When we started back in 2014-15, we were well aware that dentistry was primed for such a product.
Knowing how our product has evolved, we are well aware now that we can deploy this to outpatient dental practices after building in the necessary features.
It's a breach of trust that is still difficult for doctors to digest. I'm not surprised it happened to dentists too
This obviously is fundamentally about data ownership.
This is where I and my fellow co-founders of SlashDr differ from your POV.
The doctor (or dentist) and the EHR vendor are just custodians of that data.
This is in line with the Govt of India's health data privacy policies.
Some legislation is yet to be enacted by parliament, but I believe it's only a matter of time before these policies become law.
First: local servers vs cloud. Obviously this relates to the concern about data theft.
EHR developers worth their salt will tell you cloud is easier & cheaper especially for OP practices.
From personal experience as a doctor (not an EHR co-founder) I'll tell you to beware of such single payment solutions.
From personal experience and from being involved in EHR development, I feel that a subscription model serves the interest of both the vendor and customer. This is, of course, my personal opinion.
Also copying @afterdark0600 and @VaradhKrish.
But he is too busy doing important #Covid19 work for @icmr_nie. If he has the time, he will also chime in.
End.