I have some serious concerns about the document.
sickkids.ca/PDFs/About-Sic…
They provide two references to support this statement.
And yet, school outbreaks have occurred in Sweden, including one in which a teacher died.
I've reported multiple studies which show no difference in the proportion of adults and children infected.
You can find them here, along with lots of other interesting data about children and the virus:
➡️ How was the virus introduced into the region, and among whom did it first spread?
➡️ How much community transmission was there at the time?
➡️ Were schools closed?
➡️ Were cases promptly quarantined?
Next, the authors mention that the inflammatory syndrome which has emerged in children (the Kawasaki-like illness) is "relatively rare and is generally treatable."
Let's also not forget that a few children have died, and others will need ongoing follow-up to monitor for cardiovascular problems.
I agree with this.
But a balance must be struck between harms. Schools do need to open, but safely.
Good luck enforcing that.
"There is a lack of evidence that wearing a face mask prevents SARS-CoV-2 transmission in children."
As far as I know, no one has studied this. This is extremely misleading. (I also strongly suspect masks do help).
But they must reopen in a manner which is safe for children, teachers, and the wider community.
Necessary precautions must be taken. This document doesn't identify enough of them.
The risk that children might bring the virus home from school and transmit it to family members must not be ignored. What harms (including psychological), might be associated with that?
We should build testing and contact tracing infrastructure to reduce (and ideally eliminate) community transmission.
South Korea also provides an excellent model for school safety. The pictures really are worth 1,000 words:
washingtonpost.com/education/2020…