Delhi High Court begins hearing Central Govt's plea against Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl.

Case listed before Justice Rajiv Shakdher.

#GunjanSaxena

@NetflixIndia @DharmaMovies @IAF_MCC @DefenceMinIndia
Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain says path is clear for hearing.

Senior Adv Harish Salve for Dhrama Productions says that first a viewing of the movie be arranged for the Judge.
ASG Jain reiterates that Air Force is shown in bad light in the movie.

Whether Air Force has been shown in bad light.. that is the end.. artistic freedom comes later. We have shown that problems are there in every field. We have shown both sides of the picture: Salve
My case is that Air Force is not shown in bad light: Salve

This can be understood by the scene is the motion picture which is on record as the script.. as is clear for the affidavit of Ft Lt Gunjan Saxena: ASG Jain
What exactly was the disclaimer? : Court

Inspired form the life of..: Salve

When a motion pic is made with the name Gunjan Saxena.. her position in Air Force and Kargil War are facts.. the disclaimer is insignificant: ASG Jain
Was she the first woman?: Court

There was another woman.. Dharma distorted the facts.. she was third batch: ASG Jain

So it is not a factual account of what happened: Court
At the end they have shown real life Gunjan Saxena.. what is the message that is being conveyed: ASG Jain

When it's not a biopic.. when it's inspirational work of art..then some part may not show what were the real facts : Court
She was the first one in Udhampur : Salve

They can add to the disclaimer that this is the real life story not Gunjan Saxena.. something like this..: Court

Yes, we can do this : Salve
The movie says Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl.. suppose she is shown is a dream sequence or is shown to be part of a fictional family. We're fine. But the moment it is shown that an Officer is a villian.. there is a scene of arm wrestling: ASG Jain
So according to you these are factually incorrect.. you can't choose the facts that don't suit you : Court
So arm wrestling is something that didn't happen. We are deducing from that Air Force was gender bias etc... there can be a disclaimer : Court

Disclaimer can't annihilate the visual depiction: ASG Jain
Salve presses that Justice Shakdher watch the movie first.

Alright the Court may first watch the movie: ASG Jain
Disclaimer is not for sufficient time. When you distort the image of Indian Air Force..no amount of disclaimer (is enough): ASG Jain
Senior Adv Rajiv Nayar shares the disclaimer on the screen.
Nayar appears for Karan Johar.
You distort our image in the name of creative freedom. This disclaimer is an eyewash: ASG Jain
This is shooting in the dark. Your Lordship should see the movie: Salve

Yes..there is amazing performance by Pankaj Tripathi as the father : ASG Jain

Perception varies.. you may or may not agree with that.. don't try and put it in a box. They may be wrong but it's a view: Court
Today its air force.. it may be our profession.. people say there are not enough women as judges.. not enough women are seniors: Court
I won't say anything (on viewing). I'll simply adjourn it. If something can be worked out..Mr Salve..: Court
I bow down to the court's observation that we should not be over sensitive. We are proud of our Officer Gunjan Saxena.. the name of the movie is Gunjan Saxena. The impression that goes is that is real story. Our concern is her interface with Indian Air force: ASG Jain
You are trying to tell me that disclaimers make no sense .. : Court

They don't have the artistic lisence to defame Indian Air Force. Gunjan Saxena is part of Indian Air Force. It has an image at international front: ASG Jain
Who is sying that Air Force is not a premier organization? : Court
Court proceeds to adjourn the hearing.
I don't think there's any hurry: Court

Please sit with your colleagues.. Mr Salve is the senior most. Please exchange your views and sort it out: Court asks ASG Jain
Please interact and see: Court

Theatre release may be stopped : ASG Jain

Who is going to go to theatres during COVID. People have seen it. It's on OTT: Court
Matter adjourned till January 18.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

16 Oct
STUBBLE BURNING:

#SupremeCourt takes up for hearing petition highlighting the issue of stubble burning in the States of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh.

Bench led by CJI SA Bobde is hearing the petition.

#stubbleburning #AirPollution #Punjab #Haryana #UttarPradesh Image
Senior Counsel Vikas Singh for the petitioner tells the Court that the State of Punjab has filed an affidavit while States of Haryana and UP have not.

Singh argues that something needs to be done.

CJI: Don't say "something", you make specific prayers
Singh: The prayer in my petition is that a one man commission of Justice (retd) Madan Lokur can be appointed because he has dealt with many environment issues... Because state agencies and EPCA etc are not empowered and don't have any teeth to take action.

#SupremeCourt
Read 20 tweets
16 Oct
Supreme Court declines to entertain petition praying for removal of Uddhav Thackeray led government from #Maharashtra and imposition of President's rule.

CJI to petitioner: As a civilian you are liberty to approach the President, don't come here.

#SupremeCourt @OfficeofUT Image
Petitioner attempts to highlight incidents of "misgovernance"

CJI: You are saying that because some #Bollywood actor (#SushantSinghRajput) has died, the Constitutional rule is not being followed in the State?

#SupremeCourt #Maharashtra @OfficeofUT
Petitioner: There are more instances.

CJI: Every instance you have mentioned has taken place in #Mumbai. Do you know how big #Maharashtra is? Thank you, we are not inclined to entertain.

#SupremeCourt @OfficeofUT
Read 4 tweets
16 Oct
Justice AM Khanwilkar: Where is the petitioner? Why are you not speaking?

Adv ML Sharma: I am speaking

(Judges laugh): If you don't speak, how will we hear you

Adv Sharma: Sorry Madam , oh sorry Your Lordship

#courtroomexchange
#SupremeCourt
ML Sharma: Case concerns Delhi police declined to entertain the FIR regarding of a tribal women who was raped seven times and attempted to be killed. Delhi police is shielding the accused. Four time she was raped in Chattisgarh and thrice she was raped in Delhi. No CBI probe!
SC: We have given you five minutes and waiting for you to finish

Sharma: Chattisgarh police never registered FIR even though the HC ordered to register one.

SC: Show us the HC orders
Read 5 tweets
16 Oct
Delhi High Court to shortly begin hearing plea by Mohit Saraf, Senior Partner, L&L against the firm's Founder Partner, Rajiv Luthra.

Matter is before Justice V Kameswar Rao.

#MohitSaraf #RajivLuthra Image
The main contention in Saraf's plea is that he could not be summarily thrown out of L&L Partners using strong-arm tactics.

#MohitSaraf #RajivLuthra

Read more:
barandbench.com/news/ll-partne…
Rajiv Luthra has issued a public notice in the newspapers, that Mohit Saraf is no longer a Partner with L & L Partners with effect from October 13, 2020. Image
Read 193 tweets
16 Oct
The Bombay High Court is presently hearing PILs filed registering protest over the media trial being conduct in the reporting on the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput. The matter is being heard by a Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni. Image
ASG Anil Singh continues from the previous hearing - relying on the Sahara judgment.
ASG is arguing for the Union of India.

He points out from the Sahara judgment that the context and content of the offending publication has to be taken into consideration.
Read 58 tweets
16 Oct
Supreme Court to shortly hear plea by 9 women lawyers challenging the July 30 bail condition imposed by Madhya Pradesh High Court where a man accused of sexual assault was asked to get a Rakhi tied on him by the victim. Plea states such orders "objectify women".

#SupremeCourt Image
Senior Adv Sanjay Parikh: The plea has arose under extra ordinary circumstances

SC: bail condition has been met with I am sure by now
Parikh: We are not on the bail condition but the observations such as this trivialise the offences against women in sexual assault cases

SC: is your grievance limited to MP HC
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!