For @AIGemea#GlobalTradeSeries 2020 I had the pleasure of talking to @ignaciobercero & @elvirefabry abt the EU’s trade strategy amid US-Chinese tensions, Covid19, & how the EU can avoid the lure of protectionism & build domestic support for trade.
Key points below.
In response to Covid: “reshoring is unlikely to go very far in the EU”, said Ignacio.
EU too dependent on exports & it’s difficult to localize value chains. But there will be more talk abt strategic stockpiles, diversification of value chains (e.g w Africa) and subsidies.
/2
Ignacio also offered 3 scenarios the EU shd prepare for in light of US-Chinese trade tensions:
1) decoupling, 2) exclusionary trade alliances, tho no decoupling 3) a push for WTO reform.
The EU prefers option 3, obvs.
/3
But what should the EU do?
Ignacio:
-Engage, engage, engage w the WTO
-Build alliances with like-minded countries
-Deliver on bilateral FTAs
-Promote regulatory cooperation & don’t rely too much on the Brussels effect (h/t @anubradford).
...
/4
Digital and climate are areas where the EU could lead the way, said Elvire and Ignacio.
En plus:
-Develop WTO-compatible trade defense instruments, such as:
oReciprocity in public procurement
oStrengthening investment screening
/5
On US & Chinese trade assertiveness on trade:
The EU will have to manage the tension between its desire to promote open, rules-based multilateral trade, and the need to protect its interests.
EU needs strong trade defense instruments, but it also needs to back WTO reform.
/6
“WTO reform is not just about a level playing field with China. But also about meeting SDGs.” The EU should push for stronger trade rules on sustainability.
And as Elvire mentions, the window of opportunity of the “Brussels effect” may not last forever.
/7
And so the EU should move to update global trade rules now.
Aside from the WTO route, the Franco-Dutch non-paper on #sustainability & #trade is a way to leverage EU market power to promote sustainability goals.
Domestic politics play a role in this too. Publics see sustainability and trade as incompatible.
Parliaments are sceptical abt trade liberalisaton: see NL & #CETA, FR & #TTIP.
The Franco-Dutch paper is a welcome response.
/9
@EmmanuelMacron wants a “European trade policy that protects without protectionism”.
This applies sustainability, but also to digital trade and fair taxation.
Key element is that the EU and national govts should make the public case for trade better.
/10
Ignacio: “50% of #TTIP time was spent on explaining to publics.”
These public discussions need to happen early on. Continuous engagement is necessary, not just when an FTA has been negotiated. And it’s not just a matter for the Commission, but also for the member-states.
/11
Ultimately, Q for @DGtrade and MS is "Can Europe offer a Third Way on trade betw the US and China?"
Is the EU dependent on what Washington and Beijing do, or can the EU be the shaper of its trade destiny, with global rules and norms being protected? That's the challenge.
/12
We have a new Dutch 🇳🇱 coalition agreement!
Here are some highlights with an international/ EU dimension:
Defence
- Continued military, political & financial support for #Ukraine
- Legally enshrine 2% defence spending
- Support for NL & European defence industry
/1
Migration
- NL will seek opt-out for (parts of) European asylum/migration policy, and will discuss setting up mini-Schengen’s in times of crisis
- NL will work with EU members to externalise migration policy to 3rd countries
/2
Migration (cont'd)
- NL will seek limits to freedom of movement for new EU members (i.e. same thing that happened in 2004)
- Various measures to dissuade migration, including fewer international students in Bachelors programmes, except technical studies
/3
1) EU's timing was totally off, at least if it wanted a positive response frm London. Perhaps BXL's timing had more to do w VDL extending a hand to the UK at the end of her term. In any case it had little to do with political realities in London
/1
This suggests either VDL came up with the idea herself, or she was poorly advised by @PedroSerranoEU's team in London (which I don’t believe as they are highly competent)
Is there another option?
/2
@PedroSerranoEU .@anandMenon1 suggests here that the Commission wanted to pre-empt bilateral efforts by individual member-states
Plausible. Tho I haven’t heard many Europeans talk about bilateral deals with the UK on visas and youth mobility (aside from the French)
/3 theguardian.com/politics/2024/…
"As a result of the staggering implementation failures of the past six years, we have so far borne the costs of leaving the EU - the majority of which were the result of a choice by vindictive European protectionists...
/2
"...rather than the necessary outcome of leaving - while only enjoying a small fraction of the possible benefits."
Interesting perspective: trade barriers r blamed on 'European protectionists' instead of the logical outcome of leaving an internal market. But OK.
Or rather, I read @stephenfry’s highly enjoyable version “Troy”
Here are a couple of points with some relevance to today’s war in #Ukraine
A short 🧵(with some classical art)
/1
Who is to blame for the war, and at what point did it become inevitable?
Was it the Trojan abduction of Helen, the judgement of Paris, the lottery Odysseus organised, Paris’ and Antimachus' undermining of the Greek ultimatum?...
/2
Or was it the challenge Troy presented to Agamemnon’s hegemony as “king of men”....
... or the Greek pursuit of Troy’s spoils?
In the case of Russia vs Ukraine, we also see multiple reasons being debated, some more realistic than others.
If the West doesn’t want to get directly involved in Ukraine, it has two options:
-Arm Ukraine
-Use economic tools of coercion (sanctions)
We are doing the first. But the second remains tricky.
Some thoughts on economic sanctions.
A thread. 🧵
/1
If you are serious about using sanctions as a tool, you also accept harming your own economy.
Imposing sanctions ALWAYS means striking a balance between the amount of economic pain you are willing to absorb versus the amount of economic pain you can inflict on the other.
/2
Examples.
Personal sanctions are relatively painless; their impact is also limited.
Prohibiting sales of luxury goods is bad for oligarchs and bad for LVMH, but probably won’t lead to a change in behaviour either.