By what do *you* expect to grow outraged this evening?
(FWIW we send our best to @KamalaHarris and—despite our differences—hope that she hands Pence his behind on a plate)
Kamala comes out swinging, forcefully laying out the profound costs our country has endured during this pandemic due to the reckless negligence of the Trump administration.
She correctly notes the president’s continuing failures, and commits to making a vaccine free for all.
Pence thankfully repudiates the president’s hysteria by showing an entirely different, more dignified, demeanor.
This may be what Pelosi speaks of “yearning for” among Republicans, but don’t be fooled: Pence remains as committed to predatory policies as Trump himself.
Pence trying to spin the administration’s failures on pandemic response is pathetic, and Kamala shows a stark contrast.
She’s speaking as a voice of an appropriately outraged people, and embodying the role quite adeptly.
While the VP nominees are trading polished rhetorical barbs, there’s another layer on which the debate is unfolding, as each of them aim to demonstrate a combination of strength and warmth to voters.
Their demeanor—and how they’re perceived—may well matter more than their words.
Kamala notes her qualifications and storied career, noting that she serves on the Senate Intel Committee.
What is it with San Francisco politicians and the intelligence committees? Feinstein chaired that committee, and Pelosi was once the ranking member on its House counterpart.
Kamala aims for the jugular, invoking the issue that should have been at the center of the impeachment process: the president’s well-documented corruption and self-enrichment at public expense.
Kamala nods to the generational consensus on socialized education, but stops short after community colleges, endorsing means testing for higher education and a relatively meaningless $10k benefit for student debt holders who frankly deserve better.
Pence lies through his teeth when claiming a commitment to protecting coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Meanwhile, Kamala speaks directly to people with chronic conditions and their families: “They’re coming for you.”
Pence claims the Green New Deal (which Biden does not support) would “crush” jobs and the economy.
You know what will crush the economy?
How about entire states burning, or being inundated by multiple hurricanes at once?
Pence buries his head in the sand.
Harris is rhetorically breaking to the left, speaking to the challenges confronting working families, and the “failure of leadership” under this administration.
It’s a welcome change from last week, when Biden ran very much to the right in his debate against Trump.
BTW it was McCain’s congressional committee that hosted the hearing after which I was arrested in 2015 asking questions raised by the Snowden revelations.
Pence trying to claim moral superiority on SCOTUS nominations—his indignation at suggestions to pack the Court if Barrett is confirmed—is audacious.
It’s like a thief‘s outrage at finding a door locked.
I grew up in rural Missouri, as part of the only immigrant family within 11 miles in any direction—but the worst racism I’ve ever encountered was in 2020, right here in the proud progressive bastion of San Francisco. Thread. /1
The institutional racism & Islamophobia that our campaign has encountered from the San Francisco press—and even self-described progressives and socialists—has been alarming to me. Sadly, it has longstanding roots. /2
Racism emerges whenever decision-making bodies ignore facts to condemn people of color when falsely accused. The same dynamic pervades the criminal justice system. /3
One of the most important things Congress could do when legislating new antitrust laws is to statutorily enshrine—and expand—the essential facilities doctrine.
It was judicially created to constrain monopolies, but has fallen out of favor as the right wing took over our courts.
Another key principle in strengthening antitrust enforcement of tech companies is recognizing—in the legal code, since courts have declined to acknowledge—that harms to consumers can include eroding privacy protections or service standards, not just price inflation.
A former acquaintance recently provided a statement on Twitter regarding sexual harassment.
These claims are false.
Every survivor must be heard, and I hope to be allowed the same opportunity to be heard as well. /1
Sexual harassment is despicable. Those who exploit structural sexism and power imbalances must be exposed.
I am committed to putting survivors’ interests first, before my own. /2
These claims have been amplified by former staff who have conflated our campaign’s attempts to manage concerns with their performance with gender-based discrimination. /3
My policy agenda starts with limiting institutional power wherever it emerges—whether in a government agency or a corporate industry—to defend the rights of individuals & communities.
We've explained many times how my concerns include tech companies. Thread. /1
Palantir is among the worst corporate citizens of Silicon Valley. The company's business model is inextricably intertwined with intelligence agencies, and profits from the fraud & corruption that I aim to end once I reach Congress.
#NotMeUs reflects our constitutional principle of popular sovereignty.
Candidates don’t win or lose elections.
*Volunteers and movements* win or lose elections, with candidates serving as sails through which supporters combine energy.
That also has further implications. /2
I come to running for office after 20 years of leading non-profits & advocacy campaigns, taking action in the courts, briefing Congress, organizing artists, producing art, putting my body on the line, and training others.
Elections are part—but not all—of the #NotMeUs puzzle. /3
Today, @buzzfeed noted that some anti-surveillance advocates would consider embracing invasive measures imposed to protect public health. buzzfeednews.com/article/rosieg…
Here’s how to keep those measures from becoming yet another executive power grab. Thread. /1
First, several provisions of the odious & unconstitutional Patriot Act have expired as scheduled, and the sky has not fallen in.
Policymakers—including Nancy Pelosi—who have repeatedly clamored for extensions should be ashamed. commondreams.org/views/2018/01/… /2
Unfortunately, we can’t trust the Trump admin to abide by legal restrictions.
Before drawing criticism for insider trading, @SenatorBurr recently claimed that Trump wields inherent executive authority to conduct any surveillance program under EO 12333. /3