The Court is expected to take up the matter for hearing shortly.
The Bench has assembled for the post-lunch session.
Hearing begins.
Senior Counsel Harish Salve for IBA suggests that the Court takes up the hearing on a day when the Bench can hear the matter for the whole day, points out that that Centre and RBI have filed their additional affidavits and detailed arguments may be required to be made
Senior Counsel P Chidambaram for one of the petitioners, Shopping Centres Association of India, submits that his petition concerns the issues that have been touched upon by Centre and RBI and he may be heard also.
Senior Counsel Rajiv Dutta for the petitioner in the lead case: The banks are already capitalising on the existing loans with compound interest. That should stop.
Salve: Nothing can be stopped like this. We (Banks) will have to be heard.
Dutta: We (individual borrowers) are small people, we are not covered under Kamath Committee report etc. This charging of compounded interest must stop
(SC points out that the Court has already passed order not to declare loan accounts as NPAs and compound interest on small loans has been waived by the Centre)
SG Tushar Mehta for Centre seeks to make arguments, highlights what the original point of contention was in the litigation.
SC asks how long is the government expected to implement the assurances made in terms of compound interest waiver.
SC asks Salve about what is being done from the Banks' end in terms of waiver of compounded interest.
Salve: At present, whatever the government has said about interest on interest is happening. It will have to be done and it will be worked out.
Mehta: My difficulty is every time when the bench takes up the matter, whatever comes to the mind of litigant is being projected and we are expected to give answers.
SC: We are only asking if the waiver of compounded interest is percolating to benefit the borrowers
(SG reads from the affidavit filed by the Centre)
Mehta: There are already discussions and contemplations taking place.
Salve: The RBI has to issue a circular for this because we (banks) cannot do it without a circular of the RBI.
Salve: We are saying it will be done. Centre has assured, it will be done.
SC: We are only asking when will it be done.
Mehta: Governement has given the assurance on affidavit and have already said that decision is taken but only modalities have to be worked out.
Mehta: It is only for these modalities that time till Nov 15 is sought.
Justice Bhushan: Our only observation is that if decision is taken to waive the compounded interest, then one month period may not be required for implementing this decision.
Mehta: This observation nay be a little harsh.
Justice Shah: This is a welcome a decision, but the small borrowers want to see some results. Consider the plight of the common man.
Mehta: We don't stand to gain anything in delaying it but how it operates is the banks will waive the interest in interest and thereafter they will have to get reimbursement from the government.
Mehta: There are eight categories identified and computation will be done based on interest component of each of those accounts.
Chidambaram suggests that the Court wishes to send out a message to the common man.
Mehta takes objection to it, says the message has already been sent and centre has taken the decision in this regard.
SC assures that the Court welcomes the decision of the Centre but only wants to know when the decision will be implemented.
SC adjourns the hearing till November 2.
SC orally observes that it expects the centre's decision to be implemented by then.
Income Tax Dept carried out search & seizure y'day in case of a leading advocate practising in field of commercial arbitration & alternate dispute resolution.
He was suspected to receive substantial amounts in cash from his clients, to settle their disputes
During the search, 38 premises spread over Delhi, NCR and Haryana have been covered and cash of Rs 5.5 crores has been seized, while 10 lockers have been placed under restraint: Ministry of Finance
In one case, the assessee received Rs. 117 crore from a client in CASH, whereas he had shown only Rs. 21 crore in his records, which was through cheque.
In another case, he received more than Rs. 100 crore in cash
Delhi High Court to shortly begin hearing appeals preferred by CBI and Enforcement Directorate against the acquittal of all accused in 2G Spectrum case.
I will not say I was on my legs yesterday.. there have been two writ petitions by Rajiv Agarwal and Siddharth Behura. They were listed before Justice Navin Chawla. They will come before My Lord on Monday: Adv Vijay Aggarwal
Supreme Court is scheduled to take up for hearing shortly, petition filed by @Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan challenging the summons issued to him by Delhi Assembly's Committee in relation to #DelhiRiots2020.
Delhi High Court begins hearing actor Rakul Preet's plea to ensure that media does not broadcast any report on her in relation to the NCB investigation in the Rhea Chakraborty drug case.
We treated the Petition as a representation. There were 10 channels .. we are seeking some time to pass an order: Adv Rahul Bhatia for News Broadcasters Association
Three weeks may be granted: Bhatia
Three weeks is too much: Court
Our status report is on record: Adv Ajay Digpaul for Centre
Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain says path is clear for hearing.
Senior Adv Harish Salve for Dhrama Productions says that first a viewing of the movie be arranged for the Judge.
ASG Jain reiterates that Air Force is shown in bad light in the movie.
Whether Air Force has been shown in bad light.. that is the end.. artistic freedom comes later. We have shown that problems are there in every field. We have shown both sides of the picture: Salve
Three-judge bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan overrules the 2006 S.R. Batra And Anr vs Smt. Taruna Batra verdict wherein it was said that a wife only has rights over the property of her husband. Court rules that the wife has rights over the shared household too.
Senior Advocate Nidhesh Gupta for the respondent daughter in law had argued that if it is a joint family property then the totality of the case needs to be seen and that she has a right to reside in the house. The top court has accepted the submission.
Court also held that rights available under the Domestic Violence Act is not restricted to the domestic violence act only.
The SR Batra verdict was authored by Justices SB Sinha and Markandey Katju @mkatju