I’m beginning to suspect that “misunderstandings” like this are actually on purpose. 🤔
The mission seems to be making activisits seem ridiculous and arbitrary. Nobody asked for this but they frame it like we did & then groups like #blm lose credibility for nothing.
That’s the only thing that explains all these weird concessions. Like when that publishing company decided to reissue classic books with Black people on the cover.
They “concede” to something imaginary & then huff “what more do these people want?” as if this was part of demands
Every week there’s something new. “Global Pizzeria Franchise stops selling black olives to prevent offense to racial groups” is some random **** you’ll find on these new sites regularly. At this point it seems like outright mockery. If you believe Black activism is stupid say so
Any news outlet that does a story on these kinds of sham concessions is basically admitting that they believe Black activism is akin to the outrageous demands that toddlers make. Why else would one even entertain such a story if not to show disrespect for Black civil rights.
All so some idiot somewhere can say “Last week they wanted the traffic lights to have a rainbow light, now they want legal rights— when will they be happy!”
As if these ‘demands’ are equal in their seriousness or moral tenor. It actually irritates me a lot.
Then you have “everyday” “centrist” people saying things like “I was with them till they started asking for too much—“ and I promise the “too much” is reference to these fake demands that papers are always publishing.
It’s definitely a ‘baby with the bath water’ situation. They give people permission to disregard *everything* because of this one little fake thing.
More than anyone the gender rights advocates have suffered for this. Every week papers go out of their way to make trans and lgbq activists seem truly ridiculous if not outright insane. That one also has very real political ramifications.
Alt-right recruiters literally cite these stories to convince people that rights advocacy is stupid and that only the “objective” “mature” and “grounded” view of the world is worth considering. They frame the AltRight as the bedrock of rationality. Like wtf is happening rn
This is another version of the Black bogeyman strategy. It makes it seem like if you let Black people have anything they want, the world will become a cartoonish mess. Chocolate will be illegal and people who kill Black people will face “consequences” and who knows what else! 👻
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How. Please tell me how. I’m begging you please. How can you talk about the economic “success” of countries like England, US and France and Spain and so on without once — EVEN ONCE — mentioning slavery, colonization, theft and corruption. Please I just want to know how sway.
I’m not trying to be edgy. I genuinely want to know why people talk about Christianity, western culture, strong institutions or whatever as being behind their “success” without mentioning - I don’t know - decades of free money. Free labor. Free resources. Paid for with brutality
Then when you bring this up it’s like you’re some kind of radical activist or whatever when it is pointing out simple, honest-to-god economic theory.
If you don’t pay for something then you can accumulate as much as possible. That feels reasonable, right?
Watching the Tiger Woods doc, I just felt intense pity for someone who seems to have willingly starved themselves of Black camaraderie and its many joys.
Its difficult to comment on an adult's life, one I know quite little about. But imagine spending your whole life without the counsel of your kinfolk. That's the true tragedy to me.
Watching the doc with my Af-Am and Af friends, we just kept shouting "all you needed was one Black friend. just one!" The friends he had in that doc were really something else
How long will you punish yourselves with this stuff? Instead of learning something from others that could save your own country’s life?
No! it has to be something *cultural* and *genetic* because otherwise you would have thought of it first, right? What a tragedy
You can’t just sit down and study what Asian health ministries did; what African healthcare systems did - no! You’d rather your people died thinking they are better off than those “s*hole countries.” This is very very sad.
I truly cannot fathom how an academic can go into an interview and claim that social media is responsible for college aged people’s depression and not mention even once the weight of staggering student loans. Like...am I crazy?
How do people go on public forums and talk about anything else but the economic life of generation z? I heard this social psychologist blame “safe spaces” for increased depression in college aged people. I almost fainted.
We’re talking about a generation of people who may never get out from under their student debt. By 2015 Americans owed a total of 1.41 trillion $ in loans for school. Then this guy’s gonna go on radio and say talking about microaggressions is making people soft. Wtf is happening
Sometimes I think this is the biggest hurdle to jump in modern politics; freeing people from the false identification with the wealthy. It is truly important that we share a single economic reality
And it’s wild how embedded this misidentification is in corporate media. Business news is written from the perspective of shareholders and CEOs. Rarely those whose lives are shattered by things cutely named “streamlining” and “synergising” or whatever.
If firings are mentioned it’s to point to them as a *solution* to some problem that exists in only the minds of those who are upset by a 0.5% drop in profit margins or something equally ridiculous.
Please spare a thought for the amount of extra labor women have to do in the workplace to make sure other women don’t have to interact with male predators.
Think of women supervisors who have to take on more work because an intern doesn’t feel comfortable around some guy who she was supposed to be reporting to.
Think of women professors who have to do extra advising because their male counterparts make women students feel unsafe alone with them.