Profile picture
, 5 tweets, 3 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
- The @WHO named #COVID19 on February 11, 2020.

- The @WorldBank has listed tens of millions of U.S. Dollars in trade value for the "COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Instruments and Apparatus" (product code 902780) going back to 2017.

Why?

(I took these screen shots - data is there.)
For those eager to fact check, no problem.

2017: wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade…

2018: wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade…

2016 (no trade value posted): wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade…
Investigating further, there are two more Product Codes (382200 and 300215), both COVID-19 test kit related, all with trade values going back to 2017.
There is a potential theory/explanation that the World Bank renamed a product code to specify COVID-19 test kits. However, what are the odds they renamed numerous codes that had data only beginning in 2017 but not 2016?

I have written the World Bank to see if they can clarify.
MORE:

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 T̷h̷e̷ ̷B̷l̷a̷c̷k̷ ̷V̷a̷u̷l̷t̷ 🇺🇸

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Related hashtags

#COVID19

More from @blackvaultcom see all

Profile picture
T̷h̷e̷ ̷B̷l̷a̷c̷k̷ ̷V̷a̷u̷l̷t̷
@blackvaultcom
1/8 I am RT'ing this for 1) thread capability but 2) I was unaware my overall stance was such an unknown (pun intended) to some out there. However, reading this, I can understand why given my current skepticism towards the present day #UFO hot topics. So, I am HAPPY to address...
2/8 I wrote a book about how the U.S. government/military has lied about this topic. (Shameless plug, but stay with me). I spent 20+ years of my life researching what went in there, and I feel comfortable stating that a) there is a #UFO coverup. b) I can prove the coverup...
3/8 easier than any other topic I've researched. c) Whatever the phenomena is; it's can be a threat (Yes, I agree w/ you @TTSAcademy and have since you began that narrative) and d) whatever the phenomena is; it's an ongoing potential threat, and the U.S. military needs to take...
Read 9 tweets
Profile picture
T̷h̷e̷ ̷B̷l̷a̷c̷k̷ ̷V̷a̷u̷l̷t̷
@blackvaultcom
1/6 - If you believe former Senator Harry Reid in his interview with George Knapp, you must accept the huge possibility #AAWSAP/#AATIP was a "sweetheart deal" from the Senator of Nevada to a Nevada corporate donor, Robert Bigelow.

Find here the original "objective" for AAWSAP.
2/6 - It's safe to say what you see here is not a #UFO program, despite what Senator Reid said.

So, what are the odds that the above "objective" was all secret coded language to represent #UFOs, and by chance the ONLY bidder for the contract - was Bigelow Aerospace from Nevada?
3/6 - Though some will argue #AAWSAP is not #AATIP (and that has been reported), you then need to completely disregard Dr. Hal Puthoff's statement about what #AATIP really was, which agrees with the Pentagon stance given to @rogerglassel.

And that is the conundrum...
Read 7 tweets
Profile picture
T̷h̷e̷ ̷B̷l̷a̷c̷k̷ ̷V̷a̷u̷l̷t̷
@blackvaultcom
It is proven beyond a doubt, that @alejandrotrojas changed the dates/order of emails to fit a narrative, writing Mr. Elizondo responded to an email a day before it was written.

This isn't an honest mistake; it's a track record of bad "reporting."

Yet I am accused of "spin" 👍
@alejandrotrojas .@alejandrotrojas also wrote an article completely omitting a statement I got from the Pentagon, that specifically addresses his spin. How do I know he knew about it? He responded to it when I posted it on Twitter. He THEN wrote his article spinning the narrative and left it out.
@alejandrotrojas In case anyone is wondering - this is the simple statement he omitted from his article...
Read 10 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!