Lots of talk about “skipping the phase III” trials of #COVID19#vaccines and going straight to widespread vaccination.
Here’s a not-so-brief thread on why that’s a terrible idea.
1/
Ethical considerations aside, there are several reasons we *need* phase 3 trials as part of a developing COVID vaccines:
* Prove Efficacy
* Ensure Safety
* Conserve Limited resources
* Preserve Public confidence
2/
Efficacy
Despite efforts to develop vaccines against other coronaviruses (SARS, MERS) we haven’t yet succeeded
Against SARS-CoV2 we are trying a myriad of strategies: mRNA, recombinant, viral vectors, inactivated, etc. We hope one will succeed, but we don’t yet know which one 3/
Most new therapeutics don’t succeed in development. Much of this selection occurs early, but as this Sankey diagram from @nytimes@stuartathompson shows, almost half of new drugs fail while in phase 3. nytimes.com/interactive/20… 4/
Turning to vaccines. No mRNA vaccine has ever been successfully developed.
Pre-clinical efficacy (producing antibodies) does not ensure clinical efficacy, and unfortunately there is ample precedent for promising vaccines to fail in phase III.
5/
For example, a promising HIV vaccine failed due to lack of efficacy after a n=3000 phase 3 trial. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Similarly, several promising RSV vaccines have failed to reach an efficacy endpoint in phase III trials pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27903593/
6/
Furthermore, with multiple candidate COVID vaccines, we need Phase III results to choose between them. Without phase III data we could easily mass produce the less effective (or ineffective) vaccine.
7/
Getting this wrong would be catastrophic.
Widespread administration of an ineffective vaccine could increase risk taking behaviors, potentially making the pandemic worse.
It would also make it difficult (or impossible) to enroll further studies.
8/
Safety
Vaccine safety is not a mere technicality. Approved vaccines are extremely safe precisely because they go through rigorous late stage testing.
Though rare, serious safety signals have been uncovered in late stage trials.
9/
This @US_FDA report outlines 22 case studies of therapies that appeared promising after phase II but failed in phase III (including 5 vaccines).
Most fail for efficacy, however, the greatest fear is that a novel vaccine could actually worsen #COVID19 fda.gov/media/102332/d…
10/
For example, Merck’s V710 vaccine against s. aureus not only failed at reducing post-op infections it actually *increased* risk of multi-organ failure & death among those who acquired staph infection in the vaccine group compared to placebo. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25483690/
11/
#Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is a phenomenon whereby low titers of antibody can potentiate viral infection, potentially *exacerbating* disease.
The risk of ADE in human coronavirus is uncertain, and is probably low.
But in a disease like #COVID with such prominent immune pathology we should be cautious, especially since Vaccines against Feline Coronaviruses have been shown to exacerbate inflammation via ADE.
13/
Although lack of efficiency is probably the biggest risk, given the potential hazard of ADE (and other adverse effects), its crucial to verify safety before proceeding with widespread vaccination.
14/
Wasting resources
Vaccinating 330 million Americans will be a momentous logistical challenge.
Some vaccines require 2 injections a mo apart.
Manufacturing, shipping, & administering 2/3 of a billion doses is non-trivial. Imagine screwing it up and having to do it twice?
15/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In confronting COVID misinformation I’ve mostly focused on inpatient treatment (this is my area of experience).
Recently I saw the FLCCC Long COVID “protocol” & oh boy is this some crazy non-evidence based prescriptions: HIV meds, steroids, diuretics, & of course ivermectin… 1/
First off, Long COVID is definitely “real” & can be severe.
Many studies have found persistent changes in immune cell phenotype & function, months after COVID infection.
Many great docs (@WesElyMD & others) are actively researching long COVID to improve our understanding.
2/
What concerns me is FLCC presenting “protocols” as proven treatments for long COVID.
Throwing 20 medications (9 are prescription 🟥) at a problem with minimal (or no) evidence is irresponsible. nature.com/articles/s4159…
As we will see, this is both unethical & likely harmful. 3/
Instead of proposals to cap RN pay I’d love to see legislation that:
1️⃣mandates safe RN staffing ratios nationwide
2️⃣enacts a “50 state medical license” w/ straightforward reciprocity
3️⃣imposes limits on executive compensation for any hospital/org that bills CMS
For those doubting these reforms are possible. A couple points:
There already is a federal law calling for “adequate numbers of licensed RNs” 42CFR 482.23(b) The issue is that this is too vague.
15 states have passed laws that go further. CA & MA explicitly stipulate RN ratios
The CA law, enacted in 2004, mandates 1 RN to 5 med/surg patients & 1:2 for ICU patients.
After implementation RNs cared for one fewer patient on average. There was a decrease in hospital mortality & increased RN job satisfaction. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
The ivermectin crazies are now recommending hydroxychloroquine too.
Their “protocol” includes a dangerously high dose of diuretics & recommends high dose steroids in people not on supplemental O2.
This has crossed the line from (mostly) harmless nonsense to actual harm.
Supporting Evidence:
A 2021 Cochrane meta-analysis (the 🥇standard) concluded that HCQ “has little or no effect on the risk of death and probably no effect on progression to mechanical ventilation. Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo…”
A more recent meta-analysis in @NatureComms that included unpublished studies went further, concluding “that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients”
Just 3️⃣simple acts of compassion can go a long way
Important RCT just published in @TheLancet shows that a family support strategy consisting of 3 extra family meetings can substantially reduce family grief 6mo after the death of a loved one in the ICU thelancet.com/journals/lance…
1/
Pre-pandemic, ICU mortality was often ~20%
In the US, 30-60% of ICU deaths were preceded by a decision to withdraw life support
We are experts at providing comfort focused care for patients but in many cases, families feel grief months afterwards
What can we do about this? 2/
The COSMIC RCT studied this.
The intervention was 3 family meetings held following a decision to withdraw life support:
1️⃣family conference to prepare relatives for the imminent death
2️⃣ICU-room visit to provide support
3️⃣meeting after death to offer condolences & closure
To those who are unvaccinated because of worries about “unproven mRNA technology” you know you can get:
- the J&J vaccine (🇺🇸)
- the Oxford-AZ vaccine (🇬🇧&🇪🇺)
Both can prevent hospitalization or death from COVID. Neither are mRNA vaccines. So why not get vaxxed today?
To those worried about blood clots after J&J, as of April 2021:
-there were 15 cases of TTS
-out of 8 million J&J doses
The vaccine efficacy (VE) of the J&J vaccine *is* slightly less than the mRNA alternatives: 68-71% VE to prevent hospitalization (compared to ~90% for mRNA vaccines). That’s still much much better than being Unvaxxed.