HB1722 isn’t an autism bill. It’s an ABA industry bill (an industry that autistic people who’ve gone through it have strong objections to).
@pwcdanica isn’t evil. She isn’t being malicious. She’s a smart, empathetic, much-needed official.
So, what happened? Let me explain.
ABA (as applied to us) operates on false assumptions about autistic people. That’s the root of why it so often causes such damage and trauma. Yet, it’s promoted by leading autism groups. Why?
Well, those groups were built with good intent but not with autistic people. So...
The majority of *leading* autism groups exclude us from their leadership and staff (occasionally we’ll get a token or two). So, those groups themselves are built on false assumptions about autistic people as well. It’s a design flaw.
And it’s these groups which push these bills.
Most folks have little understanding of disabled people as community. We’re seen as individuals with individual conditions. Alas, like any marginalized group, we find each other to form community, culture & consensus. The consensus of the autistic community is against this bill.
Being empathetic to that, consider that politicians work on A LOT of issues (check out @pwcdanica’s twitter thread to see her amazing amount of work). So, they rely on stakeholders to inform them.
So, when an autism group approaches you, a good politician listens.
So, what we have are autism groups saying “this is consensus”. But, what they don’t tell the politician is that it is the consensus of their non-autistic board and staff, or of their funders, or of the pet priorities of their founders. They forget to mention us - autistic people.
And then, the politician hears their message amplified by parents of autistic children in their district (their constituents). The ABA industry and autism groups have ensured there are few other options for parents. That’s all they’re repeatedly told. That’s all the know...
So, of course they are going to be supportive. Of course. They see their child progressing while in ABA. They don’t know much of that would have happened without ABA, or that their child could have been better helped in other ways. They don’t yet know the long-term effects.
And some of these ABA professionals are amazing, empathetic people. Parents see that. They also see these people routinely leave because of poor support training and poor pay. They want to solve the revolving door problem which they see.
They’re then told that to solve that problem, more government support and authorization of ABA is needed. So, they heed the call of autism groups and lobby politicians for that. Yet, ABA therapists leave because of ethical problems as poor practice within the ABA industry itself.
So, if you’re a politician like @pwcdanica and you have autism groups and parents coming to you to say “Please write this bill,” what do you do? You write the damn bill.
So, what do we do?
If you are autisic, speak up. If you are a constituent of @pwcdanica, contact her. Meet with her. Thank her for her amazing leadership and empathy. Show her a better way.
We can criticize, but we need to help. That’s step one. That’s the triage to fix the immediate situation.
Step two is the deeper work, the urgent work. It’s making the case every day that autistic people must be centered in every group or program which purports to be about us. Period.
Autistic people must control our own narrative. We must be empowered to lead. This is about us.
Until we do that, autistics, parents, and empathetic politicians like @pwcdanica will continue to be victimized by this frame. Our outcomes, access & normalcy will continue to suffer.
We’ve been in this loop for too long. How many hundreds of millions of dollars must we waste?
So, support @pwcdanica into deeper understanding. That’s the short-term fix. If anyone’s up for it, she is. However, our drumbeat of work must be on centering autistic people. That’s systemic change. Until we do that, we’ll be doing this short term work over & over again. #GoTeam
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone wrote that Judge Amy Coney Barrett would bring “heart” to ‘special needs’ if confirmed to the #SupremeCourt. After showing my respect for the person who wrote that, and understanding of where they were coming from, this was my response:
“Disabled people don’t need lawmakers or jurors to bring “heart” to ‘special needs’. That’s what has led to patronizing policy which has f%¥ked over the exercise of our equality and marginalized our full participation in society over-and-over-and-over again...
It’s one of the greatest things we organize and fight against and we will continue to fight against it until the law and policy makers recognize that we are just like everyone else...
The whole #BobWoodward thing reminds me that our better politicians understand the press will try to ‘get’ them, and that’s a good, healthy thing for our democracy. They respect and welcome that.
—> It’s a BS check.
Bad politicians think the press is there to serve them.
*I should say it’s not as much that the press tries to “get” politicians, but that they don’t regard a politician’s messaging priorities when they are reporting stories. That’s an amazing thing, and when I was a press officer it drove me up the wall.
I hated it, but I loved it.
And the #BobWoodward tapes remind me of #LouChibarro of the @WashBlade. When I was a press officer, he was so masterful in asking a question, letting you answer, then NOT SAYING ANYTHING.
The subject felt compelled to fill the silence with more information.
👨🍳💋
So, while I very much *feel* #SpoonTheory in my being, it all falls apart when trying to use it as a metaphor with others (or as an accommodation strategy for myself). I constantly miscount and lose them.
When speaking, or in meetings, I’m often asked by folks to explain spoon theory. I usually just turn to someone I trust and ask “Could you explain it?”
For myself, I’ve learned to just make myself stop, slow down, or turn down requests when needed — and to be ok with that.
I mean, I’m a huge supporter of spoon theory as a metaphor to explain things to others and as an accomodation peoole can use themselves. It just all gets tangled and anxiety-inducing for me.
I love to laugh at that, though. You kind of gotta.
I often think on how research, medicine, and psychiatry approach and ‘treat’ autistic people today in the exact same manner they approached and ‘treated’ homosexuality until 1972.
Then, thanks to #LGBTQ advocates, homosexuality was suddenly ‘cured’ by @APAPsychiatric overnight.
Where are the endless research papers about the genetics and epigenetics of gay people?
Where are the warnings of “risk factors” for lesbians?
Where’s the pleading for “early intervention” for bisexuals?
What about environmental factors?!?!
We probably know less about gay people now than autistic people. But, we know enough not to funnel everything about LGBTQ people through a pathological frame.
All the questions we ask about autism are still there (and largely unanswered) for LGBTQ people.