It's absolutely possible to create an environment where worker safety and the human rights of people with #disability are not placed at odds with each other.
Dr Spivakovsky makes the point that people without disability can get frustrated and angry, or behave in a way other people don't like, without anybody using that as a reason to tie them down or sedate them.
Prof Sally Robinsons is @SalRob310 - her research is about people with disability being able to have the same kinds of flourishing lives as anyone else, and what gets in the way of this.
@SalRob310 She is explaining the "multi-dimensional framework of abuse" - the role of different people and relationships, the role of systems and organisations like group homes, and the role of wider social and cultural concepts that interact with how people experience abuse.
Talking about Jan Daisley now - one of our founding members and former president. Prof Robinson says Jan would be front and centre of #OurRoyalCommission if she was alive.
Robinson is now talking about safety strategies, and a model of how people with #disability understand safety. Four aspects to safety: 1) being physically safe, 2) being emotionally safe, 3) feeling capable and 4) having your access needs met.
Being emotionally safe is about having respectful relationships with others, people you can trust. Feeling capable is about feeling listened to and like you have influence over what happens in your life.
The Chair asks for more information about the PhD work. Prof Robinson explains more about her work and the participants, who had faced emotional and psychological abuse across various settings.
Prof Robinson specifies the way she defined abuse and harm. #DisabilityRC
Prof Robinson goes on to describe a few instances of disregard and neglect of people with disabilities that she found during her research.
In terms of difference between residents and citizens: 'residents' are expected to be compliant, and not know much about abuse or neglect they may be enduring or have the ability to complain. Sally says this lack of knowledge about types of abuse extends to staff.
Prof Robinson discusses what she hopes to see out of the commission. Says she would like to see specialist processes in place to capture the stories of people with complex needs and backgrounds.
She mentions that there is very little said about the violence that people with disability experience from family and carers, and hopes the commission will address it.
Prof Robinson also discusses the power structures in services, and the difficulty that exists for people with disability who may want to file complaints.
Prof Robinson finishes up by stating that this is a broader community issue. That we need to build awareness and skill in taking action when people see abuse and neglect in the community.
We're particularly looking today at the function of "guardian of last resort." That's someone who Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) appoints to make decisions for some people with disability, like where they live.
(Needless to say there ought to be more resources for people with disability, particularly intellectual disability, to be supported to make their own decisions, rather than having someone make decisions for them.)
Guardians, Dr Pearce says, "where possible respect a person's wishes," but primarily act in their "best interests," (as determined by the guardian themselves, of course), and often have "very limited choices" about where they can let someone live.
At this point, we are adjourning until 2:35 so we can all watch the #DisabilityAwards2019 - after which the #DisabilityRoyalCommission will be "returning to a human rights framework," which we left for some reason? Thanks for that one, Ms Eastman.
The values of the Public Advocate's office have moved from a focus on protecting people to a focus on upholding their rights. Dr Pearce and Ms Eastman are discussing how the #CRPD has affected the office.
Now talking about the difference between looking at someone's "best interests" (as mentioned earlier) and trying to reflect their "will and preference."
Eastman's questioning is now pivoting back to group homes and de-institutionalisation (yes, in case you're wondering, that word is going in our jargon buster)
Pearce says "one-size-fits-all is the wrong paradigm." Making people live together, eat the same food, go to bed at the same time is not reflective of human dignity and choice, and contributes to violence in group homes.
Dr Pearce says during NDIS rollout there was a lot of pressure to get a lot of people plans very quickly, which is why a lot of people ended up with identical so-called "individualised" plans.
Pearce: One of the missing pieces is, "What do Boards of disability support organisations actually know" about what goes on in their group homes? How are they held accountable for it?
Bit of an understatement to say Yooralla has had "serious issues". Dr Pearce is now speaking approvingly of the changes they've made since then, co-design etc.
She says it can't work unless residents live in an environment where they can speak up.
Pearce: There is no engagement with people in these houses about who they might live with. Accommodation is so limited there is often no choice. But it's not appropriate to have e.g. a victim and perpetrator continuing to live in the same house.
[This is really bringing home how important affordable accessible housing is to the disability community. You can't have choice and control if there aren't enough houses to go around - an artificial scarcity which the government could absolutely do something about.] #DisabilityRC
Pearce: The new model says Community Visitors can't visit unless it's an SDA (which is #NDIS Specialist Disability Accommodation).
She said Community Visitors are sometimes all people have in terms of enforcing their rights.
Pearce: If nobody goes to a SIL (which is private group home not getting #NDIS SDA funding) except people who work there, there's no human rights monitoring, abuse can go unchecked.
Sometimes disability support workers do call up the Public Advocate as whistleblowers, but they mostly depend on Community Visitors to observe human rights abuses.
Chair Sackville asks if there are resources for paid Community Visitors. Pearce says Victoria has a long volunteering tradition, but some states might find a paid model works better, e.g. due to large distances.
Commissioner McEwin asks about the culture in group homes. Dr Pearce says there is widespread disempowerment. People feel that management has all the power and they have none.
(However, if staff are routinely ignoring clearly stated decisions of people with disability who live in group homes, that doesn't bode well for integrating supported decision-making.)
Roche says his approach as a Visitor is to think about how he'd feel if he lived in that group home. Masterson adds that they both have a perspective as members of their local communities.
Roche echoes Pearce's statement about service providers'reluctance to show them incident reports, and how there are often things described in staff logbooks that don't make it into an incident report at all.
Masterson agrees, describing an incident in which a person with disability banged his head against a window hard enough to break it, and it wasn't recorded aside from a brief note in the daily log, because it was considered normal behaviour.
She adds that now reports are increasingly computerised it's harder to get access to them - e.g. sometimes a staff member only has access to things they themselves submitted, can't show them any other reports.
Commissioner McEwin asks how seriously management take these incident reports. Masterson says sometimes the report section on management response is completely blank.
Eastman asks about when people who live in a group home tell CVs about an incident and there's no record of it. Both CVs say there have been incidents of that.
Eastman asks if staff have been cooperative, open and transparent. Roche says yes, in some cases, when staff have been there a number of years and built up a relationship with him.
Roche says she often goes into houses and all the staff are casual staff who may be there for the first time that day - they don't know what's been going on.
Eastman asks about other issues with staff casualisation. Roche says casual staff don't know the people who live there as well. Masterson adds that casual staff also have less training, sometimes extremely minimal induction.
Both witnesses are now talking about how many houses have routine maintenance put off for a long time, e.g. a noisy heater keeping people awake at night for two winters in a row or a light fitting broken for six months.
Roche says it's very difficult to get an issue escalated to a point where something might be done about it - the Office of the Public Advocate doesn't have the resources to build a lot of cases, and has no power itself to force anyone to do anything about issues.
Roche says the Community Visitor program needs to be protected. Masterson agrees that some kind of independent oversight is vital. She also wants an overhaul of the incident report system in group homes.
Getting ready to live tweet the last day of the #DisabilityRC hearing into the use of psychotropic medication and chemical restraints.
It's been a tough week, so if you need to mute this thread of the hashtag, we do understand.
If you feel impacted by anything you read here today, remember you can always call Lifeline on 13 11 14.
You can also call the National Counselling and Referral Service (specifically set up to support people impacted by anything related to the #DisabilityRC) on 1800 421 468.
We have been very disappointed so far with the lack of people with disability giving evidence at this hearing, and we'd like to start this thread today by sharing three blogs written for us by people with lived experience of the mental health system. #DisabilityRC
Getting ready to live tweet the #DisabilityRC again this morning. Thanks to everyone following along this week. Some of the testimony is confronting to hear, and we appreciate everyone engaging with us this week.
As always, if you need support, you can reach Lifeline on 13 11 14.
You can also call the National Counselling and Referral Service, set up to support anyone impacted by anything related to the #DisabilityRC, on 1800 421 468.
@FrancesPWDA is live tweeting this morning's #DisabilityRC sessions. You can follow the thread here:
It's day 2 of the Disability Royal Commission into "the use of psychotropic medication, behaviour support and behaviours of concern". We'll be live tweeting from here again today using the hashtag #DisabilityRC
We heard some harrowing testimony yesterday and we encourage everyone to look after yourselves as we go through this together.
We invite you to follow along on the journey with us, but also remember you can temporarily mute the hashtag or a thread if you need to. #DisabilityRC
@FrancesPWDA will be live tweeting for us from her account this morning. Check out the thread here:
The 6th Disability Royal Commission hearing on "the use of psychotropic medication, behaviour support and behaviours of concern" starts today at 10am, and we will be live tweeting the proceedings from here.
We'll be using the hashtag #DisabilityRC if you'd like to join us.