Thread by @Believe200866

1. Interested about 🐤’r “Moments”? Who’s the 🎯❓
Great article end of thread-
🚨Take always from article below🚨👇👇👇
- 🐤’r 🚩’s POTUS’s 🐤 RE: 📮-In-Ballots #ElectionInterference #ElectionFraud
Let’s move on to what “Actual Fact ✅’s have to say about this...

2. “Actual Fact-✅’s” (not 🐤’r) say:👇👇👇
*🐤’s NOT fact-✅’d, don’t label 🐤’s true/false- just provide hyperlinks 2️⃣ articles 2️⃣ get facts. 🐤’r uses “Moments” - from media outlets 🤔 #BiasedMedia
And.....

3. “Actual Fact-✅’s” (not 🐤’r) also say:👇👇👇
*No transparency readers don’t know who can be 🚩’d; Who’s responsible 4️⃣ “Moments”, how 🐤’s chosen, & is method 4️⃣ USA or WW? #transparency
Continued....

See next tweet intentionally blank

4. Continued from point 3.👆

🚨If WW “Moments” can present issues- Countries expose individual who debunks politicians leading to digital threats.🚨

RED 🚩 #Concern

5. “Actual Fact-✅’s” say👇

*Method only applies to @realDonaldTrump who’s seeking re-election⁉️Tool is partisan🎯❓
*🐤’s posted (NOT POTUS’s 🐤s) RE: USA or WW elections may be false & not 🚩’d instead they’re posted & RT’d 🤬🤬🤬

6. No sides here @ all -research-this can happen to anyone....you should be very concerned. We all have rights all of us & free speech is one. Is it ok to allow radicalism is not. #socialmedia
poynter.org/fact-checking/…

@threadreaderapp unroll