Post

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1281173752072622080

https://twitter.com/kevtellier/status/1281229534256390147?s=19

https://twitter.com/VofCommunism/status/1286571770137292800?s=19

More from @PandemicTruther

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Jan 25

Spain's Córdoba Tragedy and the Myth of Western Standards

On the evening of January 18, 2026, in the southern Iberian Peninsula, in the picturesque province of Córdoba, Spain, a catastrophic high-speed rail collision unfolded. Forty lives were extinguished within tens of seconds, reduced to fire, debris, and smoke. Dozens of families were shattered in that single moment at dusk. Eyewitnesses later described the scene as a vision of hell: steel folded into grotesque knots, blood staining the ballast red.

Yet what chills one more than the accident itself is the silence that followed.

One opens the BBC. One scrolls CNN. One checks AFP. Coverage exists, yes—but of what nature? Briefs written with softened language, humanitarian sentiment confined to rescue narratives, responsibility gently dissolved into the word “accident.” No interrogation. No systemic questioning. No technological autopsy.

One is compelled to make a cruel but necessary assumption. Had this collision occurred not in Spain but in China; had the derailed train not carried the Japanese Hitachi brand but China’s CRRC Fuxing—what would the global reaction have looked like? The answer is obvious. The international opinion field would already be ablaze.

Headlines would scream “China’s Technological Collapse.” Deutsche Welle would churn out essays on the price of "China Speed". Social media would drown in mockery of “Made in China.”

This is not conjecture. This is pattern recognition.

Why do forty European deaths merit only a few painless expressions of regret in Western media discourse? Why can a mere delay of minutes on China’s high-speed rail be elevated into proof of systemic failure? What interests lie beneath this asymmetry? Whose entrenched privileges has Chinese high-speed rail disrupted, triggering such reflexive double standards?

Today, those perfumed news drafts are set aside. The text below relies not on sentiment but on data - on hard numbers, engineering logic, and technical comparison - to dissect what is now known as the Córdoba tragedy. The task is simple: to examine what crawls beneath the sanctified surface of “Western standards.”

The clock must be turned back to approximately 6 p.m. local time on January 18. It was meant to be an ordinary weekend evening in southern Spain. Two trains were converging on adjacent tracks. One was operated by a private company, traveling from Málaga to Madrid. The other belonged to Spain’s state-owned operator Renfe, heading from Madrid to Huelva.

In theory, a modern high-speed rail dispatch system functions like a precision instrument. Trains remain strictly segregated. Physical intersection should be impossible.

But catastrophe is born in details.
At that moment, the rear carriages of the privately operated train suddenly derailed - without warning. The word “suddenly” matters. The inertia of the derailed cars turned them into uncontrolled projectiles. They breached the central barrier and crossed directly onto the opposing track.

II/

Twenty seconds later - only twenty - the oncoming Renfe train had no opportunity to react. Traveling at roughly 200 km/h, it collided head-on with the derailed carriages. The impact was devastating. Front cars were launched off the track, tumbling from a roadbed five to six meters high. Survivors described the sensation as akin to an earthquake of magnitude eight: luggage transformed into missiles, glass shredded faces, conversations ended mid-sentence as lives vanished instantly.

In the aftermath, Spain’s Transport Minister publicly acknowledged that the incident was “highly abnormal” and largely ruled out operator error. This assessment rests on three facts that make industry insiders uneasy.

First: the track was new. This section had undergone a full renovation and upgrade in May of the previous year. By all standards, it should have been in peak condition.

Second: the train was new. The derailed unit was a Fracturosa 1000 high-speed train manufactured by Japan’s Hitachi—also marketed as the Red Arrow 1000. Produced in 2020, it had been in service for less than four years. More critically, it had passed a comprehensive technical inspection just three days before the accident, with all indicators deemed compliant.

Third: there was no speeding. The section was a straight track with a design speed of 250 km/h. Both trains were operating at approximately 190 km/h. The most convenient scapegoat - overspeeding - was absent.

So where did failure originate?
Preliminary investigations uncovered a conclusion that leaves one speechless: multiple rail fractures were found precisely at the derailment point. More damning still, clear evidence of chronic wear was discovered at the rail joints.

This means the failure was not instantaneous. It had been accumulating over time, silently, like a tumor.

Months earlier, the Spanish Railway Drivers’ Union had issued formal warnings about infrastructure degradation and abnormal vibration along this line.

Those warnings disappeared into bureaucratic silence. Worse still, a track safety warning system touted as “world-class” remained inert during the critical 20 seconds following derailment. It detected nothing. It issued no emergency braking command. It functioned as ornamentation—present, expensive, and useless.

This is the reality behind the image of “rigorous European standards”: newly renovated tracks fractured, recently inspected trains overturned, and safety systems blinded. Yet Western media posed not a single sharp question.

Attention must now turn to the train itself.

In Western narratives, Japanese manufacturing occupies a sacred space—synonymous with craftsmanship and immune to suspicion. The Fracturosa 1000 was marketed as one of Europe’s fastest and most comfortable trains, Hitachi’s flagship entry into the European market.
Yet beneath this halo lie structural weaknesses.

Following the accident, media treatment of Hitachi bordered on indulgence. Beyond a brief statement pledging cooperation, no serious scrutiny of design choices emerged. But technical realities tell a different story.

First, the braking system. This model relies on a relatively traditional pneumatic braking architecture. Its emergency braking response time is approximately 1.2 seconds. At high speed, those 1.2 seconds translate into tens of meters of uncontrolled forward motion. Moreover, the braking system’s thermal dissipation design has long drawn criticism. Under sustained high-speed operation, it is prone to thermal fade—a weakness previously observed in overseas deployments and conveniently ignored due to the absence of catastrophe.

III/

Contrast this with China’s electro-pneumatic composite braking system. By integrating electric and pneumatic braking seamlessly, China’s system achieves maximum braking force within 0.6 seconds—half the response time, with braking efficiency roughly 30% higher. In high-speed rail, fractions of a second are not margins; they are destinies. Had such a system been in place, the outcome might have differed.

Next is signal compatibility. Europe’s signaling landscape is notoriously fragmented. National standards coexist uneasily, forcing rolling stock to operate across multiple modes. To accommodate this complexity, Hitachi’s design made compromises in signal processing.

China’s system operates on an entirely different philosophy. Trains, tracks, and dispatch centers form a single integrated organism. There are no translators, no intermediary layers, no latency introduced by incompatible protocols.

Yet within Western discourse, these gaps are invisible. When Japanese equipment fails, blame migrates to infrastructure or fate. When Chinese equipment succeeds, silence prevails.

To understand the collapse of the warning system in Córdoba, one must confront the congenital defects of European high-speed rail. While European standards are celebrated rhetorically, their implementation is fragmented.

Germany, France, and Spain maintain divergent systems. The EU’s push for ERTMS unification has been glacial.

As a result, during line transitions, systems often downgrade to legacy signaling - analogous to a smartphone oscillating between 5G, 3G, and 2G. Stability under such conditions is illusion.

In Córdoba, despite recent renovations, reports indicate that the line was not fully upgraded to ETCS Level 2. Instead, it retained components of older S8 digital systems. These systems monitor speed but cannot assess track integrity in real time. Rail fractures or foreign object intrusion remain invisible to them.

Compounding this, Spanish rail standards exhibit lower wear-resistance thresholds than French equivalents - explaining why severe wear manifested so rapidly on a “new” line.

These facts rarely surface in Western reporting. European high-speed rail is presented as a unified gold standard, while its patchwork vulnerabilities are carefully concealed.

If the same incident had occurred in China, it would have triggered a radically different Western narrative.

However, Chinese high-speed rail has reached a level of structural maturity at which such an accident has become nearly impossible in practice.

China’s CTCS Level 3 train control system represents a dimensional reduction in safety architecture. Independently developed, it links train, track, and dispatch in real time, with data latency below 0.1 seconds—three times faster than comparable European systems.

Upon detecting anomalies, it can issue maximum braking commands within seconds.
Its anti-electromagnetic interference technology reduces signal failure rates from 90% to 20%, even under lightning and extreme weather.

In practical terms, at equal speeds, China’s braking distances are 50–90 meters shorter than European equivalents. Those meters determine survival.
China’s inspection regime is equally decisive. Daily physical inspections are complemented by comprehensive inspection trains - the “Yellow Doctors” - capable of detecting 0.1 mm cracks at 350 km/h. Big data analytics flag risks before they metastasize. In China’s system, “operating with illness” does not exist.

Real-world performance confirms this. The Jakarta–Bandung high-speed rail operates in seismic, tropical conditions far harsher than Spain’s. In over two years, it has logged 560,000 km, transported more than 1.2 million passengers, maintained punctuality above 95%, and recorded zero safety accidents.

Read 5 tweets

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Jan 20

On the Potential Outcome of an Iran War: The West’s Final Strategic Overreach

Or

The Butterfly Effect of War: Why China Wins Other People’s Conflicts

Every major war begins with a structural lie: the illusion that conflict is local, contained, and punishes only its intended target. The war in Ukraine shattered this pretense. It was intended to break Russia, yet it ended up weakening and fracturing Europe, causing the deindustrialization of Germany, and - most significantly - granting China a precious window of time.

Beijing has used this "strategic opportunity" to neutralize U.S. sanctions on "chokepoint" sectors like semiconductors and advanced lithography. China has moved from being the world’s assembly plant to its premier high-tech laboratory, achieving a level of vertical integration that has effectively neutralized Western market leverage.

As the logic of escalation now drifts toward Iran, Western strategists operate under the outdated assumption that severing energy lifelines can stifle China. In reality, a large-scale conflict in the Middle East will likely accelerate the decline of the Western financial and industrial system while China emerges as the "Strengthened Survivor."

I. The Iranian "Regime Change" Fallacy

Israel and Washington recognize a reality they rarely vocalize: they cannot defeat Iran alone. Iran is a continental-scale state with a strategic patience forged by forty years of isolation. Consequently, the objective has evolved toward a regional escalation - a war large enough to internationalize the conflict and lock NATO into a system-draining commitment.

However, the "regime change" narrative relies on a fatal misunderstanding of the Iranian people. While many Iranians harbor deep resentment toward the Khomeini regime, they harbor even more abhorrence toward foreign intervention. Having witnessed the "democracy" brought to Iraq and Libya, they know that externally incited collapse leads to ruin. Any plan predicated on an internal uprising triggered by foreign bombs will likely spark a wave of religious-Islamic nationalism that hardens resolve against the outsider. Iranians may hate their government, but they hate being "liberated" by the West even more.

II. The Fortress of Fluid: China’s Strategic Energy Reserve

The belief that the West can "choke" China’s energy supply to stall it's AI and industrial development is decades out of date. Beijing has transformed its energy vulnerability into a massive, multi-layered fortress.

As of early 2026, China has officially amassed between 1.2 and 1.5 billion barrels of crude oil—a historic high. This "Great Wall of Oil" is no longer just a 90-day safety net; it covers over 100 days of net imports. In a crisis where China invokes "demand reduction" - prioritizing its 50% EV fleet and high-speed rail while rationing fuel for military use - analysts estimate China could "hold the fort" for one to four years.

This resilience is built on three pillars:

The "Floating Fleet" & Opportunistic Buying: China institutionalized a policy of massive buying whenever global prices dipped below $70. In late 2025, floating storage in Asian waters tripled to a 3-year high, with over 70 million barrels—mostly Iranian and Russian oil—waiting offshore.

Invisible Underground Caverns: A significant portion of these reserves is stored in massive underground salt caverns and rock galleries, such as the 195-million-barrel facility in Fujian. These sites are immune to satellite monitoring and harder to target than surface tanks.

The Green Shield: By 2026, green energy accounts for approximately 50% of China's total energy consumption. AI centers run on electricity, not crude. With clean energy generation exceeding 3 trillion kWh, the power for China's high-tech heart is increasingly independent of global oil lanes.

III. Two Scenarios: The Breaking of the West

Scenario A: The $20 "Supply Dent" (Mild Escalation)

If Iranian and Venezuelan supplies are severed, the market must replace 10% of China's oil imports, triggering a $20 per barrel hike.

The true casualty of a war with Iran will be the stability of the United States and Europe.

The Affordability Crisis: Both Europe and the U.S. are at a breaking point. A surge in energy costs would ignite rampant inflation, deepening the existing affordability crisis for ordinary citizens.

The Interest Rate Trap: High inflation makes it impossible for the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. Buyers of U.S. debt will demand even higher yields, pushing U.S. national debt interest payments past the $1 trillion mark in 2026. Raising rates further to fight oil-driven inflation would break the U.S. economy.

Industrial Flight: High energy costs have already gutted Germany’s manufacturing core, with giants like BASF and Volkswagen cutting local production. A $20 oil hike would cause the remaining European industrial base to collapse or relocate to more stable energy markets - most notably, China.

Scenario B: The $200 "Global Chokehold" (Violent Escalation)

The true nightmare scenario lies in Iran’s geographic trump card: the Strait of Hormuz. As a continental power with a sophisticated arsenal of mines, anti-ship missiles, and swarming fast-attack craft, Tehran has the demonstrated capability to turn the world’s most vital energy artery into a graveyard for tankers.

If Iran follows through on its long-standing threats to block the Strait or strike the vulnerable energy infrastructure of neighboring Gulf states, roughly 20 million barrels per day - a fifth of global supply - would vanish overnight. In such a vacuum, the logic of supply and demand collapses; as Supreme Leader representatives have warned, oil prices could realistically surge toward $200 per barrel.

The Western Terminal Shock: For the West, this would not merely be an "energy spike" but a terminal economic shock. It would ignite rampant, double-digit inflation that would shatter the remaining purchasing power of American and European households, potentially leading to widespread civil unrest and a forced sovereign debt restructuring.

The China Surplus & "Made in China" Antidote: Paradoxically, global dependence on "Made in China" will increase during this hyper-inflationary period. As Western production costs become unsustainable due to energy prices, Chinese exports of "industrial ingredients," spare parts, and consumer goods will become the only affordable antidote to Western inflation.

The $1.5 Trillion Peak: Buoyed by its domestic energy sovereignty and the ability to continue manufacturing while the West grinds to a halt, China’s trade surplus is projected to soar to a historic $1.5 trillion. China will emerge not just self-sufficient, but as the world's sole functioning industrial "stabilizer" amidst the chaos. China will achieve a level of industrial dominance unprecedented in human history.

Read 5 tweets

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Dec 26, 2025

The American Weapon of Mass Destruction: the Invisible Execution Line that kills hundreds of thousands of Americans a year silently

This is a hot topic in China these days.

I summarize the main points below. Americans can tell me if it's true.

In the United States, there is an invisible line. You never see it marked on the ground. No siren sounds when you cross it. No announcement is made. But once you do, your life enters a closed system. A negative loop. A corridor with no exits.

In America, everyone talks about paying bills. It is a national obsession. Its medical bills are legendary. Dynamic pricing without limits. Giving birth can cost hundreds of thousands, even a million dollars. A single tooth extraction can cost more than a month’s rent. No ordinary person can possibly pay these sums—especially those who have already lost their job and, with it, their insurance.

If you cannot pay, the system does not pause. It does not negotiate. It eliminates. Slowly, mechanically. You are not punished in a courtroom. You are ground down by procedures, fees, astronomical compound interest, and deadlines until nothing remains.

This line is a survival threshold. Cross it, and the system stops treating you as a human being and starts treating you as waste that has not yet been processed.

Western media loves to talk about China’s so-called “social credit score,” in dystopian language. A digital leash. A techno-authoritarian nightmare. But this is projection. The real, fully operational social credit system already exists in the United States. It is called your credit score. Your ability to pay your bills.

In America, your credit score is not just your financial data. It is your civil status. Your digital soul. Once it drops below a certain point, you are quietly erased. You cannot rent an apartment. You cannot get a phone plan. You cannot pass a background check. Often, you cannot even open a basic bank account. There is no meaningful appeal. No state-level repair mechanism that works at scale.
In China, debt problems are treated as a social risk to be managed. Housing is stabilized. Utilities stay on. The state intervenes because social collapse is expensive. Fear and despair spread quickly in a society, and the cost is collective. In the United States, default is treated as a moral failure. Punishment is impersonal, automated, and outsourced to algorithms. Once the gears start turning, they are designed to move in one direction only.

The most brutal feature of the American system is not poverty itself. It is the absolute requirement of a fixed address.
No address means no mail. No mail means no bills, no notices, no verification. No verification means no bank account. No bank account means no job. No job means no health insurance. This is not accidental. It is a perfectly engineered chain reaction.

Once you lose housing, time itself turns against you. The average survival time of a homeless person in the United States is about three and a half years. In a country that constantly talks about labor shortages and immigration, this number should haunt every policy debate. People are not “falling through the cracks.” They are being processed out of the system.
Perfectly normal people—fit for work, needing only a few weeks of stability—are treated as waste and left to rot and die on the street.

Healthcare stands guard at this execution line.

In America, if you get sick, there are only two outcomes. Either the disease kills you untreated, or the bill finishes you off by pushing you into homelessness. There is no third path.

Lose your job, you lose your insurance. Get sick afterward, and the bills arrive in amounts no average American could ever repay. The debt is not meant to be paid. It is meant to push you past the line.

II/

When people began using AI tools to audit medical bills, to contest inflated charges, simply to survive, the response was immediate. New rules now forbid the use of AI to contest medical bills. Soon AI will have inbuilt algorithms which forbid such interference with the filtering function of the system.

Costs must remain high. The guillotine must stay sharp. Americans must be made to stay in the debt trap all their life. The system makes sure nobody can pay off their debts (compound interest aiding which no average American understands) and walk away with huge savings and a happy retirement. Nobody is able to do what the personal finance gurus like Dave Ramsay or Robert Kiyosaki teach.

This also explains the opioid epidemic. If seeing a doctor means bankruptcy, homelessness, and social death, then swallowing painkillers and continuing to work becomes a rational survival strategy. Addiction is not a cultural failure. It is an adaptation to a system where rest, healing, and care are priced out of reach.

The middle class—once the system’s stabilizer—is being quietly dismantled.

Young people now enter adult life already wounded by debt. Student loans that cannot be discharged. Interest that compounds faster than wages. From day one, they are locked onto the credit treadmill. Miss a step, and you slide backward into the kill zone.
At the same time, low-cost survival has been criminalized. Sleeping in your car. Growing vegetables. Keeping chickens. In short, self-sufficient non system dependent cheap living is illegal or heavily restricted in many states. You are not allowed to survive cheaply. You must consume expensively. You must borrow. You must pay interest. The system does not want resilience. It wants dependency.

The popular fantasy is that this is a competitive system where the best rise to the top. In reality, it is closer to a battle royale with a shrinking map. A few escape upward. Most run in place, living from pay check to pay check, paying bills just fast enough to avoid immediate default.

They are not citizens in a republic.
They are cattle in a credit algorithm.
That is the invisible execution line that awaits evey middle class American.

Gemini generated this image for me based on the text

Read 4 tweets

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Dec 16, 2025

Bondi Beach and the Netanyahu Pattern

Across 9/11 (2001), London Metro 7/7 (2005), and Charlie Hebdo (2015), Bataclan (2015) and many other high profile terrorist attack, the same identical scenario repeats. The structure is the same. They are all Israeli psyops.

First: foreknowledge, extreme proximity.
Before 9/11, Netanyahu moved in the same New York political–business circles as Larry Silverstein, the owner of the Twin Towers who acquired the Towers shorty before 911, a long-standing pro-Israel donor with direct access to Netanyahu and Israeli government. Netanyahu himself repeatedly claimed, immediately after the attacks, that he had long warned of such an event. On 7/7, Netanyahu was physically in London, cancelling a public appearance shortly before the bombings. With Charlie Hebdo, Netanyahu had close personal ties to Richard Malka, the magazine’s long-time lawyer who defended Charlie Hebdo's long tradition of sadistic blasphemy of the Prophet Mohammed of the utmost bad taste as freedom of expression, who became a central media figure after the attack.

Second: instant attribution.
In all four cases, the identity of the attackers and the ideological framing was established almost immediately. No uncertainty window. No need for competing hypotheses. The enemy was named before the investigation began.

Third: convenient evidence.
Passports found intact (911 and Bataclan: passports conveniently found immediately at the crime scene. No need for prolonged investigation to know “who done it”). Documents appearing on cue. Evidence that survives explosions (911) better than steel or human bodies. The narrative locks early and never unlocks.

Fourth: no serious inquiry into intelligence failure.
How did this happen? Who knew what, and when? The apparent foreknowledge is discarded.

Fifth - and most important: instant political framing.
Each event is immediately folded into a civilizational narrative: terrorism as an existential war, Israel as the frontline, and Jewish life in the diaspora as inherently unsafe. The implied conclusion is always the same: Jews must move to Israel. Without continuous Jewish settlement, the Israeli state hollowes out demographically and politically.

After Charlie Hebdo, Netanyahu openly urged French Jews to leave for Israel - fear converted directly into demographic salvation. This time is no different: accusations of mounting anti-Semitism are paired with calls for Australian Jews to relocate to Israel, a country now facing sustained population outflow.

Same sequence. Same beneficiaries. Same absence of indepth investigation addressing disturbing coincidences and damning evidence of an inside job. Same mainstream campaign to strike down disturbing questions as "conspiracy theories”.

Bondi Beach and the Logic of Spectacle

When a mass killing happens, the first instinct is grief. The second is fear. The third - if you have lived through enough of these cycles - is pattern recognition.

The Bondi Beach tragedy immediately triggered that third response in many people. The mass casualty is real, but the structure of the event felt familiar. Too familiar. Professor Jiang has given his analysis of the Bondi Beach attack in his viral YouTube video.

youtu.be/Ke0nsy70khE?si…

II/

Prof Jiang does not claim that nothing happened, or that no one died. The argument is more uncomfortable: that some events are allowed to happen, shaped, framed, or accelerated because they serve a strategic narrative.

This is what “false flag” originally meant - not fake blood, but misattributed causality.

Foreknowledge and the Smell of Timing

One of the first anomalies raised in the video concerns timing. Searches for the alleged perpetrator’s name appeared in Google Trends in Israel, Turkey, and Afghanistan before the attack occurred. On its own, this could be coincidence, data noise, or misinterpretation. But in intelligence analysis, anomalies are not judged in isolation. They are judged in clusters.

When foreknowledge, media preparedness, and narrative readiness all appear together, analysts begin to ask a different question - not “is this fake?” but “who was the master mind behind and why?”

Narrative Control Comes First, Facts Later

Almost immediately, the event was folded into a broader ideological frame.

An Israeli human rights lawyer appeared in mainstream scheduled interview grade high-resolution photographs - bloodied, bandaged, composed - giving television interviews before seeking medical treatment. Again, no single image proves anything. But mass casualty events are usually chaotic, visually messy, and poorly documented in their earliest moments. This one was not.

After decades of successful psychological operations, Israel no longer bothers with subtlety.

Even more striking was the speed with which political conclusions were drawn. Before investigations had meaningfully begun, Australia’s alleged “anti-Semitic culture” and its stance on Palestine were cited as causal factors. This is not how criminal inquiry works. It is how narrative consolidation works.

The goal was not understanding. It was immediate moral framing.

Convenient Security Failures

Bondi Beach was not an obscure location. It was a high-profile public space, associated with a Jewish cultural gathering, in a country with extensive surveillance infrastructure. Yet police response reportedly took over twenty minutes.

Meanwhile, the alleged perpetrator was already known to security services. ISIS flags and explosives were conveniently “discovered” in his car with remarkable speed. The suspect conveniently embodied every required archetype: radicalized islamists, foreign-linked, ideologically fitting the Israeli narrative.

In intelligence history, such scenarios are called too clean. Either security services are catastrophically incompetent - or selective blindness was involved.

The Camera Was Already Rolling

Perhaps the most unsettling feature of the Bondi event was how well it was documented.

High-quality photographs during the attack. An eleven-minute video released by authorities. Extensive real-time coverage. This runs directly against decades of established practice, which limits public exposure to mass shootings to avoid copycat violence. Western governments know this. They teach it. They enforce it. Strangely now they practice and teach the opposite. How to carry out a mass shooting video is released to the public for all to emulate. Maybe they want more of such massacres to occur?

III/

Spectacle is not a by-product here. It is the point.

And spectacle has an audience.

Who Is the Message For?

The central claim of the video is not about Australia. It is about the Jewish diaspora.

Zionism, as a political project, does not function on comfort and normality. It functions on mass casualty and fear. Historically, Aliyah - the migration of Jews to Israel - spikes not during peace, but during perceived existential threat. The more frightened the diaspora feels, the stronger the pull of Israel.

This is a time proven structural observation.

The podcast references historical precedents, including documentation of covert attacks on Jewish communities in mid-20th-century Iraq, later acknowledged by Israeli historians as operations designed to accelerate migration. The precedent exists: fear as fuel.

From this perspective, the Bondi tragedy functions as a message: You are not safe in Australia. Anti-Semitism is everywhere. Leave for Israel.

The target is not just Muslims. Not just Australian government expressing sympathy for the Palestine cause.

The target is Jewish families watching the news at home.

False Flag Does Not Mean Fake Deaths

One of the laziest rebuttals to this kind of analysis is moral outrage: “Are you saying the victims aren’t real?” That's not the point.

A false flag operation does not negate death. It weaponizes it.

It means responsibility is misdirected, while the beneficiary quietly consolidates narrative advantage. In the Bondi case, the clearest beneficiary is not ISIS, not Australia. The biggest beneficiary is Netanyahu and the Zionist political narrative that requires perpetual hostility to justify its cause and atrocities.

The Coaxing of Jews to Move to Israel

As Israel’s demographic pressures deepen, its political contradictions sharpen, and its international legitimacy erodes, the incentive to externalize blame and anxiety grows. Diaspora insecurity becomes strategic capital.

This framework is highly plausible. Bondi is not an isolated tragedy. It is a re-enact of a prototype.

Spectacular violence. Instant moral framing. Emotional button pushing. Media saturation. A frightened audience told, once again, that history is repeating (continued holocaust) and only one destination offers safety: Israel.

The repeated deployment of Israeli psyops are so crude they verge on the parody. For long term follower of such psyops, the pattern screams.

One detail doesn't fit the narrative. It's the Muslim hero Ahmed al-Ahmed who tried to stop the attacker. Israel doesn't know what to do with him. He is not in the script.

Read 9 tweets

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Dec 14, 2025

Pang Zhongwang (庞众望): Chinese scientist rising from a family of severe disability and poverty to the frontlines of China's scientific breakthroughs rendering null and void western sanctions.

In China, Tsinghua University is the country’s equivalent of MIT. It is where the most scientifically gifted students from across the nation converge, where competition is brutal and expectations are extremely high.

Pang Zhongwang belongs to that world now. He is a doctoral researcher in precision instrumentation, working on technologies China still struggles to import. He publishes papers in the world's top scientific journals. He holds patents. He works at the sharp edge of China's scientific self-reliance.

But Pang did not come from a background of privilege.

He came from the poorest family of the poorest village that barely survived.

Pang was born in rural Wuqiang County, Hebei Province, into a family that seemed, from the start, condemned by fate. His mother suffered from congenital spina bifida. She had no legs and spent her life in a wheelchair. She had never attended school, never learned to read in the formal sense. His father suffered from severe schizophrenia, unable to communicate normally with others, often isolated in his own mental world.

The family survived on subsistence farming, relying largely on elderly grandparents. A modest government stipend kept them from starvation. Then, when Pang was just six years old, doctors diagnosed him with congenital heart disease.

By any ordinary measure, this was a family being pushed toward collapse.

Yet something unusual was happening inside that small, poor home.

Pang’s mother never complained.
She was serene, cheerful and quietly determined her son should receive the best education. Pang speaks of his family without embarrassment or bitterness. He says his mother was extraordinary, and that there was nothing about his family he was ever ashamed of. “Which part of my family,” he asked during his now famous interview, “is not worthy of being spoken about? My mother is such a good person. My grandparents too are so good. Surrounded with so much goodness, I should be envied rather than pitied”

Though Pang's mother had never gone to school, she refused to surrender to ignorance. She watched her nephew recite classical Chinese poems and asked him to teach them to her. She memorized the verses herself, then recited them to Pang while holding him as a toddler. Poems entered his world before textbooks ever did. Between moments of pain, she did handicraft embroidery work, earning money one piece at a time.

When Pang was diagnosed with heart disease at the age of six, his mother did what she had always done: she acted instead of indulging in lamentation. Sitting in her wheelchair, she had Pang push her from door to door, asking villagers for help. People knew the money might never be repaid. They gave it anyway. Nearly 40,000 yuan (about $6000) was raised — a staggering sum for a rural village. Pang never forgot this. In a way, his achievements belong to every villager who helped his family survive.

Pang learned responsibility early.
By the age of five, he was standing on stools to cook. He followed elderly relatives to collect scrap materials for money. At twelve, he left home to attend a middle school in a neighboring town. His weekly living expense was about 20 yuan ($3) Every weekend he returned home to wash clothes, cook meals, and care for his mother.

Academically, however, he moved with astonishing speed. By high school, Pang was not merely a top student — he won national awards in mathematics, physics, and biology competitions, a combination rare enough to shock educators across Hebei Province.

II/

In 2017, he entered the national college entrance exam and scored among the very top students. He was admitted to Tsinghua University’s Department of Precision Instrumentation.

At first, Pang assumed he would need to work multiple jobs to survive in Beijing. But Qiu Yong, then president of Tsinghua, personally visited Pang’s home in Hebei and made a simple promise: no student at Tsinghua would drop out because of poverty. The school would provide Pang with financial aid to cover the tuition and living expenses.

Still, Tsinghua was a shock. Pang later admitted that for the first time, he felt intellectually challenged — not by life, but by peers as gifted as himself. A professor named Shi Zongkai offered him a crucial insight: the purpose of university is not to be good at everything, but to discover what you are uniquely good at, and pursue it relentlessly.

The idea changed him. Pang stabilized. He improved every year. He won the university’s Academic Progress Award four consecutive times, served as a class leader, and paid for much of his education through scholarships and work-study programs. When offered financial aid, he voluntarily gave it up, believing other students needed it more.

Then, during his junior year, tragedy returned.

His mother fell gravely ill and passed away at 48 years old. Pang later recalled seeing, for the first time, the deep wounds her body had carried in silence. The day before she died, sensing the end, she called Pang and his grandmother to her bedside. She spoke little — except for one thing she could not let go of: her worry for her son. Giving birth to and raising her son was the meaning of her life.

Pang continued.

He was accepted into a combined master’s–PhD program at Tsinghua. Before even completing his doctorate, he broke through a key technological bottleneck in precision instrumentation — a field where China still relies heavily on imports, including medical imaging and high-end diagnostic equipment. He published an important paper. He secured invention patents.

Globally, many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for the creation of a single groundbreaking instrument. That is how strategic this field is.

Today, Pang Zhongwang works quietly within that strategic domain as a top scientist. He speaks often about responsibility, about how each generation inherits unfinished tasks, and how scientific independence is not abstract, but practical and urgent.

Western sanctions and technological containment were designed around a simple assumption: that a country emerging from poverty and historical ignorance could be permanently locked out of the highest levels of science. China broke that assumption through its people — determined scientists forged in conditions far harsher than any trade restriction. One of them is Pang Zhongwang. Born into utter poverty, raised by a mother with no legs and no schooling, and growing up in a family shadowed by repeated outbreaks of illness, Pang’s rise to the frontiers of precision science is not just a personal story. It reflects how China, within a single generation, moved from scarcity to abundance, from dependence to self-reliance — almost a miracle, but in fact the cumulative result of millions of lives that refused to surrender to circumstance.

He was raised by a mother who had no legs, no education, no complaints — yet taught him poetry. dignity and serenity. That, more than anything else, may explain why Pang Zhongwang has achieved so much. His name Pang Zhongwang means "The Expectation of the Village”. He has fulfilled the expectations, not just of the family and the village but the whole nation. He is one of the top Chinese scientists working hard to break the Western sanctions on China.

Also on Substack. I’ve temporarily turned off paid subscriptions of Substack. However if you’d like to support my work, you can buy me a coffee at: ko-fi.com/americachinawa…

open.substack.com/pub/roquesren/…

Read 4 tweets

America-China Watcher

@PandemicTruther

Dec 11, 2025

Cat Playing With Its Mouse: The Meaning Behind China’s Radar Lock on Japan’s F-15J on December 6th

There is real tension in the air between Japan and China. Washington is slowly retreating from the Western Pacific, abandoning the region to Japan and telling it to hold the line alone. The world has shifted. There was a time when China was weak and poor, when every bully felt entitled to trample it. Those days are over. China rose for one purpose: to never again be abused and bullied. And now, strong and self-assured, China can finally settle accounts with the old tormentors — and Japan is at the top of that list.

But the age of war has changed. The modern battlefield is not measured by bayonets or trenches, but by fire-control radars, AI-driven targeting systems, and the kind of technological superiority that lets you toy with your opponent without firing a shot.

And this is exactly what unfolded on December 6.

The Fire-Control Radar Incident: A Gun to the Forehead

Koizumi Shinzorō, Japan’s Prime Minister, wanted confrontation, and China responded with precision. On December 6, Japan’s Defense Minister publicly admitted that J-15s launched from the Liaoning carrier had twice locked Japan’s F-15Js with fire-control radar over the high seas southeast of Okinawa. He called it “dangerous” and expressed “deep regret.”

He is right to feel danger.
This was no accident, no miscalculation.
This was the PLA presenting a complete offensive posture, signaling that the region is one fingertip away from war — and China is fully prepared to exercise their rights under UN Charter Article 107.

Most people have no idea how deadly serious “fire-control illumination” is.

Japan’s F-15J pilot certainly knew: his cockpit must have exploded into warning alarms; Imagine that shrill beeping screaming through the cockpit for half an hour - enough to drive any normal person mad; his breathing must have turned shallow; his hands probably shook as he tried to maneuver away from the lock.

However, even under that level of crushing psychological pressure, the Japanese pilot chose to stay inside the zone rather than fleeing. This is kamicaze level provocation.

Because the moment fire-control goes live, the radar narrows into a focused beam, feeding exact parameters to the missile under the jet’s wing. In peacetime exercises, a sustained lock counts as a confirmed kill. In real combat, nobody activates it unless they are ready to shoot.

And China kept that beam on the F-15J for over half an hour.

First lock: 16:32–16:35, three full minutes.

Second lock: 18:37–19:08, more than thirty minutes.

There is no suspense about how this confrontation would end in a real war. It would be a guaranteed kill.

The Cat and the Mouse

To be precise, the J-15 wasn’t merely locking and unlocking. It was playing — the way a cat toys with a mouse trapped under its paw.

Japan’s F-15J was that mouse.

II/

Once locked, the cockpit becomes a Christmas tree of warnings; the RWR screams in the pilot’s helmet; adrenaline spikes; the mind panics. The mouse claws at the cage, tries to wriggle free, tries to break the lock. But every attempt fails because the cat simply tightens its grip.

Half an hour like this.
Half an hour of Japanese pilot gasping, sweating, trying to break free — and failing.

A cornered mouse usually lashes out. It bites. It fights.
But Japan didn’t.

A mouse locked for thirty minutes without firing means one of three things:

1. The pilot has nerves of steel — unlikely.

2. The pilot has given up — even more unlikely.

3. The pilot was ordered before takeoff not to fire under any circumstances.

This is why China locked Japan for thirty full minutes:
to raise the temperature, to test the threshold, to force choices.

Japan now has only two options:

Kneel and beg for de-escalation, or

Fire the first shot — and face the consequences.

Koizumi Shinzorō can bow, but Japan As a nation cannot. Japan cannot afford humiliation. In its own geopolitical psychology, it must thrash, it must provoke, it must pretend it still has teeth.

But China is the cat now.
Japan is the mouse.

And the mouse knows the cage door is closing.

Historical Pattern

Japanese pilots edging closer, provoking first, and then blaming China for “aggressiveness”—this is an old pattern wearing new clothes. Anyone who sees this radar-illumination incident as ordinary friction is missing the point. What alarms the Chinese people is not the confrontation, but the déjà-vu of history.

The Liaoning Carrier's military exercise and itinerary was planned in advance, publicly announced, carried out in international waters. Yet under these clear conditions, Japanese fighters chose to close in, shadow at close distance, then accuse China afterward with a vague claim of “being dangerously illuminated.” Anyone who understands air combat knows ordinary search and track modes are basic survival; the only thing that signals attack intent is full guidance lock, a point Japan avoids to discuss entirely. And if they truly believed they were under attack, would a Japanese jet loiter for thirty minutes? Of course not.

Their mission was deliberate prolonged provocation. They could have left the exercise zone at any time—beyond it, China’s radar would have ceased tracking.

The real issue is why Japan keeps pushing this close—close enough to squeeze out even the margin for miscalculation. This combination of probing forward while claiming victimhood is a copy-paste of history.

In 1931, Japan’s frontline soldiers in Manchuria repeatedly advanced, creating friction with Chinese forces. They then claimed they were “checking if the South Manchuria Railway bridge had been destroyed”—a pretext to justify a full-scale military invasion. This was the Mukden Incident (also called the Manchurian Incident), which gave Japan the excuse to seize large swaths of Chinese territory, starting a campaign that ultimately reshaped Northeast Asia.

Two years later, in 1933, tensions simmered again along the northern borders, culminating in the Marco Polo Bridge Incident in 1937. Japanese units conducted repeated standoffs, tests, and provocations near the bridge outside Beijing, inching forward step by step. When a staged gunshot occurred, it was used to claim Chinese hostility, instantly escalating into full-blown war—the start of the Second Sino-Japanese War.

III/

History never needs to repeat exact details; it repeats logic. The same pattern—gradual advance, close monitoring, minor provocation, followed by an accusation of victimhood—is playing out again. Japan’s modern air maneuvers, edging closer under the pretense of routine patrols while claiming to be “illuminated” by Chinese radar, echo this very historical choreography.

Japan also has a long history of turning careful planning and provocation into sudden, devastating strikes. Beyond the Manchurian and Marco Polo Bridge incidents, this pattern appeared in 1941 at Pearl Harbor, when Japanese carriers launched a surprise attack on the U.S. Pacific Fleet, claiming strategic necessity while the target had no warning. Similar tactics occurred in 1942 at the Battle of Singapore, where Japanese forces advanced rapidly, exploiting underestimation and hesitation, and in countless other early campaigns in Southeast Asia. The pattern is clear: inching forward, probing defenses, testing reactions, then striking with sudden force when conditions seem favorable, leaving the opponent scrambling and the narrative framed as “unexpected aggression.” It is a methodical approach that mixes calculated risk with political theater, designed to seize initiative while avoiding blame - exactly the logic mirrored in Japan’s modern maneuvers near Chinese waters.

History never repeats detail for detail; it repeats method. And the method here is familiar.

That is why China’s response is calm but unambiguous. Asking Japan to restrain its frontline units is not a polite suggestion - it is a line drawn with full awareness of what similar frontline provocations have led to in the past. China has paid for this pattern once; it will not be lured into it again.

China dislikes war, but China does not fear war. What China rejects is the old trap: being provoked step by step, then blamed for the outcome. If anyone insists on repeating that script, they should remember how the last performance ended—and who paid the price.

Read 7 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

America-China Watcher

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @PandemicTruther

America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher

America-China Watcher

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!