Very excited to share our overview on the pathological development of severe COVID-19 under a conservative systemic inflammation derived from COVID-19 associated lung injury (CALI) two hit model consistent with current data 👇🏾

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
On April 4th I started a journey with @Greguialmeida and @ROBERTASANTIS to understand why the circulating levels of IL-6, TNF and IL1 were low in critical patients from Wuhan and still people were insisting in Cytokine Storm as the main cause +
So I read some literature I remembered from pulmonary malaria consequences and convinced @NathanWSchmidt1 that we had some ground to cover using systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to acute lung injury (SIRS-ALI). ALI later came to be covered by SARS definition +
Basically the body responds with two branches when infected by viruses, nicely covered by my hero @VirusesImmunity, the antiviral/antifungal and the inflammatory one. SARS-CoV2 in some patients can block antiviral response and the body respond with CALI + Image
which consists in increasing paracrine levels of IL-6, TNF, IL8, IL-1 orchestrated by alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells, as amazingly described by another hero @MiriamMerad. Upregulating cell adhesion molecules and permeabilizing the lung endothelium +
at the same time, neutrophils invade the lung (due to IL-8, CAMs and VEGF) and cause harm to the tissue. When proinflammatory cytokines reach liver and bone marrow, it triggers the acute phase response which is proinflammatory and pro-coagulatory +
the bone marrow release immature granulocytes that will return to the lung not differentiated, producing weird cytokines (@VirusesImmunity lab confirmed yesterday) and transcriptional signatures as shown by @IdoAmitLab and others. This second hit is facilitated by comorbidities +
We also believe that alteration of ACE2 levels will augment angiotensin 2 and bradikinin (RAS-KKS systems) levels in the body, leading to increased local inflammation and microthrombosis, a bad addition to the coagulatory response by liver and bone marrow stimulation + Image
the second hit in the lung results in increased ARDS, diffused alveolar damage, that can result in cytokine storm syndrome, respiratory failure, sustained stimulation of BM and liver and RAS-KKS will lead to coagulopathy and multi-organ failure +
finally, we assumed at the time (April) that after the second hit, viral particles are no longer necessary to maintain the lung-systemic inflammatory loop, making antivirals less effective against mortality. Finally +
we believe that targeting the systemic loop might be a key to reduce need for ICU, mechanical ventilation and mortality. We proposed bisphosphonates, but fingolimod and other immunosupressors can help... dexamethasone... we were happy to see the model being confirmed as we wrote
of note- studies before 2012 showed that systemic inflammatory response syndrome to acute lung injury increases in age and it's predominant in males. Being really low in young people... of course that's not the mechanism, but a readout of systemic sensibility to injury
@threadreaderapp unroll this please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rafael Polidoro, PhD

Rafael Polidoro, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RafaelPolidoro2

May 8, 2021
Pessoal, alguém já fez um🧵 sobre as tecnologias por trás das vacinas de covid? Acabei de comentar num post convencendo um pai a tomar e ele dizia "leva pelo menos 5 anos pra desenvolver uma vacina, eu não vou ser cobaia" +
Eu responderia que não leva 5, levam 20 anos. E a maioria dá errada. Só que demos sorte dessa vez porque o epitopo da Espícula funcionou de primeira. Mas a tecnologia dessas vacinas é de décadas atrás +
As quimicamente inativadas são centenárias. As subparticuladas multi décadas. As de adenovirus já tinha década de pesquisa quando eu usei o Ad5 pra vacina de Chagas e toxoplasmose em 2006 +
Read 8 tweets
Feb 10, 2021
Our gamma delta + malaria paper got a "News and Views" @NatImmunol from the Harty's lab (probably a reviewer, hahaha). It was incredibly precise with the words, I'm deeply honored and I'm ready for a LONG🧵 on the paper! Let's go 1/
This story ain't new. As soon as the TCR was cloned, G9D2 T cells showed up in malaria context, not only that: they blast. A phenomena common when FSC and SSC were incredibly informative of activated phenotype and not all antibodies were available for FACS 2/
What that looked like in my hands was like this. Delta 2 TCR-PE purified human T cells (from PBMC) incubated with IL-2/IL-15 and P. falciparum 3d7 for 1d, 2d and 4 days. They not only blast, they become "grabby" with all RBCs in the absence of antibodies 3/
Read 24 tweets
Nov 23, 2020
Meus dois centavos das 3:
As fases iniciais foram em caucasianos e saudáveis (maioria). E produziu resposta imune desejável nestes.
No Brasil diverso e com muita comorbidade a gente n faz a menor ideia de como a Pfizer e a modeRNA vão se sair. A charge é (por enquanto) espúria.
Ainda digo mais - Pelo q fala no link, nenhum caso severo foi nos vacinados. Então p evitar morte e hospitalização foi (por hora) 100% eficiência como as outras. Efeito já mto desejável. A gente vai precisar de todas, ainda mais se usar a logística da vacina de gripe.
@RaisaRomor eu acho q a diferença não é imune. Pode ser:

1) 90% porque foi na Inglaterra, 62% pq foi BR

2) lei dos pequenos números. Com um N 5x menor, você tem maior
frequência de extremos estatísticos

3) diferenças nas coortes (idade, raça, classe, % comorbidade)
Read 4 tweets
Nov 23, 2020
Vamos ao fio das vacinas em fase 3 e algumas explicações, mas como vai ser longo, eu possivelmente vou dividir. Lembremos q isso é uma simplificação, a plataforma é desenhada pra isso.
Uma pergunta q repete em tweets é tipo de imunização 1/n
Imunização passiva, ex: anticorpos transplacentários, colostro, soro convalescente. Efeitos - proteção imediata; curta duração; podem causar doenças do soro.
Imunização ativa, ex: vacinação e infecção natural. Efeito duradouro (varia) 2/n
Antecipando a pergunta - vacinação é frequentemente superior à infecção natural porque esta pode ser a qualquer proteína viral, pode ser inadequada quando o vírus combate a resposta imune, pode ñ ser neutralizante, etc; já as vacinas são desenhadas pra serem efetivas. 3/n
Read 19 tweets
Nov 16, 2020
O fio em português para não imunologistas pq tem gente me perguntando no inbox:
94% de proteção pode ser menos da metade. Segue o fio:

A vacina tem um componente específico (gene/mRNA/proteína/partícula do SARS-CoV2) e um componente inflamatório (adjuvante). +
O adjuvante causa inflamação forte, um susto imune. No primeiro mês após as duas doses das vacinas em questão, você tem a influência do efeito do adjuvante alto. Esse efeito causa seu corpo entrar em um estado anti-inflamatório de reparação do susto que foi tomar a vacina. +
Se esse efeito adjuvante aumenta o limiar necessário para o vírus causar sintomas em você, você fica protegido graças ao adjuvante. E nenhum componente do SARS-CoV2 contou nada... a proteção ao SARS-CoV2 pode ser 0.
Chutando que sejam 50%, e o adjuvante 40% na proteção +
Read 7 tweets
Nov 16, 2020
I'll make a quick thread on why I'm still skeptical with the press releases on vaccines. Please add to the discussion.

1) Press release is not science. It has actually done more harm than good.
2) It seems that the symptoms were the endpoint in all >90% protection claims, but +
If my model (pinned post) is minimally correct, systemic inflammation due to lung injury demands neutrophils and other leukocyte infiltration, immature release of leukocyte from the bone marrow and together with liver stimulation, some coagulopathy +
all those things can be augmented by a previous chronic systemic inflammation (comorbidities), amplifying the odds of getting symptoms in the lung and in the body. Similarly, all those things can b prevented by a chronic tolerogenic environment, and here's how +
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(