CAC Profile picture
15 Oct, 9 tweets, 8 min read
For those new to our work on how the original meaning of the Constitution (including its Amendments), as well as the proper reading of statutory text, lead to progressive results, a thread looking at briefs we @MyConstitution have filed in major #SCOTUS cases over the years...1/x
We have been a leading progressive legal voice across matters facing #SCOTUS since 2008, on issues including defense of #abortion rights, marriage equality, #ACA, affirmative action, right to vote, environmental protection, against #QualifiedImmunity, and more.

For example: 2/x
In defense of #abortion rights, read our brief in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt: theusconstitution.org/litigation/who… 3/x
In defense of the Affordable Care Act, read our briefs in

NFIB v. Sebelius: theusconstitution.org/litigation/flo…

King v. Burwell: theusconstitution.org/litigation/kin…

#ACA 4/x
In defense of #votingrights, read our brief defending Section 5 of the #VotingRightsAct in Shelby County v. Holder: theusconstitution.org/litigation/she… 5/x
In defense of #MarriageEquality, read our briefs in

Obergefell v. Hodges: theusconstitution.org/litigation/obe…

U.S. v. Windsor: theusconstitution.org/litigation/uni…

Hollingsworth v. Perry: theusconstitution.org/litigation/hol… 6/x
In defense of environmental protection, read our briefs in

EPA v. EME Homer: theusconstitution.org/litigation/epa…

County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund: theusconstitution.org/litigation/cou… 7/x
In our advocacy against #QualifiedImmunity for law enforcement, read our briefs in:

Taylor v. Riojas, et al.: theusconstitution.org/litigation/tay…

Jessop v. City of Fresno: theusconstitution.org/litigation/mic… 8/x
To see even more of the range of our litigation work on behalf of the Constitution's text, history and values, as well as the text and purpose of statutes -- led by @ElizabethWydra and @BrianneGorod -- visit our website here: theusconstitution.org/litigation/ 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CAC

CAC Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MyConstitution

14 Oct
Today #SCOTUS will hear oral arguments in Torres v. Madrid to decide whether law enforcement officers who shoot and wound someone have conducted a “seizure” under the #4thAmendment if they fail to capture that person after. Read the brief CAC filed: theusconstitution.org/litigation/tor…
Two New Mexico police officers wanted to question Roxanne Torres as she sat in her parked car. In the darkness, Torres feared the officers were carjackers and began to drive away.

Then the officers shot her twice in the back. theusconstitution.org/litigation/tor…
The police arrested Torres at the hospital during treatment for the serious wounds she suffered. She proceeded to sue, alleging that the officers used excessive force and violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibitions of “unreasonable seizures.” theusconstitution.org/litigation/tor…
Read 6 tweets
6 Mar
An impressive array of amicus briefs from across the ideological spectrum were filed this week in the #Mazars and #DeutscheBank cases at #SCOTUS, in support of the power of Congress to get information pursuant to its investigations. Scroll through this thread to learn more!
In our brief, @MyConstitution explains the history of congressional investigations and how the Supreme Court’s precedents support broad congressional oversight power. theusconstitution.org/wp-content/upl…
Former House General Counsels, including Irv Nathan, argue that an adverse ruling in #Mazars/#Deutsche would be incompatible with the ability of Congress to function, and that under House rules, the Committees have a right to issue the subpoenas. supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/1…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!