Remembering @pewresearch founder Andy Kohut on the 5th anniversary of his death today. This @AAPOR heritage interview (w/ @c_deane!) a wonderful way to look back on remarkable life and career. A few highlights for me. Thread 1/n bit.ly/33aq9Tf
Andy started his polling career @Gallup because he and his wife needed $650 to pay the hospital fees for the birth of their first child!
Began as a part-time position in evenings while he was doing graduate studies at Rutgers. 2/n.
He left studies because he was 'learning so much at Gallup' and excited by the variety of the work, including marketing research.
Columbia Pictures was an early client, including survey work on the film Easy Rider! 3/n
On his quick-developing enthusiasm for survey research and its possibilities: "I loved to do experiments!" 4/n.
Fast forward a bit to a chapter that's always fascinated me: Travels across Europe with @madeleine to do focus groups and surveys at end of #ColdWar as #berlinwall was about to fall. 'Pulse of Europe' report, foreshadowed @pewglobal. 5/n pewrsr.ch/2Fb04vl
On first political typology report as early forms of what would become @pewresearch were taking shape: "Do the depth of academic surveys but with focus on the issues of the day." 6/n
On style he developed during Times Mirror Center days ... goal was to be "very comprehensive, do it quickly and write in a way that's *accessible to ordinary people*." 7/n
Chuckled here, re others in space at time of early typology surveys: "There were no competitors."
Reflects state of field then, but Andy was also fiercely proud of his work. Ethic was we were going to put in the work to do it the best and it was going to be the best. Simple. 8/n
Remarkable to see him recall conversation with long-time president of @pewtrusts Rebecca Rimel on need to formalize @pewresearch in a way that would ensure the work continued after their careers wound down. I'd say 💯 on that goal. 9/n.
On survey researchers, @AAPOR, facing challenges to methods: "we're survivors, adaptable."
Even a long-ago mention of the possibilities on non-probability research! 10/n
Profoundly, recalling a phrase George Gallup used to use that guides our work today: "public opinion surveys give voice to the people." What could be more straightforward or more important? 11/n
Andy died in 2015. Many knew him from appearances on @NewsHour@NPR and other media put public opinion into terms people could understand. His legacy is @pewresearch and the furthering of the field of survey research that he loved so much through organizations like @AAPOR 12/n
He was also a mentor and inspiration to many in field today, including me. I'm lucky he took an interest in my early career and among the many things that motivate me @pewresearch is responsibility to carry forward his legacy and meet the expectations he would have for me. 13/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New @pewresearch on trust in scientists out today. Short thread on top findings, including the role Americans want scientists to play in policy debates on #science issues🧵 pewrsr.ch/3USzH0S
76% of Americans have a 'great deal' or a 'fair amount' of confidence in scientists to act in the public's best interests.
Confidence is up slightly (+3pts) in the last year, though it remains lower than levels seen before the pandemic.
A larger majority of Democrats (88%) than Republicans (66%) express confidence in scientists to act in the public's best interest. This partisan gap remains wider than pre-pandemic.
Still, Republican confidence has ticked higher in last year (from 61% to 66%).
Climate change is viewed as an issue that needs attention today and majorities view government, industry -- and even 'ordinary Americans' -- as doing 'too little' to help reduce its effects. 2/x
Americans continue to prioritize alternative energy development (like wind and solar) over fossil fuels, but public is roughly divided over phasing out gas-powered cars by 2035; opposes eliminating fossil fuels from energy picture altogether 3/x
This week @pewresearch released an updated analysis of long-term trends in party identification. It's a great report and a must-read for anyone with an interest in U.S. politics. Let's take a look! (thread) 1/x pewrsr.ch/2z8eSba
The balance of party ID among all U.S. registered voters has been fairly stable. Dems hold 49%-44% edge over GOP in leaned party ID in data running thru 2019. Comparable to other recent moments. But a lot is happening under the hood! 2/x
The gender gap in party ID is now as wide as at any moment in @pewresearch data going back to 1994. Women are 14 pts more likely than men to identify or lean Dem. Avg gap was 9 pts between 1994 and 2014. 3/x
#CoronavirusOutbreak has upended life for Americans of all backgrounds and circumstances. But our @pewresearch polling over last month has found some groups being hit harder than others. Thread on what we've found so far 1/.
From our first survey, we've seen big gaps in personal health concerns. Black and Hispanic Americans have been much more likely than whites to say outbreak is a 'major' threat to their own health. Older adults also more likely to express this than younger adults. 2/.
Negative job impacts from outbreak vary widely across groups. In mid-March, Hispanic adults, younger adults and those with lower incomes were especially likely to say their household had already faced job loss/pay cut. 3/. pewrsr.ch/39Xf8Gx