I find the Swiss data the most convincing. German, French, and Italian rates are in the exact order that you would expect
The difference between German and Italian rates *within* Switzerland are a factor of 10, similar to the difference between Germany and the US, @ScottAdamsSays. That is much more of a mystery than comparing two separate countries!
This makes sense, since small differences between cultures are amplified *exponentially*
This can be generalized. *Any* difference between regions, whether it's culture, age structure, weather, etc. will be amplified exponentially. Even random things. So it is not at all surprising that their are many unexplained weirdnesses in the the data!
This is the podcast on Covid self-tests that you have to hear. It answers all your questions. Takeaway: It's the bureaucracy, stupid! Only 21 minutes, and Gladwell is an excellent interviewer. My notes are below
Mina: It's been first and foremost a regulatory hurdle
The only paths we have to evaluate tests like this in the US are medical diagnostic pathways. They're pathways designed specifically to ensure that a physician, like a detective, is getting all of the information they need to diagnose a sick person in front of them
Right now you can get a CLIA waver (and rapid tests have *not* gotten wavers yet) but even if you *do* get a waver you can't sell to anyone, but only to "trained and designated" people!
1. To head off future pandemics, we should divide the world into quarantine regions, now. These can be likened to the compartments of a submarine. People understand that in case of a leak, you can close off one compartment and save the whole ship
2. Similarly, we can close down a quarantine region, and save the rest of the world. Or a quarantine region can close itself down, and save itself *from* the world
3. For small countries, the quarantine region can be the whole country. But larger countries should have sub-regions. In the United States, quarantine regions should be states, though small states can combine into a single region, and large states should be subdivided
I read Pinker's letter of defense (linked) and was disgusted. Not because he did a favor for a friend, and not because contributed to Epstein's defense, but because he now regrets it
An ethical person does not regret telling the truth in a court of law, even when a bad person benefits from it. This is so important that it's one of the Ten Commandments
And a good person does not regret doing a favor for a friend, when the favor does not violate any ethical boundaries, or have any bad results (the result, here, is being an honest witness in court)
I think this is the problem that I'm having with @nntaleb's views on intelligence: IQ is well-defined, it's how well you do on an IQ test. But I haven't seen Nassim's definition of intelligence
In The Black Swan, @nntaleb carefully defines Mediocristan and Extremistan. So when he goes to war against Gauss, it's clear that he means that we shouldn't apply the metrics of Mediocristan to Extremistan
So, I know what IQ is, but I don't know what this other thing is, that @nntaleb is going to war against. In earlier tweets, I tried to make sense of Nassim by understanding that IQ is not a good measure of ability to avoid risk. This agrees with my intuition