The central question no journalist is touching here still seems to be are the emails real or not? Why aren’t they attempting to answer this?
There are lots of stories about the story. Those are neat. But not a lot of work checking to see if the story is accurate or not. Not a lot of journalists seem interested in confronting that one, which is itself a fascinating media story @benyt
I’m fully willing to believe and retweet any story from any outlet that pokes holes in the facts and the legitimacy of the emails. But no one has done that yet. That seems odd to me.
Lots of other stories about Rudy and the NY Post and Fox and Twitter and so on. But oddly none that show the reporting to be misleading.
I've seen a lot of stories going after Rudy and Bannon go after the laptop repair store, the laptop repair guy, go after Fox News, go after the New York Post itself. All fair.

None that have shown the emails to be faked or are misleading or misinformation. That's weird to me.
It seems to me that the easiest way to make the New York Post eat shit on this is not through anonymous gossip or innuendo, but to prove the information they reported on is completely false. But we're not seeing that @benyt
And again, fulling willing to stipulate it could all be misinformation and be a Russian psy-op and and the emails are faked and Rudy is batshit crazy (mostly true). But no one is actually showing this. They are doing everything else it seems but answering this. That's odd.
That leaves the only other option: The emails are true. So what then? Are we no longer firefighters rushing to the story? Does truth to power go right out the window? Of course it does, because no journalists wants to be the leper in their industry should Trump win. @benyt
Twitter just slapping a “misleading” label on a story without explaining what in the story is misleading and nothing proving to be misleading should be unacceptable to any journalist who cares about their own work or reputation. But they are just siding with Twitter. Why is that?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen L. Miller

Stephen L. Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @redsteeze

11 Oct
Because these are the same people who paved the way for him to get into office and I don't think they should just be made to wash their hands of it. Trump is very temporary. He'll be gone in either 4 months or 4 years. The people who enabled him will still all be there.
Wilson created ads attacking veterans, comparing them to Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussien. Charlie Sykes made David Clarke a national name. Steve Schmidt chose McCain's running mate. Jeff Zucker - Period. And then they all just went "Hey, we have nothing to do with this" Sorry nope.
At each and every turn they played a role in steering the GOP toward Trump and then all walked away and straight into Jeff Zucker's arms or Morning Joe. Yeah sorry, doesn't work like that.
Read 4 tweets
8 Oct
She’s literally around him 22 hours a day. Please shut the fuck up.
Pence was mansplaining.

Also.. HIS WIIIIIFE
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
Hi Steve. Here's a GoFundMe for a film that has raised $65,000 in donations. It hasn't been updated in over a year and the film was never produced. The money was pocketed. Care to comment?
gofundme.com/f/everything-t…
I really wanted to see this movie
Read 5 tweets
3 Oct
Considering your ad against Max Cleland, you'd certainly know.
If you want to know how the GOP was steered toward Trumpism, this is a pretty good example of why and how, and no they don't get to wash their hands of it. They are just the other team's problem now.
The Lincoln Project *IS* Donald Trump and it took anyone with a pair of eyes and more than two brain cells to see this about 5 minutes after it was created.
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep
2 Reporters on this latest NY Times tax story essentially wrote the same story as well in 2018
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Essentially the same story, just rewritten.
Here's Susanne Craig on CNN in 2019
cnn.com/videos/politic…
Read 7 tweets
28 Sep
Just as The Atlantic did, The NY Times is counting on short memories

cnbc.com/2016/09/26/tru…
Apparently Hillary Clinton had the same information 4 years ago The NY Times does now.
This thing of retreading issues people already decided on 4 years ago get clicks. It probably gets readers. But not sure how it moves voters either way. Trump will be judged on his presidency. Not information given to people on a debate stage an entire election ago.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!