It’s hard to believe that we first learned of Trump’s Covid diagnosis exactly one week ago tinyurl.com/yxq2vbv3. Here are a bunch of hot takes on today’s issues, which continue to move at hyper-speed.
2/ On Trump’s clinical status. Yesterday, his doc reported that Trump's vital signs were stable, including normal oxygen saturation w/o supplemental O2. Today’s videos show no obvious shortness of breath (he completes sentences without stopping for air): tinyurl.com/y3p9l8lh
3) Based on his @FoxBusiness phone-in today tinyurl.com/y5h5brpe, his mental status & judgment seem to be at his baseline (that's the standard we use). Whatever you think about Trump's mind, there’s no new evidence of lack of capacity to do his job based on Covid or meds.
4/ Again, per his doctor’s note yesterday tinyurl.com/y43v9tuu, Trump's fever is gone, which could be true improvement or masking of fever by steroids or antipyretics.
But overall, Trump seems stable. With each day, his odds of survival improve.
5/ As of last Friday, as a high-risk Covid patient w/ high fever and low oxygen who needed hospitalization, he probably had a 1-in-5 chance of dying from this episode. There's no great data to give a precise estimate now, but given stability on day 7, mortality rate is probably…
6/ … now more like 1-in-20.
Note that it is decidedly not zero – many Covid patients (most famously Herman Cain tinyurl.com/yxco3acb) were stable after week 1 and went on to crash in week 2 or 3. Of course, it’s hard to extrapolate from…
7/ … the literature, given that Trump enjoys around-the-clock care in his home, can return to the hospital by helicopter, and has received 3 medications, one of which (monoclonal antibodies) is not available to other patients, outside of a clinical trial.
8/ But the odds – that he will avoid re-hospitalization, the ICU, intubation, and death – are now favorable. His symptom course is harder to predict, partly because we really don’t know what his current symptoms are and partly because…
9/ … his symptoms may be masked by steroids, which will be stopped in a few days (usual course is 10 days; the remdesivir was probably stopped Tuesday after day 5; the monoclonals were a single shot last week). But here too, if he remains asymptomatic…
10/ …through the first 10-14 days, he’s likely to have a fairly benign course overall. Moreover, it’s unlikely, though not impossible, that he’ll have serious symptoms later (ie, be a long-hauler).
On the other hand, whether he'll have long-term heart and lung involvement…
11/ is hard to predict – unfortunately, many patients do, even if they had a mild initial course. For example, this study found MRI evidence of heart inflammation in 60%; it didn't vary by initial severity tinyurl.com/y6plsg97. The clinical meaning of this is not yet known.
12/ We also learned Trump tested positive for antibodies yesterday. That’s likely from the monoclonal antibodies he received tinyurl.com/y59kkjq5; had he not gotten them, it would be early to test + for antibodies (it usually takes 10-14 days). Overall, it doesn’t mean much.
13/ There is no way to prove whether the monoclonal antibodies (actually called REGN-COV2, though Trump calls them “Regeneron,” which is the name of the company) contributed to his benign course so far, though they may have.
14/ He calls it a “miracle cure.” This, of course, illustrates his (mis)understanding of science. Previous Trumpian “miracles,” you’ll recall, included hydroxychloroquine (proven ineffective), convalescent plasma (jury is out), bleach ( ), & the virus itself, just going away.
15/ When he received the antibodies (it’s not clear whether he was hypoxic yet), he probably had an 85-90% chance of surviving this episode, independent of that experimental treatment. This is why we do randomized trials, with active drug in one arm of the study...
16/ … and placebo or “usual care" in the other. If he continues to do well, it could be due to the antibodies, or to the other 2 meds (remdesivir or dexamethasone), or some combo of them, or luck. There’s simply no good way to known when looking at a single patient’s course.
17/ It follows, then, that the President’s course should have precisely zero influence on public policy, including the cost of the drug or its @US_FDA approval prospects. But that’s not the way Trump thinks, nor, in turn, the stock market. tinyurl.com/y3c5w3gy
18/ Turning to next week's debate: the Commission on Presidential Debates announced today it intends to hold the second debate, scheduled for next Thursday, virtually. Trump immediately rejected the decision tinyurl.com/y34jkbjs
19/ The Commission's decision is wise. Knowing when a Covid patient is no longer contagious is tricky: the @CDCgov guideline says it's 10 days after symptoms began, but 20 days for patients with severe symptoms or compromised immunity tinyurl.com/y3e3t3az
20/ Trump’s symptoms began last Thursday, we believe. So next Thursday would be ~14 days. Although he doesn’t have a known immunity problem, he’s now on an immunosuppressant, dexamethasone.
Unfortunately, there is no available test to allow for 100% certainty re: infectivity.
21/ The problem w/ testing is that a negative test can be wrong (so can a positive – late in the illness it can represent dead virus). For a high risk person (Biden, age 77, is) to stand mask-less, 12 ft away from a mask-less patient with recent Covid who is talking loudly…
22/ … for 90 minutes when said patient has even a 1% chance of still being contagious would be far too risky. If I were advising Biden, I would tell him that the right call is to hold the debate virtually, or not at all.
23/ When I first heard of Trump’s diagnosis, I hoped this would serve as a teachable moment for the US – one that might advance the science & change public attitudes in a way that could save many lives tinyurl.com/yynz7mlc. But as @murphymike says, Trump is the "atomic clock":
24/ totally predictable & unchanging. By minimizing the role of health measures (incl masking & contact tracing), downplaying the virus's severity because he (may) be getting lucky, touting unproven therapies & framing himself as a survivor due to his own powers of personality...
25/ (implying that those who died lacked such fortitude; read: losers), he continues his record of Covid-19 failure. The hope that illness would lead to humility & compassion for millions of sickened & 210,000 dead Americans was to ask too much. Now I simply wish him good health.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just watched the @TuckerCarlson segment with Trump interview by @DrMarcSiegel. Takeaway: Trump looks good, his voice is strong, no visible shortness of breath, he's finishing sentences without stopping for air. Mental status and judgment seem unchanged from his usual. (1/9)
Siegel actually did a decent interview – asking questions testing recall, along with others that got at judgment and insight (latter included asking about lessons learned from this experience). I'm not a Trump fan but it's hard to make 25th Amendment case from what we saw. (2/9)
And, while Trump is still not completely out of the woods – there's still a small (<5%) chance of a significant setback – with a patient this stable 8 days into the illness, his most likely course is a relatively uneventful recovery. (3/9)
a) Conley's mea culpa: “I was trying to reflect the upbeat attitude of the team. Didn’t want to give any information that would steer the course of his illness.” Trump's fingerprints.
But even so, today was only slightly better. (1/8)
b/ Biggest news is that T had 2 episodes of hypoxia (down to 93-94% O2 saturation), & Conley evaded whether sat was ever <90. "Never in low 80s" is all he offered.
c/ Re: Chest CT: "There were some expected findings but nothing of concern." What the hell does that mean?...(2/8)
...To be clear, the "expected findings" on a chest CT is NORMAL. If it was normal, he should say that. Anything else should have been described.
(The only semi-benign interpretation would be if the prez has a known chronic finding – like a benign nodule – that was seen)...(3/8)
I’ve not yet seen report on whether Trump has received dexamethasone (steroids); we know he already got remdesivir (antiviral) & “cocktail” of monoclonal antibodies.
But steroids, the only drugs proven to lower Covid mortality, raise a complex set of issues. An explainer. 1/9
The key is the dynamics of the immune system in Covid: early on, damage is being done by the virus itself, so rapid treatment w/ an antiviral & other efforts to bolster the immune response make perfect sense (although “making sense” & “proven to work” are 2 different things). 2/9
But steroids act differently – they suppress the immune system. Why could that work? Because later in Covid, some of the harm is by damage caused by our own immune systems going haywire – attacking our bodies in a frenzied effort to kill the intruder tinyurl.com/yyra4qnd 3/9
OK, now this is now officially mind-blowing. Of course, today’s thread will be all about the President’s illness, what might come next, and what it means.
2/ Once Hope Hicks tested positive, the thinking was that she might have given it to Trump on flights Tues (to OH for debate) or Wed (rally in MN) tinyurl.com/y4e5sgmf But that theory was kiboshed yesterday: the >3 day incubation period meant the exposure was likely earlier.
3/ The perfect timing would have been last weekend. Perhaps a big event where people were mask-less, not distanced, with backslaps and hugging.
Like the Saturday nomination ceremony at the White House for #AmyConeyBarrett.
As a politics junkie, I spend much of each day refreshing the election projections @538politics (tinyurl.com/y4vqs85a; it currently has Biden at a 78% chance of victory).
2/ While @NateSilver538’s model has many variables, I’m guessing it’s missing one of the most important: Covid status in swing states. That’s today’s topic.
I’ll focus on the 8 states that 538 deems the most likely to be tipping points: PA, FL, WI, MI, AZ, NC, OH, and NV.
3/ My thesis: in a close race, whether Covid is front of mind may determine whether persuadable voters base their votes on Trump’s handling of Covid, or on other things.
The fact that the US is likely now starting its 3rd surge (whether in your state or not) should be enough…
Wonderful @UCSF medicine grand rounds today, focused on San Francisco’s remarkable Covid response. It’s here: tinyurl.com/y3uhy6tz.
As I said on Monday, if U.S. had had SF’s Covid mortality rate, we'd be at 36,101 deaths, not 200,000.
2/ San Francisco continue to do quite well, even as U.S. (particularly Midwest; a bit in South & West, Fig on L) begins to surge. @UCSFHospitals, only 15 Covid pts, 5 on vents (Fig R). Test positivity 3.3% in pts w/ symptoms, 0.53% in those without – both lowest # 's since June.
3/ San Francisco: still under 100 (99) deaths since the start; remarkable. 64 cases/day (Fig on L). Hospitalizations also at 64 – both numbers not as good as they were in March-June but about half of the July peak (Fig L).) Test positivity rate: 2.1%, the lowest % since June.