,
10 tweets,
6 min read
Read on Twitter
It is proven beyond a doubt, that @alejandrotrojas changed the dates/order of emails to fit a narrative, writing Mr. Elizondo responded to an email a day before it was written.
This isn't an honest mistake; it's a track record of bad "reporting."
Yet I am accused of "spin" 👍
This isn't an honest mistake; it's a track record of bad "reporting."
Yet I am accused of "spin" 👍
@alejandrotrojas .@alejandrotrojas also wrote an article completely omitting a statement I got from the Pentagon, that specifically addresses his spin. How do I know he knew about it? He responded to it when I posted it on Twitter. He THEN wrote his article spinning the narrative and left it out.
@alejandrotrojas In case anyone is wondering - this is the simple statement he omitted from his article...
@alejandrotrojas .@alejandrotrojas cited a DOD Instruction to spin a completely false narrative about information released "without restriction" when it is stamped "Cleared for OPEN publication".
Yet, when fact checking via his own hyperlink, he is proven 100% wrong there is no match whatsoever.
Yet, when fact checking via his own hyperlink, he is proven 100% wrong there is no match whatsoever.
@alejandrotrojas .@alejandrotrojas attempts to spin a narrative that DOPSR either grants public release, or does not. There is no middle ground, ie: a clearance for specific use like "government use only."
Yet at DOPSR's homepage clearly states they grant controlled releases, ie: USG use only.
Yet at DOPSR's homepage clearly states they grant controlled releases, ie: USG use only.
@alejandrotrojas To further prove the point, Mr. Luis Elizondo attempts to change the usage to "unrestricted" further proving that "section 3" on a DD Form 1910 actually means something.
(There is no evidence the NAVY responded to Russo's request for clearance to the public.)
(There is no evidence the NAVY responded to Russo's request for clearance to the public.)
@alejandrotrojas The SPIN, and the pedestal given to those who masquerade as "journalists" while clearly attempting to achieve a specific agenda by changing facts, dates and information that can easily be verified, has to stop.
The facts are there, if anyone wants to look at them.
The facts are there, if anyone wants to look at them.
@alejandrotrojas To further prove the point, Mr. Luis Elizondo attempts to change the usage to "unrestricted" further proving that "section 3" on a DD Form 1910 actually means something.
(There is no evidence the NAVY responded to Russo's request for clearance to the public.)
(There is no evidence the NAVY responded to Russo's request for clearance to the public.)
The SPIN, and the pedestal given to those who masquerade as "journalists" while clearly attempting to achieve a specific agenda by changing facts, dates and information that can easily be verified, has to stop.
The facts are there, if anyone wants to look at them.
The facts are there, if anyone wants to look at them.
(Sorry for a couple reposts - had to fix the thread, because for some reason, Twitter broke it up. I felt it was important to have it in sequence. Apologies!)
