Surprisingly, a look at the weekly new case load reveals that notwithstanding the public perception to the contrary, Mumbai has managed to keep the numbers almost constant across five weeks. @orfonline
Despite a worrying rise in cases in the 1st half of the Unlock period which caused administrative panic, Delhi too was able to bring down the level of new infections through well-coordinated efforts between the Delhi government, the Central govt, and the MCD. @orfonline
A look at death data from the five weeks of Unlock shows that after the nightmarish week of 10-17 June, the number of deaths have certainly come down in both Mumbai and Delhi. @orfonline
While testing numbers in Delhi have seen substantial improvement ( yes, more than half of it is rapid antigen tests) over the Unlock period, testing in Mumbai seems to have stagnated, and is, in fact, going down. @orfonline
It is clear that aggressive testing and contact tracing have helped Delhi bring down the positivity rate, and the spread of the virus itself, even if possible false negatives may have exaggerated the fall. @orfonline
However, it is of great concern that the stagnation in testing numbers in Mumbai is paralleled by a rapidly increasing test positivity rate, currently nearing 38%, which means that Mumbai is still finding one positive case for every three tests done. @orfonline
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot being written about Brazilian regulator "rejecting" Covaxin. I'll wait for more information to emerge to ensure larger pharma interests are not in play.
3 factors:
1) WHO's BB inspection didnt find anything. 2) Lower half of the map 3) Read paper(gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/…)
1: WHO's inspection report of @BharatBiotech's facilities (who.int/immunization_s…) . They seemed happy. Now, unless things degraded fast, I'm surprised why Brazilian team would find anything fishy.
Brazil was the ONLY prominent developing country opposed to India and South Africa's joint proposal to the WTO against vaccine monopolies. The strange map says it all.
It’s now become fashionable to act as if the early & decisive lockdown was an unmitigated disaster. However, the aim of the lockdown was to hit a pause button in a time of almost complete uncertainty. It helped the health system prepare well. 2/n
It can be debated how it was implemented, whether we dragged on for too long, etc. But at that point in time,the lockdown, a blunt instrument was all we had to keep damage low & to buy time. Now, armed with low mortality stats, we cannot complain it didnt eradicate the virus. 3/n
I remember answering long questions from the author of this piece. Guess they didn't find my inputs on the invisible (& imaginary for now)catastrophe alarmist enough.
The official response from The Hindu on #KuchBhiResearch is based on a strawman argument. It asserts that the flawed method was called "fudging of data". NO.
The "experts" systematically used wrong data to overestimate multiplication factor and published wrong numbers.@orfonline
"One can differ with the writers’ methodology & their estimate, which is based on a raw factor of multiplication and ...... but that does not diminish their plea for a robust health data system."
Talk about how charlatans hijack a genuine demand from researchers for data release.