, 8 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
This excellent piece on the history and sources of US economic development and growth should be more widely read, especially in Washington. One thing that stands out, contrary to much public perception that sees US success as the inevitable consequence...
academic.oup.com/past/advance-a…
...of its free-market orientation, is the crucial role of a strong and interventionist state sector that “harnessed, managed and manipulated markets”, rather than simply establish them and let them operate freely.

They “cajoled, nudged and pushed private interests in...
...economically desired directions by tying ‘carrots’ — subsidies, protection and incentives – to the ‘discipline’ of demands such as moving investment towards industrial development and technological upgrading, which capitalists, despite their much inflated reputation as...
...‘risk-takers’, did only reluctantly.”

This is probably true by the way of most or all rapidly developing economies, including of course China in the past 3-4 decades, but here is where they part ways. The state sector in the US was never monolithic, and was always subject...
...to pressure from powerful independent institutions and to major shifts between local and central power and from group to group. US institutions, including political institutions, were constantly involved in a very messy adjustment process as rapid development created new...
...conditions which made increasingly obsolete the very institutions that had led to this rapid development.

This seems briefly to have been the case in China too, during the 1990s and early 2000s, but at some point in the few years after the 2008 Olympics, it seems that...
...Beijing turned against tolerating this messy adjustment process. We'll see what comes next. If messy institutional adjustment is a necessary condition for continued growth, as I expect it is, we’ll need to see a lot more political toleration of the adjustment process in...
...China.

None of this is new, of course, to readers of the brilliant Albert Hirschman. In case anyone is interested, I wrote my own thoughts about what US economic history can tell us about China seven years ago:
carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!