InfToE Profile picture
11 Aug 20, 20 tweets, 4 min read
1/19 The compression/static/expansion trilemma is meaningless. It comes from the naive worldly idea of the universe as a certain volume of matter existing in space and time. This idea (the same turtle and three whales) brought cosmology even to such funny absurdity: ImageImageImageImage
2/19 To understand what the universe is, first need to clear yourself of the jumble of absurdities that the BBT has turned cosmology into. Take any theory, and if it has in anamnesis the Doppler interpretation of redshift - forget it, this theory is wrong.
3/19 When you free yourself from childhood mistakes, you will have the opportunity to return to the forgotten source: the content of the concept "universe". The universe is everything. Everything that exists is the inner concepts of it. There are no concepts external to it.
4/19 It will be difficult. Of course, we are not talking about God - the creator, this unnecessary idea is not even discussed here.
It is about the rejection of the innate everyday perception of space and time.
5/19 The universe does not exist in space. Space exists in the universe. Space is a consequence of the existence of the universe.
6/19 The universe does not exist in time. Time exists in the universe. Time is a consequence of the existence of the universe. (At the same time, you will have to revise the concept of "existence", since in everyday life this is an intratemporal process.)
7/19 Following this, you must convince yourself that all other concepts, whatever they may be, are all internal to the universe. All of them are only consequences. Even math, which we regard as the language of describing universes, is an internal concept of the only one universe.
8/19 Even before this stage, you will realize how ridiculous the compression/static/expansion trilemma is.
But the importance of this stage is that you will learn to detect fictitious theories by the criterion of the presence of "godgifts" in them.
9/19 Every concept used by a scientific theory must be substantiated, otherwise the theory is unscientific.
For example, classical materialism is unscientific, because it is based on the concept of "matter" with many complex properties, the set of which is godgift.
10/19 You will formulate a requirement for a theory of everything: it is a theory, all concepts used by which are substantiated within this theory.
E.g., the string theory will never become a theory of everything, because it is based on godgifts: strings, vibrations...
11/19 So you will come to the understanding that for not to operate with godgifts, the ToE must be absolutely, extremely, terminally simple. Everything that is complex in the universe should ultimately consist of something extremely simple, simpler than which nothing exists.
12/19 In your search for a terminally simple basis, you will begin to decompose everything in the universe into simpler components. And as a result of this process, you will find that this terminally simple is information. The universe is only information and nothing else.
13/19 Strict proof that the universe is only information fits into one tweet:
14/19 Based on this knowledge, you will synthesize an information theory of everything, consisting of theory of complexity, theory of observations, and theory of realization.
Theory of realization will explain you how the universe (absurdly called "observable") works.
15/19 The further you look into the depths of the evolving universe, the deeper its past you observe, and the slower the observed time flows in it. The slowing down of the passage of time that is the cause of the redshift, and not the Doppler effect.
16/19 Theory of realization will tell you a lot.
But among other things, it will explain you that humanity has a fundamental role in the universe. And that since the universe exists, humanity has successfully fulfilled this role in the future, and will complete its existence.
17/19 And, since the role is fulfilled, it does not matter at all whether humanity understands the nature of the universe, or it will remain in the midst of the pile of nonsenses of TBB.
18/19 Neanderthals played their evolutionary role, throwing stone spears at Cro-Magnons, without needing to understand Newtonian mechanics. Likewise, we will pass the baton of evolution to AI, not understanding the informational nature of the universe.
19/19 Coming back to your question.
The size of the universe is fixed, it is the same physical constant as the speed of light in vacuum, absolute zero, Planck's constant or the age of the universe. This is not a banal boundary in space, but the unattainable mathematical limit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with InfToE

InfToE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @inftoe

15 Jul
The idea for this thread came from this short dialogue with @Elisabe09456260 in the thread about @elonmusk's attempt to save humanity:
Colleague expresses the opinion that increasing entropy will eventually eliminate everything in the universe.
1 ᐅ
This is a very interesting opinion indeed.
And first of all, it is interesting in attitude to this problem in modern physics. Modern physics is little shy about this topic.
Because it is very inconvenient not to have a clear answer to a such simple question.
2 ᐅ
This question sounds like this: "Will the heat death of the universe occur: yes or no?"
If you ask physicist, he will do everything not to answer. He will discourse a lot, deeply explain, refer to the history and latest research, but you shouldn't expect neither yes nor no.
3 ᐅ Image
Read 70 tweets
8 Jun
Some (few) people are wondering: why is Elon Musk @elonmusk going to send a million people to Mars in the next 40 years, and why is preparing for this with such energy, which (if to leave aside the charm of achievements of this very extraordinary person) is more like a rush?
1> Image
@elonmusk We visited the Moon half a century ago and since then have done quite well without far space flights. Is it possible that such a waste of funds and efforts is simply explained by the fact that one enthusiast was carried away by the idea of giving humanity a multi-planetary?
2> Image
A fleet of 1000 #Starship, 3 launches per day, difficulties and suffering in flight and in life in the colony, losses ... Expenses with which even the Sahara or Antarctica can turn into a paradise for the same people. And all this for what? Just out of principle, let it be?
3> Image
Read 144 tweets
1 Mar
Why does quantum gravity (and, accordingly, graviton) not exist, and all theories professing this idea are fictitious? Because the nature of the gravitational interaction, with all the kinship with the other three (quantized), is still somewhat different.
1/39 Image
Like everything in the information universe, fundamental interactions are the derivatives of the metric of the universe. It is it that determines their number - four - and the basic features of each of them.
2/39 Image
The metric of the universe is determined by the third level of combinations of the beings of the universe (more on this here:
3/39
Read 40 tweets
8 Aug 20
Since the universe is unknowable to the individual, believing is an integral part of consciousness. This applies to scientific consciousness in full.
But scientific belief should not contradict physics. Image
Belief in aliens is no different from religion: it is just as unscientific, because it contradicts the special theory of relativity. Image
No movement in the space of the universe can occur faster than the speed of light. This means that neither interstellar travel nor inter-civilization contacts are possible. Image
Read 8 tweets
16 Jul 20
1. Why does the universe exists as we observe it, that is, progressing from simple states to more and more complex ones?
This thread complements the answer to the question about the cause of the universe existing given in the earlier thread. Image
2. The idea for this new thread came in a dream. The brain, accustomed to everyday perception of reality, is not satisfied with a strictly formal answer, and, without asking the owner's opinion, seeks more worldly arguments for the same conceptual basis. Image
3. The conceptual basis is defined in another earlier thread related to the first: the universe is only information and nothing else.
Image
Read 15 tweets
22 Jan 20
1. The idea of ​​this thread is inspired by a fun model of the universe running away over the horizon, discussed by @StartsWithABang.

This thread answers the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. And this is not 42.
2. If we are talking about the universe, then the only question that makes sense is: why does the universe exist. All other questions (i.e. how it exists) are consequences of it. If your cosmology does not answer this question, it is not cosmology.
3. The Big Bang Theory does not answer the question of why the universe exists. Therefore, neither it nor the countless daughter theories built on it are cosmology. They are fundamentally naught, even when consistent with observations.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(