MASSIVE NEW PAPER: Last year, we released our policy vision that rejected the false dichotomy of “pro-market” and “pro-government."

We've transformed this into a concrete agenda, our blueprint for the "free-market welfare state" THREAD 1/
niskanencenter.org/faster_fairer/…
The focus of our efforts is not to provide a complete program to save America. In this agenda, we’re addressing the problem of restoring inclusive prosperity — revitalizing lagging economic dynamism while ensuring that the rewards of such dynamism are broadly shared. 2/
Even before #COVID19, America’s 21st-century malaise of dimming economic vitality and deepening social divisions demonstrated that something has gone wrong. Very wrong. Let’s do a little review. niskanencenter.org/what-the-pande…
From 2000 through 2018, growth in real GDP per capita — the best overall measure of economic output — averaged just a bit over 1% a year, down sharply from the 2% annual growth rate that persisted over the whole course of the 20th century. 4/
In 1970, over 90% of 30 year-olds were making more money than their parents. As of 2010, only 50% of 30 year-olds could still say the same (@therajchetty et al.) . 5/
There’s a huge divide in regional economic prosperity, w/ wealth concentrated in coastal cities, as @ModeledBehavior, @WillWilkinson and others have pointed out. 80% of U.S. counties have seen a decline in working-age population between 2007 and 2017. 6/ niskanencenter.org/the-density-di…
What went wrong to cause America’s descent into stagnation and inequality? It’s been a combination of social forces and bad public policy choices. 7/
In terms of social forces, labor force participation is down, educational attainment is down, and it’s just getting harder to generate good ideas. All of this affects productivity. 8/
As @hamandcheese and @Lindsey_brink note, “America’s liberal democratic capitalist welfare state has faltered in fulfilling its promise because times have changed. The task of delivering inclusive prosperity has grown much more difficult.” 9/
Then there are the policy failures of the past few decades, including the tax cuts, rollbacks on health and safety regulations...the regulatory capture, in which political insiders lobbied to benefit themselves at the expense of others...the misallocation of resources. 10/
What’s the solution? We firmly believe that the private sector functions at its best when it is organized around free markets... 11/
....in other words, markets that feature free entry, free exit, free trade across national boundaries, freedom to hire and re, freedom to take a job or quit, freedom to introduce new products or production methods without prior permission, and freedom to invest. 12/
BUT free markets don’t just pop up out of nowhere, nor are they self-sustaining (sorry libertarians). They require strong institutions - a strong public sector - to function effectively in the long term. It needs rules, social insurance, etc. to function at its best. 13/
Let’s borrow an idea from labor markets: “High-road” employers invest in their workforce, seeing each person as a long-term investment. “Low-road” employers minimize costs even if it means high turnover, but they provide opportunities that might otherwise not have existed. 14/
Both “high road” and “low-road approaches have their places in a diversified economy. But public policy must always take the high road. A capable govt. combined with a free market provides the conditions for people to choose their paths and flourish. 15/
We’re all too aware that noble intentions that expand government are not enough. 16/
No, big government by itself can lead to disaster and MORE inequality. We need a plan to avoid the pitfalls of regulatory capture and kludgeocracy (policy breakdown, bad execution, bureaucracy, etc). Steve Teles explains more in @NationalAffairs 17/ nationalaffairs.com/publications/d…
That’s where our agenda comes in. We tackle the most substantive shifts in procedure, as well as policy, redefining the “what” as well as the “how” of govt. 18/
Our 3 major goals:
✔️Revive the labor market by reforming monetary policy+social insurance
✔️Get rid of insider privilege created by regulatory capture
✔️Encourage economic dynamism through regulatory reform+public investment. 19/
Let’s take a quick look at our first goal (structural reform to the labor market) which definitely takes a high road approach to investing in people and being a buffer when they face risks….by upgrading the public sector. 20/
Many jobs and industries are likely to completely disappear due to the pandemic, as @jillianfward and @livrockeman report. Many job seekers will quit their job searches or have to undergo extensive retraining. 21/ bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
We argue that U.S. monetary policy has too often erred on the side of restrictiveness, resulting in millions of lost jobs. We propose a shift to level targeting in order to encourage job growth and economic dynamism in the coming years. 22/
We also need more modernized, more strategic ways to provide social insurance to workers. While the CARES Act provided aggressive cash assistance, the fact that it was a tax credit meant that many of the individuals who needed it most did not get it. 23/
The execution of the CARES Act also demonstrated the need to comprehensively modernize the ways of delivering social insurance to avoid glitches and fraud. It’s basic public infrastructure, like roads, and it’s high time for some maintenance. 24/
As @pmarca said, “A government that collects money from all its citizens and businesses each year has never built a system to distribute money to us when it’s needed most.” 25/ a16z.com/2020/04/18/its…
Other ways to protect and invest in the workforce via social insurance include employment security and workforce development measures, policies that empower working families (like the Child Allowance), and Universal Catastrophic Coverage. We explore these in detail. 26/
Now that we’ve looked at boosting the public sector, our next goal explores freeing up the PRIVATE sector by fighting ill-gotten gains at the top. We seek to restore U.S. capitalism to what it should be: dynamism that is both socioeconomically and geographically inclusive. 27/
We point out how the financial sector has been fueled by massive subsidies and how the unnatural ballooning of the financial sector has done a disservice to our economy and to taxpayers. 28/
We propose specific reforms in order to roll back the excesses of the intellectual property system...so that creators can still be rewarded for their ideas but also so that new innovators are not barred from the playing field.
29/
.@DanielTakash and @lindsey_brink have extensively documented the issues with and proposed solutions to IP policy. (more on this @capturedeconomy) 30/ niskanencenter.org/new-paper-why-…
We look at a number of issues that have driven prices so high in the medical field, from lobbying that pads physicians’ pockets to patenting issues that keep drug prices high, and outline specific supply-side reforms.
31/
And we examine the high cost of housing and conclude that the best way to advance the public interest across the board would be to reform #zoning so that new housing could be built in growing localities. #YIMBY 32/
The final section of our agenda outlines our plan for growing the economy, even as new ideas become harder to find. Rather than seeking to revitalize solutions that worked yesterday, we look forward into the new challenges and opportunities of the 21st century. 33/
Our solutions deal with specific, pro-growth proposals to decarbonize the economy, fueling growth via immigration, doubling down on research and development, reducing barriers to geographic and labor mobility, and more. 34/
There’s only so much detail you can get into on Twitter, so if you want more, you’re going to have to just read the paper itself. If you want to review last year’s policy vision, here it is. niskanencenter.org/the-center-can…
The rest is all here (all 100-something pages of it). Grab a big cup of coffee, read it, think about it, and give us your feedback! 36/36 niskanencenter.org/faster_fairer/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Niskanen Center

Niskanen Center Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NiskanenCenter

1 Oct
NEW PAPER and THREAD: “Defunding the police” does not enjoy broad public support in Black communities.

Most voters prefer reform (community groups, a larger social safety net, and limits on police violence) over abolishment. 1/ niskanencenter.org/reconstructing…
First, some history. It’s been common to portray African Americans as passive victims of policies. This downplays the intentionality and purpose behind Black leaders’ long struggle for public safety in their communities in the ‘80s and ‘90s. 2/
Here’s a chart of the crime wave, which rose in the ‘60s and ‘70s, stalled in the ‘80s, and peaked again in 1991 before declining. The black community was hit hard, and calls for more policing and more punitive justice were bipartisan and crossed racial lines. 3/
Read 25 tweets
24 Sep
THREAD: A @CIS_org report claims that refugees cost the govt more than they contribute. But the report inflates costs and reaches overconfident conclusions.

Left plot: CIS estimates. Right plot: w/ descendant effects and w/o educational downgrading niskanencenter.org/the-weak-case-…
.@CIS_org's method of calculating avg refugee cost: 1) start with estimates of the lifetime fiscal impact of immigrants by age+edu from @theNASEM report 2) add costs for refugee resettlement/welfare, 3) apply estimates to refugees based on their age+education in the 2016 (ASR).
The ASR includes a question on educational attainment, but rather than rely on refugees' responses, CIS report opts to subject their answers to arbitrary cutoffs based on the ASR's years of schooling question, effectively downgrading educational attainment.
Read 12 tweets
24 Sep
STARTING NOW: Hear from @Blitterman, @RepRooney, Matt Sonnesyn, @CFTCbehnam, and @khilldavis as they discuss implications of climate change risk to the U.S. financial system.

We'll also be live-tweeting the event in this thread. us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
"From a political and from a 'what's right' point of view, climate change is a central issue. Republicans have left the discussion entirely, but Florida is ground zero. People are starting to realize that." - @RepRooney Image
.@Blitterman: "Climate is a risk management problem. And when you look at it from that perspective, a lot of things become very clear. For one, we don't have the right incentives...the first recommendation of this report is that the U.S. has to price carbon." Image
Read 10 tweets
22 Sep
THREAD: For the first time since the passage of the 1980 Refugee Act, the U.S. is no longer the world’s leader in refugee resettlement.

A NEW PAPER by @IdeanSalehyan and Larry Yungk lays out 5 measures we must take if we are to save this program. 1/ niskanencenter.org/restoring-the-…
Historically, there has been broad, bipartisan support for the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP).

The Trump administration has politicized the idea of refugee assistance and has slashed refugee admissions across the board. 2/ niskanencenter.org/how-trump-poli…
In 2017, the number of refugees admitted to the U.S. was less than half of the 100,000 proposed by President Obama. The Trump administration has repeatedly slashed the ceiling on refugee admissions — with fiscal year 2020’s proposal standing at 18,000. 3/ Image
Read 16 tweets
16 Sep
.@RachelBitecofer has been saying for over a year that there's a blue wave coming. The shocks of the pandemic, economic collapse, etc. haven't really changed things.

The issues aren't deciding this election. Party affiliation is.
If you're looking at the @FiveThirtyEight aggregator, you might see an expanded advantage for Biden pre and post pandemic. But that only goes back to March 2020.
But the Real Clear Politics aggregator, which stretches back well into 2019, shows that Biden has merely recovered the level of support he had prior to the Democratic primary- a period where the Dems had to endure a brutal public intra-party fight while the GOP was inert.
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep
New from @jtlevy: It's easy to conflate openness to different ideas and "free speech" with bestowing prestige on the powerful, even if they have used that power for evil.

There's a difference. It's time to set some standards.

<Thread> 1/
niskanencenter.org/honoring-the-d…
Take universities: Professors should be allowed to lecture as they see fit, students should be allowed to defend their viewpoints, and campus organizations should be able to invite speakers of their choice....even if the arguments are in favor of odious ideas or policies. 2/
But those who used their power to stymy human rights, those who lied throughout their careers, those who undermined democracy...the list goes on...should not be HONORED for they did. Nor should they receive recognition simply because they held power. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!