#COVID19 arrived in the UK *last year*. The finding by the Kent coroner raises many hard questions swerved in this @TheSun piece. A short, sad thread thesun.co.uk/news/12618638/…
One of the hardest questions for me and for many others is whether #Covid19 killed our loved ones. Here's a blog post I wrote in May about the death of my husband @andygangof4 catherinemayer.co.uk/post/2020-visi…
Since I wrote it, many people have been in touch with their own case histories catherinemayer.co.uk/post/2020-visi… Through @CovidJusticeUk I've heard many more stories of people lost to #Covid19-like illness but never tested and so not included in official tolls
Huge sympathy to Jane Buckland who has just learned that #Covid19 was a cause of her father Peter Attwood's death. She is quoted in @TheSun: “Covid has obviously been around for much longer than we know. People have been talking about a cover-up but we don’t know the scale of it"
The article points the finger at China and yes, this is a key question. What was known by whom and when? How differently might this have unfolded if alerts had been sounded earlier and whistleblowing applauded rather than suppressed?
Frankly, this train of thought is unbearable. Because how many lives might have been spared? It is tough enough to mourn @andygangof4 and my stepfather John Bird without wondering if a touch of transparency might have saved them
In @TheSun @MPIainDS also takes a swipe at @WHO. It is "also guilty because they failed to press China back in November and December when it became obvious that China had at least an epidemic on their hands". Again, no argument from me. There are questions to answer here
So many questions and there are so many, too, for the UK government. Yet these are ignored in this report and, crucially, by ministers. This matters not because we who are grieving want someone to blame but BECAUSE WE AIM TO SAVE FURTHER LIVES BY FOSTERING UNDERSTANDING OF #COVID
You cannot make good policy if you ignore the available evidence: the revised timelines, the implied wider prevalence. The @CovidJusticeUk families also have valuable testimony about systemic failings that need urgently to be addressed. Yet @BorisJohnson refuses to meet them
The group is not in legal action against the government. theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
I'll admit it, @BorisJohnson. We *are* scary, we who are grieving. Our emotions are close to the surface. We lack artifice. We have the clarity of grief to know what matters. And what matters is that this government does everything possible to combat #Covid19 and save lives

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catherine Mayer

Catherine Mayer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @catherine_mayer

9 Jan
As you follow the reporting on #Sussexroyal, think about the absences and why they occur. Here’s a big one. And a short #MeghanAndHarry thread
The UK media is structurally racist and sexist as reflected and reinforced by pay and employment gaps. Misogynoir directed at #MeghanMarkle hasn’t just been constant but systemic. However the problems with celebrity & royal coverage, very different, go much deeper
I don’t expect you to feel sorry for celebrities. It’s hard to empathise with their emotional turbulences when so many people are struggling to eat or live. But dehumanising celebrity coverage damages everyone. I wrote this to explain theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2…
Read 11 tweets
5 Dec 19
Today's Sun quotes me on the royals. News outlets often quote me; almost as often the quotes are mangled or made-up. I never ask for corrections; the volume is far too great & the damage at face value vanishingly slight. But is it? A few thoughts...
Let's take a look at where the Sun got its quote. It isn't fully fabricated & the Sun isn't the first offender. It comes from an interview I gave to a documentary maker some years back. It's something I said, not something I wrote. It isn't about or in response to current events
Ground zero is probably a piece in the Express that covers the documentary and makes clear this is a discussion about the young Prince Charles. A subsequent chain of articles removes the quote ever further from that original context
Read 12 tweets
16 Nov 19
Kicking myself for a bad decision. I declined invite from @BBCr4today to discuss Prince Andrew’s #Epstein interview before seeing the interview. But there’s so much to say about the culture of impunity Andrew embodies in this clip alone. A few thoughts...
theguardian.com/uk-news/video/…
@BBCr4today The reason I declined, as I say, is that I hadn't seen the interview. The problem with much discussion of the royals is that it takes place in a vacuum. They are protected by layers of secrecy that don't apply to other institutions. They can't be scrutinised or called to account
@BBCr4today Journalism too often responds to this by operating its own culture of impunity, inventing stuff to fill the vacuum, secure in the knowledge--well, at least until Harry and Meghan broke with tradition--that the royals would not take action
Read 21 tweets
9 Aug 19
THIS IS URGENT. We're heading into a snap election and the laws meant to enable fair elections are hopelessly out of date--a fact being ruthlessly exploited bbc.co.uk/news/entertain…
It isn't just about the lack of transparency on who pays for the ads (and whether the financial sources are legitimate) though that's a huge problem. Money doesn't just talk in the UK political system. It SHOUTS. No smaller parties can compete with this bbc.co.uk/news/technolog…
It's also about the relentless influence of dark ads that evade electoral scrutiny and because of micro targeting are seen only by those thought susceptible to their messages and not to the people who would push back against them bbc.co.uk/news/entertain…
Read 7 tweets
24 Mar 19
If you want to know how our world became so polarised, look at the competing narratives about the #PutitothePeopleMarch. Critics from left and right denounce the marchers as members of an elite. It's worth acknowledging the extent to which that's true--and also true of Brexiteers
Yesterday's march was huge. As a veteran of marches following precisely that route, it was the largest by far that I've seen. After three hours, my group, nowhere near the back of the march, had been able to move only 0.4 miles, from Hyde Park Corner to the start of St James's St
During that time I spoke to people of different life experiences, backgrounds, socio-economic groups, religions, ethnicities, demographics. Quite a few women had to leave the march because they had caring duties. Others had made arrangements for care cover so they could attend
Read 10 tweets
28 Oct 18
It was only banter. Of course. Snowflake women are easily confused. I remember when my boss wrote me a long, explicit letter. Banter. The work meeting with a man whose opening line was “what are the chances we’ll be rolling around in a hotel room in an hour?” #onlybanter
The interviewee who extracted my number from the PR company and wouldn’t stop calling. The colleague who lunged & then accused me of leading him on. The MP who texted about my boots. During Prime Minister’s question time. #onlybanter
I remember so many examples of banter, I couldn’t possibly list them all here. And sure I’ve forgotten many more examples. Either because it’s #onlybanter and doesn’t matter or because one way to cope with the reality of routine unwanted sexual approaches is to try to ignore them
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!