Calling government action on COVID-19 "Health fascism" - a good start to what I'm sure will be a measured, balanced piece
Hm well I guess if the Human Rights Commission doesn't care about human rights during COVID-19 that would be a proble-oh, wait
Moving on we have...oh, some classic denialist tropes. That's not ideal
We're now numerically above the death toll of any pandemic since 1918, and the "survival rates" give your average 60 year old a 1 in 200 risk of dying
Moving on, we have the old false dichotomy, which pits lockdowns against no pandemic
Also, this wonderful statement by the author
And we end with a few factual errors (for example, here's the excess mortality curve for Sweden) as well as the true but perhaps not very useful observation that death is natural, as are malaria, Parkinson's disease, and cancer
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now, I think it's reasonable to assume that the proportion of people who die after being infected by COVID-19 will fall over time. It's probably true that being infected today is less deadly than earlier this year
That being said, I'm quite skeptical of the evidence presented. This story seems to claim that death rates have dropped ENORMOUSLY, while I would expect something more in the range of a relative 10-20% drop (say from 25% to 20%)
Depressingly, there is little evidence that the pre-existing immunity from the first wave has substantially dampened viral spread, despite earlier hopes
Worth noting that Tegnell himself predicted that Sweden would reach "herd immunity" by mid-May originally, until serology studies proved that this was wrong
People have been asking me to debunk this thread "proving" that COVID-19 deaths are false positives by correlating things, but instead I thought I'd simply list a few things that are more well correlated than this
3/n I should say at the outset here - the only personal comment I would like to make about Professor Ioannidis is that he is a very smart man who I respect tremendously
I will, however, examine the paper, because I think that is what science is all about