One of the most important things Congress could do when legislating new antitrust laws is to statutorily enshrine—and expand—the essential facilities doctrine.
It was judicially created to constrain monopolies, but has fallen out of favor as the right wing took over our courts.
Another key principle in strengthening antitrust enforcement of tech companies is recognizing—in the legal code, since courts have declined to acknowledge—that harms to consumers can include eroding privacy protections or service standards, not just price inflation.
Beyond tech, antitrust laws could also be expanded by rescinding the statutory exemptions long enjoyed by sports leagues that have prolifically suppressed the speech of their workers/players.
Antitrust exemptions are public subsidies that the leagues do not deserve.
Another way tech companies have abused users—and the Internet—is by acquiring their competitors to prevent competition.
Mergers & acquisitions require much greater scrutiny, and public participation in potential settlements. Regulators allow too many problematic mergers.
Mandating interoperability could also empower Internet users and put big tech firms in their place.
This is one shape that the essential facilities doctrine could take if statutorily enshrined and forced into the courts.
I grew up in rural Missouri, as part of the only immigrant family within 11 miles in any direction—but the worst racism I’ve ever encountered was in 2020, right here in the proud progressive bastion of San Francisco. Thread. /1
The institutional racism & Islamophobia that our campaign has encountered from the San Francisco press—and even self-described progressives and socialists—has been alarming to me. Sadly, it has longstanding roots. /2
Racism emerges whenever decision-making bodies ignore facts to condemn people of color when falsely accused. The same dynamic pervades the criminal justice system. /3
By what do *you* expect to grow outraged this evening?
(FWIW we send our best to @KamalaHarris and—despite our differences—hope that she hands Pence his behind on a plate)
Kamala comes out swinging, forcefully laying out the profound costs our country has endured during this pandemic due to the reckless negligence of the Trump administration.
She correctly notes the president’s continuing failures, and commits to making a vaccine free for all.
A former acquaintance recently provided a statement on Twitter regarding sexual harassment.
These claims are false.
Every survivor must be heard, and I hope to be allowed the same opportunity to be heard as well. /1
Sexual harassment is despicable. Those who exploit structural sexism and power imbalances must be exposed.
I am committed to putting survivors’ interests first, before my own. /2
These claims have been amplified by former staff who have conflated our campaign’s attempts to manage concerns with their performance with gender-based discrimination. /3
My policy agenda starts with limiting institutional power wherever it emerges—whether in a government agency or a corporate industry—to defend the rights of individuals & communities.
We've explained many times how my concerns include tech companies. Thread. /1
Palantir is among the worst corporate citizens of Silicon Valley. The company's business model is inextricably intertwined with intelligence agencies, and profits from the fraud & corruption that I aim to end once I reach Congress.
#NotMeUs reflects our constitutional principle of popular sovereignty.
Candidates don’t win or lose elections.
*Volunteers and movements* win or lose elections, with candidates serving as sails through which supporters combine energy.
That also has further implications. /2
I come to running for office after 20 years of leading non-profits & advocacy campaigns, taking action in the courts, briefing Congress, organizing artists, producing art, putting my body on the line, and training others.
Elections are part—but not all—of the #NotMeUs puzzle. /3
Today, @buzzfeed noted that some anti-surveillance advocates would consider embracing invasive measures imposed to protect public health. buzzfeednews.com/article/rosieg…
Here’s how to keep those measures from becoming yet another executive power grab. Thread. /1
First, several provisions of the odious & unconstitutional Patriot Act have expired as scheduled, and the sky has not fallen in.
Policymakers—including Nancy Pelosi—who have repeatedly clamored for extensions should be ashamed. commondreams.org/views/2018/01/… /2
Unfortunately, we can’t trust the Trump admin to abide by legal restrictions.
Before drawing criticism for insider trading, @SenatorBurr recently claimed that Trump wields inherent executive authority to conduct any surveillance program under EO 12333. /3