Thread by @marvisirmed

I'd beg to differ on the view that military estab is upset over the "performance" of PTI govt.
1- military was completely in the know of what IK can or can not accomplish.Yet it implemented its elaborate plan of installing PTI govt. Means performance doesn't matter for estab
1/n

https://twitter.com/TalatHussain12/status/1282735762144976899

2- For estab, PTI govt hasn't created any problems or disappointments. In fact, military's influence over political domain has increased by leaps and bounds. Why would estab go against it?
3- The plan for hybrid regimes was to install the puppets with mediocre intelligence
2/n

Because that's how you keep the facade of democracy while gradually eroding its popular appeal. You use a nut case like IK having single track brain unable to deal with complex ideas so that you could discredit entire political class.
4- On points 2 and 3, PTI's performance
3/n

Has been par excellence. Plus
5- A facade of civilian govt provides excellent cover for the selfish distribution of resources imposed by estab. Why would army discuss busting this facade?
6- A docile civilian facade fulfils all domestic, strategic, international objectives.
4/n

Why would a power hungry Bajwa doctrine would even think about an internal "chatter" against such a govt?
7- But the feelers about such a chatter dont actually hurt. They are throwing these 'feelers' in the voluble market because it creates an illusion of an army that cares and

And a govt that is incapable incompetent and useless.

The only problem is, this govt was installed and is continuing because just one factor: Military establishment!

So no STH, I'm sure you e been told about such a chatter but I dont believe it exists. Doesn't make sense.