Health Nerd Profile picture
18 Oct, 8 tweets, 2 min read
People have been asking me to debunk this thread "proving" that COVID-19 deaths are false positives by correlating things, but instead I thought I'd simply list a few things that are more well correlated than this
US spending on science, and suicides by hanging/strangulation/suffocation

99.97%

"Biology just isn't like that"
Divorce in Maine, consumption of margarine

99.26%

"Biology just isn't like that"
Arcade revenue and computer science doctorates

98.51%

"Biology just isn't like that"
These are all from the excellent Spurious Correlations website from Tyler Vigen, who also has a book out of the same name tylervigen.com/spurious-corre…
Anyway, it's perhaps not surprising that COVID-19 positive tests in hospital and deaths from COVID-19 would track somewhat, so there's not really much to debunk
No, most COVID-19 aren't false positives, even in hospital, no matter what conspiracy theorists on twitter say medium.com/@gidmk/most-po…
Oh, also, the second half of the thread can basically be explained by changes in testing between March and September, no resorting to vast government conspiracies required!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Health Nerd

Health Nerd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GidMK

20 Oct
Calling government action on COVID-19 "Health fascism" - a good start to what I'm sure will be a measured, balanced piece Image
Hm well I guess if the Human Rights Commission doesn't care about human rights during COVID-19 that would be a proble-oh, wait ImageImageImage
Moving on we have...oh, some classic denialist tropes. That's not ideal

We're now numerically above the death toll of any pandemic since 1918, and the "survival rates" give your average 60 year old a 1 in 200 risk of dying Image
Read 5 tweets
19 Oct
Sweden is set to unveil a set of tough new regulations amid growing COVID-19 cases

businessinsider.com.au/sweden-shifts-…
Depressingly, there is little evidence that the pre-existing immunity from the first wave has substantially dampened viral spread, despite earlier hopes Image
Worth noting that Tegnell himself predicted that Sweden would reach "herd immunity" by mid-May originally, until serology studies proved that this was wrong ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct
Something that I think is worth explaining:

The term "herd immunity" has a few different meanings, all of which are quite precise. This is an important point
In a very strict mathematical sense, herd immunity is the slowing of disease spread due to sufficient infected people in a population (such that Rt<1)
This leads to the second definition, which is the ability to calculate immunity within a population based on dynamics of disease spread
Read 9 tweets
14 Oct
John Ioannidis, of "Most Published Research Findings Are False" fame, has now had his paper on IFR published

Let's do one, final, twitter peer-review on the study 1/n
3/n I should say at the outset here - the only personal comment I would like to make about Professor Ioannidis is that he is a very smart man who I respect tremendously

I will, however, examine the paper, because I think that is what science is all about
Read 39 tweets
13 Oct
Imagine if someone was to say "COVID-19 hasn't caused most businesses to close, they were all doing badly anyway"
"Lots of businesses close every year, how do we know that they didn't just close WITH COVID-19 rather than FROM it?"
"All this economic impact is overblown. My friend's cousin's third ex-wife lost her business, but it was in the red anyway"
Read 6 tweets
12 Oct
Have lockdowns been bad for the economy?

A new report from the International Monetary Fund has a very interesting answer to the question 1/n
2/n The report is here, and well worth reading. At the outset I should say that ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE IS UNCERTAIN

The IMF is great, and has tried very hard to be accurate, but it is important to take care when reading these findings imf.org/en/Publication…
3/n The basic summation is simple:

- lockdowns probably cause economic harm
- large outbreaks of COVID-19 also cause harm
- it is hard to disentangle this complexity
- there are almost certainly situations in which lockdowns are beneficial to the economy
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!