1/STATEMENT REGARDING DHS WHISTLEBLOWER

Attached is a statement pertaining to whistleblower #BrianMurphy regarding his recent complaint to DHS Office of Inspector General.

The text is also reproduced below.
2/Earlier this week, our client Brian Murphy, a member of the Senior Executive Service at the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), filed a whistleblower complaint dated September 8, 2020, with the Department’s Office of Inspector General.
3/The complaint alleges multiple protected disclosures of alleged wrongdoing by various DHS officials at the senior levels. A copy of the complaint was also transmitted to the relevant Congressional oversight authorities.
4/It was brought to our attention that there was a factual error in the complaint pertaining to former DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s Congressional testimony of December 20, 2018, wherein we had asserted she publicly testified ...
5/...that 3,755 known or suspected terrorists had been prevented by DHS from entering the United States. That information, however, was not part of Secretary Nielsen’s public testimony and we regret the inadvertent error.
6/That figure, instead, was part of a power point presentation presented to Congress by the White House, at a meeting which Secretary Nielsen led, on January 3, 2019. whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl… (slide 4).
7/Today, we submitted a supplemental clarification to the DHS OIG and the Congressional oversight committees. As we did not publicize the initial complaint, nor shall we disseminate the supplemental clarification.
8/We are not responsible for any steps Congress may lawfully take with respect to release of the document.
9/Subject to this clarification, Mr. Murphy stands by the substance of his complaint and looks forward to independent, objective investigations by DHS OIG and any interested Congressional committees.
END/

Mark S. Zaid, Esq.John N. Tye, Esq.
Bradley P. Moss, Esq.Kyle D. Gardiner, Esq.
Andrew P. Bakaj, Esq.WHISTLEBLOWER AID
MARK S. ZAID, P.C.
And, of course, I see a typo in the document. Never fails how many times you read it!!! Sigh.
Corrected statement!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark S. Zaid

Mark S. Zaid Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkSZaidEsq

23 Aug
1/I rep many of those @StateDept diplomats suffering adverse effects from #HavanaSyndrome. I candidly don't know what caused it but claiming "mass delusion" explains everything is insulting, to say the least.

I've heard this before:

nationalreview.com/2020/08/book-r…
2/When I rep'd #GulfWarSyndrome (GWS) victims, ppl claimed "mass delusion". We proved it wasn't.

healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hbl…
3/When I rep'd those forced by @DeptofDefense to take #AnthraxVaccine & suffered adverse health effects, ppl claimed "mass delusion". We proved it wasn't.

Even persuaded Fed Judge to impose permanent injunction on grounds of unlawful experimentation.

nbcnews.com/id/6348898/ns/…
Read 12 tweets
18 Jun
(1) THREAD: As I review the Govt's TRO/PI Motion against #Bolton in its civil lawsuit, I will share my thoughts. I have represented countless govt officials in prepub review matters & litigated more cases than anyone. I was also recognized by a Federal Judge as an expert.
(2) Quick analysis: this is unprecedented, meaningless Govt end-run attempt of SCOTUS Pentagon Papers decision to block publication of a book that has countless copies already in public domain. No way media outlets will be blocked from publishing further excerpts.
3) I can think of only one prior successful injunction. In 1979, in US v. Progressive, govt initially blocked art detailing how to build hydrogen bomb. In granting injunction, Judge basically said 1st Amendment of no use if everyone dead.

Turned out, info was already available.
Read 26 tweets
2 Jun
No tear gas? Guess my eyes were captured by ANTIFA technology or I was suffering from LSD hallucinations given I watched it happen live on television.

Where's the Twitter fact check indeed @IngrahamAngle.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jun
I'm watching what's happening live in DC outside WH as military & law enforcement presence ramps up significantly in front of protesters as 7 pm city curfew approaches, and I'm thinking I really, sadly, doubt this is going to end well. Sigh.
Very strange to see #AGBarr standing behind military/law enforcement personnel as if looking over his troops as an actual "General".
Tear gas just fired at what was a peaceful protest all day. Sigh.
Read 6 tweets
26 May
I would like a list of the names of individuals who sought unmasking during this Administration. To make sure of it, we plan to sue USGOVT for them.
Today we learned @StateDept denied our clients' @JMadisonProject & @joshgerstein expedited processing. The ten day period elapses on Friday, June 5th. Congratulations @SecPompeo, you just earned yourself yet another #FOIA lawsuit!
Read 4 tweets
17 May
1/One day perhaps - and it can't come soon enough - people will understand what nonpartisan & independent actually means. Those on right are "surprised" I defended @CBS (former @FoxNews) reporter @CBS_Herridge when she was maliciously & unfairly attacked

pjmedia.com/columns/stacey…
2/by senior @JoeBiden campaign staffer (who deleted his tweet). I'm sure if I looked around some on left are upset with me for doing so and "surprised" as well.

Good. I don't advocate an ideological bent. I couldn't care less about whether someone is a Democrat or Republican.
3/Let's be clear, I am strongly against Trump. But that's bc he's horrible human being & authoritarian selfish leader who's destroying #RuleOfLaw & American democracy. That, however, has nothing to do w/he being @GOP or conservative, neither of which I truly believe he is anyway.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!