This is a brilliant exchange. Let's analyze (thread)
Who is Andrew?
His profile looks nice and relatable (again); he clearly establishes his socialist/radical cred with his pinned tweet ("abolish the senate" is standard revolutionary leftist program all over the world).
A quick browse through Andrew's profile indicates clearly he's a Bernie style "i am totally a moderate" far leftist.
A regular citizen, he is sharp and well informed, and can make a joke. In background, a revolution beckons.
Gig economy (#AnalysisThread) favors hard work and offers little to no protections to those who want free gibs.
The state of California deems that very racist & sexist (see what they did there?) and wants to eradicate the #GigEconomy;wants to give everybody exact same conditions
Gig economy is weighted more by merit than by social capital. This makes it very un-controllable by the media, who rely on control via the #SocialCapital
The media, the progressive groups attack everything they can't control.
Large organizations (inc. labor unions) rely more on social capital than on merit. Hard to measure individual contributions; activism gives warm feels.
Anybody with social capital is given job, promotion, titles, budget - even if delivering no value; even if *negative* value.
the "muh based and redpilled" @parler_app requires providing *phone number*
to message people
over internet
>privacy
>safety
>freedom of speech
>PHONE NUMBER
miss me with this glowing stuff
but wait there's MORE😂
>arbitrary content deletion
>arbitrary deletion EVEN IF YOU OBEY THE RULES
>and the rules can change at any time without any notice - it's on you to stay up to date ;)
>HARVESTING YOUR WHOLE PHONE CONTACT LIST
Section 230 hinges on "information provided by another information content provider"
It's time to recognize that Twitter stopped providing individual tweets long time ago, and is only providing access to a tweet database that they designed, created and actively maintain /1
i.e., Twitter is providing access to their own work of art (the database of tweets) rather than to individual works of art of third party (twitter users). In which case Section 230 (c) protection don't apply anymore./2
It's time to create a new, specific legal category of database of social media posts; designed, created, and actively curated by a social media site. /3