@ktherese2 I don't even know where to start on this. Really wish I was home rn so I could type it all up. But, long story short:
1. He brought his capeshit story techniques into TV drama which laid the foundations for the MCUing of visual media.
1/?
@ktherese2 (compare it to other similar-genre shows from before Buffy like Xena and you'll see what I mean)
2. He gave ua the "snarky" and "quipster" dialogue that has plagued us ever since. It became impossible to take any situation seriously, & eventually studios stopped even trying
2/?
@ktherese2 If you're wondering why, e.g. Nebula's abusive parent backstory in Guardians of the Galaxy has to be immediately followed by an "irreverent sarcastic remark™," its bc otherwise we'd be in danger of feeling something "heavy," and Whedonesque storytelling despises this.
3/?
@ktherese2 3. Joss Whedon was the guy who popularized the degenerated meaning of "deconstruction" in fiction, which was dumbed down to mean playing with genre cliches. "What if the cheerleader killed the monster instead of the other way around?"
4/?
@ktherese2 This autism would have consequences: TVTropes grew directly out of a Joss Whedon fansite. (Buffistas)

4. Creating "nerd culture." Joss Whedon was a capeshitter, so he brought mad scientists into his supetnatural horror-comedy show even though it didn't make sense.
5/?
@ktherese2 And that was just the worst example. How dies a government black-ops anti- démon group make sense in a world where a demonic law firm secretly runs society? It doesn't, but Whedon ism is about mashing "cool" things together. It directly led to "narwhal Tesla bacon" bullshit.
6/?
@ktherese2 5. Buffy had an exaggerated radlib feminist streak included in it to compensate for Joss Whedon being a male feminist sex pest. (something the radfems called on blogs at the time) He got away with it for decades, and other pervs took notice. Yet another trend that's his fault
7/?
@ktherese2 6. On a related note, Joss Whedon had literal "Incel misogonerds" as villains in an attempt to distract you from how he was fetishizing the fuck out of his "strong female protagonists." (This production trend was what Zack Synder's "Sucker Punch" satirized. Few know this.)
8/?
@ktherese2 7. A more parochial concern: as a fan of fantasy fiction, I must note that Whedon followed his capeshit instincts yet again and turned "magic" into what's functionally a generic superpower, which all his wretched descendants also ape.
9/?
@ktherese2 (and also it was also a metaphor for drug abuse at the same time because Whedon is a fucking hack)

10/?
@ktherese2 8. A snide contempt for the very fantastic the series presupposed developed as a result of all the snark. The "Judge" monster is prophesied to be immune to weapons, but it's the current year and old shitlords didn't know about guns so rocket launchers work. 😒

11/?
@ktherese2 9. As you may have inferred from that last example, which was not at all atypical, this was the beginning of the black science man autism in mass media. It completely misunderstands everything about stories that can't be positivistically reduced to a dumbed down checklist.
12/?
@ktherese2 This was bad enough in the genre it came from. (Scorsese was right when he compared capeshit to theme parks) but it was absolutely devestating to any show that needs symbolism in general like, idk, supernatural horror fiction or fantasy.
13/?
@ktherese2 Did you wonder why no one every followed up the phenomenon of Lord of the Rings with more blockbuster high fantasy movies? It's no one could. Everyone writing speculative fiction had been either directly or indirectly dumbed down by Whedonism. 14/?
@ktherese2 10. The knockoffs. Oh God. Counting the first waves alone: Supernatural and Smallville exist only because of Buffy and that would be enough of a crime just by itself.

I could continue this forever, but I think 15 tweets is long enough. In summary:

15/15

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Friendly Whale Shark Jackson

Friendly Whale Shark Jackson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TAJackson20

24 Jun
Surprising no one, democracy failed again. It's time we explain how Canada became extremely gαγ.

George Grant's
Lament for a Nation
Chapter One
"But Jackson, how is this relevant to us AMericans in the current ye-"
But, before we get into the book proper, we're doing the intro. As you may guess by the foreboding, Grant correctly intuited that the Anti-Americanism of the 70s was imported from America itself; Canada self-owned by embracing it, bc it defined "Americanism" *on America's terms.*
Read 20 tweets
15 May
"Trump’s formulation shows how little obligation he feels to represent the places where fewer of his own voters live."

It's almost like democracy is systemic low-intensity race war or something.
"Trump has similarly argued that in granting any further aid, the federal government should require states and cities to [...] end sanctuary-city policies in locales that don’t readily cooperate with immigration authorities"
Lincoln won, Mr. @RonBrownstein. DEAL WITH IT.
The bugmen are on the other end of the Jouvenelean vice for once in their lives and suddenly they've realized that Jefferson Davis did nothing wrong lol.
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov 19
Gonna listen to this now, since, "ability to understand fascism" is one of my litmus tests. I hope @aimeeterese and @BMStudebaker don't fall into any of the pitfalls that A. James Gregor had to refute. (if neither syndicalism nor "proletarian nationalism" are mentioned...)
@aimeeterese @BMStudebaker They understand that it's a democratic phenomenon, at least. Let's see if they name the general will and Rousseau.
@aimeeterese @BMStudebaker They're getting into how fascists see folk communities as anterior to politics. This is good (and why fascism is a species of liberalism) but I'm not sure if they'll be brave enough to mention how this was derived directly from Anglo-empiricist evolutionary biology.
Read 45 tweets
15 Oct 19
The movie "Joker" is about three thing:
1. The failure of elites to be paternal and the disastrous stopgap measures to compensate, which include:
2. "Social services" whose managerial basis are incapable of solving problems such as:
3. The Eternal Single Mother
Why are there so many black women in "Joker?" Because the entire purpose of the movie is to demonstrate how the dysfunctions of the Weberian ethos of the social service bureaucracy engenders fatherless children to (SPOILERS) reproduce the conditions of their own existence.
The most tragic irony of the film is Joker telling a black psychiatrist that "you wouldn't get" the joke of his fatherless upbringing ultimately causing the death of Bruce Wayne's parents. If only she were a man! But women just don't understand.
Read 9 tweets
2 Aug 19
Okay, I've finally cleared enough of my podcast backlog to get to this. With "socialism is liberalism doubling down on failure being my main critique, I was interested in it.

Before I begin llistening I'm going to lay out my ground rules of what liberalism is, and why it's bad.
1. Liberalism is any ideology that holds that the primary purpose of political economy is increasing autonomy, usually justified by recourse to some notion of spontaneous order.
2. Spontaneous order and autonomy are both incoherent concepts. Belief otherwise is proto-liberalism.
3. Because autonomy requires a ahistorical and ateological philosophy to mentally sustain, liberalism believes that human beings are fungible atoms, in the sophistic sense of the word. Accordingly, liberal politics cannot legitimately distinguish between different kinds of human.
Read 17 tweets
10 Jul 19
Oh boy. Strap in.

1. The American Revolution was not a licit event. Aside from it's gross hypocrisy. ("How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?" is a question Yanks still can't credibly answer)
[cont.]
2. Set aside the race thing though, and the "intolerable acts" that pissed off the American Patriots so much were things like "taxes to pay off the debt of a war we started," "letting Quebec maintain Catholicism," & "honouring at least one of our treaties with Indians."
[cont.]
3. The American Founders themselves were smugglers and a not insignificant part of their anger was at the British parliament passing laws for the crazy wacker purpose of "making it easier to buy goods from merchants instead of criminals."
[cont.]
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!