My Authors
Read all threads
Australia has called for legal amendments to give the @WHO power to investigate outbreaks similar to UN weapons inspectors.

1. How would this be done legally? What are the implications? I haven't done a thread in a while, so here we go.

smh.com.au/politics/feder…
2. When States revised the International Health Regulations after SARS in 2005 they sought to balance sovereignty w public health but there was a "subtle but undeniable dilution of sovereign control" @Gianlucaburci, w WHO able to investigate reports from other states/ngos/media.
3. Another example of this sovereignty dilution: if a State doesn't accept WHO's offer to assist with investigating reports of an outbreak they may have, WHO may share the report with other States if it poses a public health risk (art 10).
4. These were considered big shifts in @WHO's authority. Australia's proposal to have investigation teams wld be profoundly expanding these powers & require revision of the IHR. This would likely get significant push back from major powers because of the sovereignty issue.
5. However, States have agreed to investigation mechanisms in other international regimes: notably arms control treaties like Chemical Weapons & Biological Weapons treaties. The mechanisms under these treaties operate differently & there's controversy about their (lack of) use.
6. There are a lot of potential lessons from intersections between arms control & public health (examples below) however we should examine carefully incorporating blame or punitive measures into public health accountability lest we risk countries becoming even less transparent.
7. Example 1
Last year, We (@RebeccaKatz5 Michelle Rourke & me) produced & presented @BWCISU this White Paper as part of @georgetown_ghss & ILIAID.

Accessing Biological Samples for United Nations Secretary-General Mechanism Investigations

georgetown.app.box.com/s/ynejnxbou0vg…
8. Example 2
At @georgetown_ghss we've been examining potential revisions of the IHR & mechanisms for some time.

Here is @RebeccaKatz5's piece last year on the argument States should adopt a Review Conference framework (like BWC).

nature.com/articles/d4158…
9. Finally, any investigations mechanism proposal must answer:
– when can WHO use power?
– is WHO right body for this power?

WHO is already underfunded and unsupported in the use of the powers it does have: giving WHO more powers without more support is a recipe for failure.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Dr Alexandra Phelan

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!