We need to pull out of this tailspin of the self-fulfilling prophecy of political violence during and after the election before it is too late.

We can start by understanding what “sow discord” really means.

My new piece for @SURfdn #defusingdisinfo /1

The motivations for trumpism are hard to pin down—fleeting, hyper-individualized, sometimes sounding as much far-left as far-right

A rejection of all systems, the embrace of the view that the center cannot hold, so why not accelerate the fragmentation, or at least not stop it /2
There’s this idea of the coming need to defend some core set of beliefs by force.

Fight who? The answer isn’t clear. Whoever. Other Americans.

But why? For what? Not to build something, win something. Just to defend what you have through a time of inevitable unraveling. /3
Now, we have the arrest of 13 “militia” members in Michigan — a group that aimed to kidnap (and probably execute) the Governor of Michigan, then probably kill law enforcement and civilians, to overthrow the government and move toward “civil war” /4

The most serious domestic terror plot in the past decade. It weaves together anti-lockdown/“anti-tyranny”/“pro-liberty” themes, anti-establishment/“sovereign” themes, and more traditional anarchist/“all government is tyranny” content, with some added anti-wealth narrative. /5
It defies neat left/right distinctions. It’s a snapshot of the online ideological chaos that is accelerating across social media, accelerating the decay of our democracy.

A decay inflamed by the President of the United States and his calls to action against whatever windmill. /6
But it gets at something worth highlighting — the term “sow discord.”

Since we began analyzing the Russian information campaigns in 2016, this has become common usage: “The Kremlin sought to sow discord in American society.”

But what does this mean really? /7
If you are the Kremlin, “to sow discord” means to escalate the potential for unrest and conflict within a society or population — what is sometimes referred to as the “protest potential” of a population in doctrine. /8
The most efficient way to elevate this potential is to manipulate or drive a conflict from both (or all) sides — “to create a permanently operating front through the entire territory of the enemy state.”

You want to push the conflict — in some cases, any conflict. /9
That heightened perception of turmoil and internal strife corrodes the resilience of a target nation, distracts from real threats, and increases the potential that individuals and groups can be manipulated by malign influence campaigns into achieving the goals of the enemy /10
We lose sight of the fact that Russia was indeed targeting “both sides.”

The Kremlin’s information campaigns also target the left, especially supporters of Sander and Stein, anti-police/racial justice themes, and environmental issues. /11
I’ve written about the importance of the Jade Helm 2015 conspiracy as a test of Kremlin information campaigns targeting right-wing Americans — but there were also trials that targeted the anti-pipeline protests, which were a more left-wing focus /12

One of the most frequently used examples of Russia’s activities is the time they organized both sides of a protest to confront each other. /13

US intelligence assessed that the Kremlin preferred a Trump victory and was denigrating Clinton. So why be on both sides of an issue?

1) because even when you have a preference, you prepare for any eventuality, create options /14
2) because the strife and division is deeper if you grab both sides of the spectrum and pull

3) because the Kremlin’s goal in 2016 was to weaken us and move us back from the world and our allies.

And how inward-looking we have become, really? Yeah. Exactly. /15
“Sowing discord” is not something used only by foreign actors. Political disruptors close to the president — like Steve Bannon — also understand that stoking more than one side of an issue can yield maximum division in a way that is advantageous. /16
So what does it have to do with the Michigan terror plot?

Because we are all — all of us, no matter what our political leanings — becoming too wrapped in a potentially self-fulfilling narrative of the inevitability of violence in this election cycle. /17
Left & right alike inflate/worry about “civil war.”

Trump and his campaign drive this with rhetoric like “the army of Trump” — his illegal poll watchers who may disrupt voting on Election Day.

And remember QAnon’s “digital soldiers.”

The militarization isn’t an accident /18
It seems insane that we are talking about armed insurgency in America.

And I’m not saying that clear-eyed threat assessments aren’t necessary, or that the tensions in American society aren’t real, or that there isn’t the potential for (likely small pockets) of unrest /19
Our descent into chaos is not a given. We need to stop inflating its potential in how we discuss it.

In Michigan, the institutions did their job.

Malign actors — foreign and domestic — want to pull us to the extremes, have us scream about the coming civil war. So, don’t. /20
We are not powerless in the current era. This is a myth conjured in terrifying detail by the viral bogeyman in the White House /21

The threat and fear of violence distracts from the more significant potential challenges /22
We aren’t going to wake up in The Walking Dead on Nov 4

No, the real nightmare is we’re still going to live in a fractured America barreling into a future imperfectly governed by imperfect laws, thirsty for leadership that addresses the biting uncertainties of regular people /23
Stop and ask: fight who?
You won’t like the answer when you pick it apart.

We all need to dial back the rhetoric of conflict, or the real adversaries — foreign or domestic — of what America is and has to be will win — and really, f*ck them, they don’t deserve victory /24
Don’t participate in the echo chamber of the inevitability of American descent into violence and despair.

We are not powerless actors. Our institutions matter. We matter.

Echo the America you love, not the America you fear. Don’t mirror the discord. /25

PS: the thing far more likely to crush us on Election Day is a flood of disinformation.

Prepare for this far more immediate threat.

Helpful info from @justinhendrix

PPS from my dad: “Remind everyone we have no choice! No one else will take us now!”


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Molly McKew

Molly McKew Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MollyMcKew

11 Oct
Look. Here’s how you do this:

“The Republican Party is rushing to establish a Supreme Court whose base views will be wildly out of alignment with the views of American voters on key issues by overriding the opinions of those voters to get it done before the election...
... This is the next step in a decades-long strategy by the GOP to control, manipulate, and subvert institutions and processes that will give them disproportionate influence to their percentage of support in America. We know this can’t be how our democracy works...
...I won’t apologize for defending the idea that the vote of every American should count a much as the vote of every other American. There are a lot of things we need to do to ensure this ideal. In the coming decades, we will face unparalleled, accelerated change ...
Read 4 tweets
9 Oct
I’m really stuck on this thing where FoxNews refused to cover the most significant story of the day—the most significant domestic terrorism plot *in years*—in prime time because it doesn’t fit the editorial narrative they are using to mindf*ck Americans toward political violence
It’s unconscionable what they are KNOWINGLY DOING to America by manipulating perceptions of reality.
I’m going outside to write, but in case you were wondering, so far this AM Fox & Friends have leaned heavy on hurricane coverage & “court packing” to avoid the Michigan story, with segments on one homeowner in Wisconsin “confronting” (non-white) protesters, and a cookbook. Really
Read 7 tweets
9 Oct
I’m forcing myself to watch Fox News.

Tucker says Kamala & Joe only pretend to be people of faith and that Kamala “barks.” Keepin’ it classy!

Huge video montage to explain Pence isn’t sexist.

Zero words so far about domestic terror plot against Gov Whitmer.
Tucker thinks this is about “unhappy rich ladies whining about oppression” which is somehow about “identity politics”

Oh Jesus, he has Victor Davis Hanson madlibbing trigger words — AOC fracking Obama elites bankers green new deal — cannot. toggling to another channel.
Honest to god he is living angry far right word magnet art. It’s impossible to stop watching.

He says the working man is dying for “the zoom and the Skype class” and Trump is standing up to them by fracking and freeing Americans from wars started by Bay Area elites.

Read 37 tweets
8 Oct
Ok I’m disappointed the set doesn’t *actually* look like Tron, but I’ll get over it. Probably.

Another missed opportunity of 2020.

My VP Debate thread, such as it is, will commence below: /1
The bar is so low for Pence tonight, if his head doesn’t spin around like the exorcist, or he doesn’t collapse in covid-fever mid-debate, he’ll have passed (in very pass/fail sense) /2
Pence’s make-up is a fail; looks like mildly warmed death. Kamala, flawless.

Kamala writes down TUMULTUOUS on her pad.
Read 20 tweets
30 Sep
I am deeply, deeply worried about POTUS referencing the “Proud Boys” unprompted in the debate in the manner that he did. He is clearly waaaaaaaay more involved in the day to day management of relations with/winks toward extremist groups than he has thus far allowed to be exposed.
Read 5 tweets
29 Sep
Tonight is the 1st presidential debate. Likely there will be a lot of mis/disinformation + conspiracies thrown around.

How can you fight malign narrative & improve online discourse on social media during the debate?

Read my #defusingdisinfo latest: /1 standuprepublic.com/debate-night-p…
1- Don’t elevate false or misleading information or conspiracies from POTUS by reposting them in outrage.

When you post/reply/engage sub content, it amplifies them in algorithms/trends & helps them reach more people. It also pressures traditional media to cover these claims. /2
You should consider not engaging or posting them at all. Deprive toxic claims of the attention economy. Just leave it alone.

But, if you want to push back on toxic information, here are some ideas how to do it better: /3
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!