points. Power is replacing the party that will not represent you, just as they (the ones in power) are replacing us for not meeting their demands (working for peanuts). We will NEVER gain ground with unconditional votes. This is negotiation 101.
You may as well walk into a car dealership and say “ok, so I’m gonna buy this car no matter what, but I really think you should lower the price $2,000 and give me the heated leather.” There is no in incentive for them to meet your demands.
The donors are not scared of the groypers, they win either way with an unconditional vote. The same can be said for “optics”. Optics are an appeal to objective observers so your talking points seem palatable. This again is not how power is gained.
The donor class does not care how well you are dressed or if you’re holding a rosary, they care about power, and the objective normie is irrelevant. You don’t beat a competitor by asking for help. We must reject the establishment and create an alternative.
The GOP will NEVER stop immigration, there is no incentive when their donors are happy. They will never sacrifice the very thing that empowers them when people give them unconditional votes. In the end Charlie, with the backing of donors, is speaking for Trump.
Its clear Nick doesn’t grasp power. He is going about this with a very immature and low IQ (wink) consumerist/Capitalist mindset. He thinks if enough people get mad at Charlie, and the sentiment spreads, the ones in power will capitulate. This is the same mentality
people who leave bad Yelp reviews at McDonals have so they can get a free meal next time they go. In fact its even dumber. Its like saying “I’ll still eat here even though your fries are too salty” instead of “I will eat at your competitor unless you correct this.”
Real progress is going to be slow and we have to fight and claw for every inch. We will not be able to walk up to the counter and complain to a cashier, its absurd to think otherwise. Until And until Nick Fuentes unblocks and engages critics, he shouldn’t be thought of as
anything other than an attention seeking child. He’s the GOP version of David Hogg.
I keep getting asked in this thread “what are your solutions then”
We will not be effective in politics until infrastructure is laid out for us to receive funds and organize. We need credit unions, NGOs, and alt-tech/media. We will not gain ground on an enemies platform.
We will not be effective in politics until infrastructure is laid out for us to receive funds and organize. We need credit unions, NGOs, and alt-tech/media. We will not gain ground on an enemies platform.
I know that is a long way away. But Nick has a strong following, he could wake up tomorrow and start looking up all the names and addresses of the pro-immigration donors, start calling for a boycott of their goods and services, organizing groypers to
start digging in these people’s personal lives, start calling their family and friends from high school to find dirt on them, etc. These are the things our enemies do to us. It works, it would be 100x more effective than the Q&A thing. Make lists, take the action we can until
our infrastructure develops more. We need a counter punch to SPLC and ADL slander and lawsuits. They have “hate lists” so why don’t we?
@heywildrich (in law school) has been talking about an ADL or SPLC for “us”, submitting amicus briefs, etc. Stuff I don’t see anyone else doing.
He has a Patreon
patreon.com/Rich711/posts
Give him a look and PLEASE post links to others doing similar things.
He has a Patreon
patreon.com/Rich711/posts
Give him a look and PLEASE post links to others doing similar things.
