Thread by @DanWoy

I’m genuinely baffled at how the Conservative establishment can conclude that the only shortcoming with the party’s climate change “plan” in #elxn43 was that they didn’t talk about it (well) enough. e.g. Hamish Marshall on @TheHerleBurly

https://twitter.com/TheHerleBurly/status/1209489329422323712?s=20

1/ #cdnpoli

@LisaRaitt on @CANADALAND @OPPOcast canadalandshow.com/podcast/49-lis… ). I wonder whether @Baird review will challenge the merits (or lack thereof) of the CPC approach more substantively? I hope so. The plan was poorly conceived talking more about it would have simply... 2/ #cdnpoli

@OPPOcast @Baird …shone a brighter light on the fact it would INCREASE carbon pollution per @MarkJaccard analysis (amongst others) policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/augu… #elxn43 results—& plenty of opinion research (e.g. see threadreaderapp.com/thread/1192884…)—suggests a credible #climatechange plan is a pre-req 3/

…to win an election & govern Canada. I sincerely hope to see more Conservatives crack this open (e.g. see @YaroslavB on carbon pricing policymagazine.ca/ten-lessons-fo… & pre-election advice from @DavidMcLA policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/apri…) & some leadership candidates advocate a new approach. 4/4