Leaving aside the implications for what we know about the spread of #COVID19, which we'll get to in a second, THIS, simply as a story about management of data, is astounding. At one of the most crucial points in the pandemic tens of thousands of positive cases were underreported.
We've known for some time there've been problems with #COVID19 data. There were serious problems collating data and turning it into national dashboards from early on. It was being done by hand in the early stages, we revealed in this investigation news.sky.com/story/amp/coro…
It seems those problems have not been laid to rest. Acc to @PHE_uk the explanation for what’s happened is “a technical issue… in the data load process that transfers #COVID19 positive lab results into reporting dashboards.” Thank God this was discovered within a few days...
BUT. This should NOT happen. We’re talking about thousands of tests being underreported ON SINGLE DAYS. Daily figures have looked v low in past few days. Did someone in PHE or Test & Trace really not do a sense check? Staggering this was going on for more than a week...
Much, much more worrying: this has a direct impact on test & trace.
15k people’s contacts won’t be traced.
In tracing every day counts.
That's a week or more in which #COVID19 was potentially allowed to spread in clusters.
Preventing that is the WHOLE POINT OF THIS SYSTEM.
At this stage it's perhaps worth remembering that test & trace is one of the most expensive investments ever made by a UK govt.
It already costs TWICE as much as the two aircraft carriers we spent a long time mulling whether we could afford.
Does this testing data shambles change our picture of how fast #COVID19 is spreading around the country?
Short answer: yes.
This chart shows you case growth as we were being told on Fri (black line).
The red line is what we now know.
Not good. And these are 7-day averages.
Regular readers will know I've been comparing the UK path with France & Spain, not because that's a "good" outcome but because this might give us a sense of where we may be heading.
Up until today we were v much in line with them.
Not any more.
But - and it's a big but - we are still nowhere near the kind of exponential doubling-every-seven-days growth @uksciencechief warned about a couple of weeks ago. Growth is steeper, yes. If it continues that's v bad.
But let's keep things in proportion.
This chart tells that story
Also remember the following: we've known for some time daily testing data is suspect.
Far more reliable is the @ONS survey & hospitalisations data.
Both of those series suggest #COVID19 spread has actually been slowing, not accelerating.
Tho early to draw too many conclusions
Finally, the charts were put together in haste so apols if there are any mistakes. It's late and I'm still getting my head round this.
Main tragedy seems to be those 15k cases that weren't properly traced.
Bigger picture: worse but not apocalyptic.
I'll do a deeper dive tomorrow.
Big thank you to @UKCovid19Stats who helped me track down some of the old testing data to compare Fri to Sun (hastily removed from gov.uk site, naturally).
One of many people out there doing good work in their spare time to help us all get our heads round this.
Addendum to this thread: one or two of you have correctly pointed out that while the UK line in that chart above comparing Spanish & French trajectories is by specimen date, the other lines aren't. Here's a chart with ALL trajectories by specimen date, as just shown on @SkyNews:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Jeepers the UK #COVID19 numbers are rising fast.
Another 14,542 cases over the past 24 hours.
We've been assured this is no longer the backlog effect following the data disaster.
And when you drill into the data we're now comfortably above 12k new cases a day *by test date*
Last week it looked v much from the data as if UK cases (at least as reported each day on the govt dashboard) were slowing. This week it's suddenly a v different picture. Compare the red and black lines. #COVID19 cases are rising fast. Doubling roughly every 10 days.
How does UK compare with France/Spain? Case growth now seems to be accelerating faster than it did there.
Chart 1 is #COVID19 positive tests BY TEST DATE.
I'm going to retire my old chart because it's totally distorted by the data dump. But wave goodbye to it in chart 2
How ON EARTH did the government manage to temporarily mislay 16,000 test results, putting thousands of people at risk of contracting #COVID19?
I try to explain it here.
Warning: you may find yourself shouting at the screen as you read it news.sky.com/story/coronavi…
A thread with some of the main details:
The key point (and perhaps the second most important revelation today) is that sitting at the very apex of Britain's testing system is a PHE computer system which processes test results and sends positive cases onto Test & Trace.
Now, this computer system works very well when it comes to the test result data coming in from the established pathology labs (pillar 1). There's a secure FTP link from them to something called SGSS. No problems there. But more testing these days is being done by "pillar 2"
Blimey: 12.872 new #COVID19 cases announced in the UK.
V big number. Biggest single daily number by a long distance.
Explanation is they left some cases out of the past week’s numbers down to “technical” reasons. 🤔
I’m pretty flabbergasted. Eight days - EIGHT DAYS - of #COVID19 case numbers were being under-reported due to “a technical issue which has now been resolved”.
And even tho it’s “resolved” no clarity abt how much of the shortfall is left to be reported. Hundreds? Thousands?
Does this change our picture of the disease?
Perhaps, perhaps not.
If today's figs contain the bulk of underreported cases the trajectory remains pretty similar, tho a bit higher.
But we don't know because once again they've been abysmally vague abt the extent of this. Astounding
Belatedly catching up with Test & Trace data from yday. Good news is on most metrics the performance of Pillar 2 tests (the private bit of the testing network) have improved from the previous week.
⬇️Time taken to get a test result
⬇️Distance travelled to get a test
That said, across the whole of pillar 2 in England the percentage of people getting test results within 24 hours of taking a test is still just 17% as of 17-23 Sep (eg last week). That's still a lot lower than earlier this summer as you can see from this chart:
Actually when it comes to test turnaround the one area where test processing/delivery seems to be slowing down is pillar 1, which is primarily hospital labs - the bit of the system that had held up best thus far
One problem with using #COVID19 trajectories to work out where we may be heading is question marks over the data - something illustrated brilliantly by this chart via @AlexSelbyB. Official case numbers look v v high now, but we weren't measuring cases v well back in spring.
Upshot is charts of cases alone are of limited use - and this is before you get to questions about whether the testing figs are reliable. We could look at positive tests as % of total (chart 2). It adjusts for fact we're doing more testing. But is that early data reliable?
The best measure of #COVID19 prevalence in England is prob the @ONS infection survey but again: it started after the peak. And right now what we REALLY need to gauge is not post peak but the run up to the peak
Pointy-headed thread: Do you remember this tweet of mine from earlier this year? About how extraordinary flows of gold out of the UK are completely changing the picture of UK trade? Well, brief update: it's still happening. Big time.
In the past few quarters, the UK trade account has swung into positive territory for the first time since the 1990s. And not just positive territory: the biggest trade surplus EVER. £16.9bn in Q2 alone...
It's worth emphasising that even if you look at the trade balance as a % of GDP it's still one of the highest levels we've ever seen. Only one other quarter - Q1 1981 - had a higher surplus. And I don't think it's ever swung quite as dramatically as this...