This is a perspective.
Everyone should watch this because it’s a bit more balanced.
Everyone should watch this because it’s a bit more balanced.
https://twitter.com/vagishasoni/status/1317097384287981568
The minor place where I disagree with @vagishasoni:
The response to the ad is political. In terms of western equivalence, it’s like black people slamming an ad for praising slavery.
The key visual cue here is pregnancy. The girl is forced to accept terms because of pregnancy.
The response to the ad is political. In terms of western equivalence, it’s like black people slamming an ad for praising slavery.
The key visual cue here is pregnancy. The girl is forced to accept terms because of pregnancy.
Pregnancy makes the ad look like glorifying what’s seen as love jihad, or forceful use of premarital relationships to trap esp Hindu girls.
Essentially, the ad was politically insensitive. The ornaments worn are typically Hindu. This makes the ad more one sided.
Essentially, the ad was politically insensitive. The ornaments worn are typically Hindu. This makes the ad more one sided.
The bottom line is this:
What’s the ad about. What’s the target market.
What has the core idea of the ad got to do with the market realities.
How much of existing clientele got annoyed by this ad.
In a free and open market, customer is the king. Ad maker said (a)he’s the King.
What’s the ad about. What’s the target market.
What has the core idea of the ad got to do with the market realities.
How much of existing clientele got annoyed by this ad.
In a free and open market, customer is the king. Ad maker said (a)he’s the King.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
