Supreme Court is scheduled to take up for hearing shortly, petition filed by @Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan challenging the summons issued to him by Delhi Assembly's Committee in relation to #DelhiRiots2020.
SC indicates the matter may be listed on a non miscellaneous day for hearing.
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul asks Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi if his client has sent a fresh notice to the peititoner.
Singhvi: I have done something better. My client has put it on affidavit.
Singhvi is reading from the affidavit filed by th Delhi assembly which submits that no coercive action was taken against Mohan and none lead intended to be taken if he had appeared as a witness before the Court.
Justice Kaul: Sometimes speaking too much is also an issue. When you are a body you need not say if this happens then that may happen etc.
(Justice Kaul asks Singhvi if his client is averse to filing a new notice)
Singhvi: The new notice will be in line with the affidavit.
Senior Counsel Harish Salve too refers to the affidavit filed by Delhi Assembly.
Salve highlights that the affidavit says Mohan has no right to silence, among other things.
Salve also raises the question of jurisdiction of the Delhi Assembly Committee in the issue.
SG Tushar Mehta for Centre: I also agree that Police is not under the jurisdiction of Delhi govt and the Delhi Assembly is inherently without jurisdiction
SC observes that the question essentially becomes one of jurisdiction.
Salve: To an extent that they said that I have appeared before a Parliamentary committee and I'm estopped from refusing to appear before Assembly committee
Justice Kaul: The contour of the debate is whether in matters pertaining to law and order whether Delhi government will be empowered to constitute a fact finding committee.
What is the role of the Delhi Assembly, does it have power in this.
SC indicates it will fix a date for detailed hearing.
SC says affidavits to be filed by October 31 and rejoinders within two weeks thereafter.
Senior Counsel Vikas Singh for the petitioner tells the Court that the State of Punjab has filed an affidavit while States of Haryana and UP have not.
Singh argues that something needs to be done.
CJI: Don't say "something", you make specific prayers
Singh: The prayer in my petition is that a one man commission of Justice (retd) Madan Lokur can be appointed because he has dealt with many environment issues... Because state agencies and EPCA etc are not empowered and don't have any teeth to take action.
Supreme Court declines to entertain petition praying for removal of Uddhav Thackeray led government from #Maharashtra and imposition of President's rule.
CJI to petitioner: As a civilian you are liberty to approach the President, don't come here.
ML Sharma: Case concerns Delhi police declined to entertain the FIR regarding of a tribal women who was raped seven times and attempted to be killed. Delhi police is shielding the accused. Four time she was raped in Chattisgarh and thrice she was raped in Delhi. No CBI probe!
SC: We have given you five minutes and waiting for you to finish
Sharma: Chattisgarh police never registered FIR even though the HC ordered to register one.
Rajiv Luthra has issued a public notice in the newspapers, that Mohit Saraf is no longer a Partner with L & L Partners with effect from October 13, 2020.
The Bombay High Court is presently hearing PILs filed registering protest over the media trial being conduct in the reporting on the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput. The matter is being heard by a Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
ASG Anil Singh continues from the previous hearing - relying on the Sahara judgment.
ASG is arguing for the Union of India.
He points out from the Sahara judgment that the context and content of the offending publication has to be taken into consideration.
Supreme Court to shortly hear plea by 9 women lawyers challenging the July 30 bail condition imposed by Madhya Pradesh High Court where a man accused of sexual assault was asked to get a Rakhi tied on him by the victim. Plea states such orders "objectify women".