IMPORTANT THREAD RE: CHINA 1/n
Back in March, near the beginning of the US lockdown, I warned those predicting a US economic "supply shock," stemming the fall in exports by China not to count China out. That China would battle back with a vengeance,...
2/n
...using every tool at its disposal, including currency devaluation, industrial subsidies and household support - in addition to its overwhelming attack on #COVID19. I said then that China would be playing an aggressive game of economic "catch-up. >>
3/n
And China has done exactly that, with astounding success in terms of restoring growth to its economy:

"With Covid-19 Under Control, China’s Economy Surges Ahead" reported by @KeithBradsher
>>
nyti.ms/2T8bkMG
4/n
China's currency devalued rapidly during the crisis, as the #PBOC widened trading bands for the #RMB, falling to 7.14/US$1 by the end of May of this year, giving its renewed exports a strong tailwind.>>
5/n
And while the RMB has rallied against the dollar sharply since June, it has done so largely in measure with other non-Chinese major currencies, as the US economy slumped along:
6/n
Meanwhile, China supported its firms with enormous subsidies and loans:
>>
7/n
And China ramped up its always enormous investment in internal infrastructure to create additional jobs to offset its Q1 2020 downturn:
>>
8/n
China has played the game of "catch-up" well and 'for keeps' without concern for the long term condition of its trading partners. After all, its exports were in demand globally. China is, again, a net trade surplus nation:
>>
9/n
Demand for Chinese products from the manufacturing-infrastructure-starved US has surged so much that shipping costs to the US have reached all-time highs and for the most part remain so:
10/n
Meanwhile, the US administration points fingers at China, calling #COVID19 the "Kung-flu" or "Wuhan-flu." With some sections of the US right-wing even suggesting that China developed the virus as a way of attacking the rest of the world.
>>
11/n
@michaelxpettis is, of course, correct here. The foregoing will exacerbate trade conflict between China and the rest of the world.
>>
12/n
Yet China's surge back via exports has only been viable because it's trading partners have not been playing 'for keeps' themselves.
1) We have been allowing, if not encouraging via policy choices, our manufacturers to produce abroad;
2) We have failed to develop our own...
13/n
...industrial and development policies;
3) We have not invested in our infrastructure to provide domestic manufacturers with a stable source of orders (as has China); and
4) We have ignored the well-being of our households - setting off threatening political division.
>>
END
Yes, China has been playing rough, and "cheating" frequently. But, as Shakespeare wrote for Cassius's lips:

"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars. But in ourselves, that we are underlings."

We've always had the tools to step up our own game...
...and outdo China.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Alpert

Dan Alpert Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielAlpert

13 Sep
1/5
Thank you, @andrewrsorkin, for compiling these - largely, appropriately critical - essays on Milton Friedman's work of a half century ago. But one critical argument is absent: The change in composition of share ownership over the past 50 years.>> nyti.ms/2GRaXTK
2/5
As Hyman Minsky wrote sometime after Friedman's disturbing exegesis on corporate capitalism, even by the 1970s - larger by magnitudes since - the shareholders for whom profits are being generated have become isolated from corporate governance/oversight by "money managers.">>
3/5
This "money manager capitalism" is not really focused on profits, but on values reflected in stock prices. Regardless of profitability, manager-intermediaries seek, at all costs, price gains that place them in a competitive, or at least equal, position with other managers.>>
Read 5 tweets
3 Apr
MARCH 12th - keep that date in mind this morning. We will have lots to talk about regarding the #BLS employment situation report at 8:30am EDT. But remember that the test date for "jobs day" data is the 12th of the month being reported. And March 12 was before the lock downs.>>
>>Consequently, today's Non-farm Payroll data won't come anywhere near reflecting the reality of the #COVID19 pandemic impact.
Nevertheless, will be back at 8:30 and expect to see a material, if early, loss of front line low-wage/low-hours - see why, here: jobqualityindex.com
#BLS #NFP Payrolls decline by 701,000 with the unemployment rate at 4.4. This is just the tip of the iceberg as the reference date for the data is the week ending March 13th, before the social and economic lock downs. But really bad.>>
Read 14 tweets
11 Mar
If I had a $ for each time I have heard MMT used positively over the past month, I could monetize the debt of an average US household! The markets, CEOs and not just a few pols are cutting from "mainstream" economists. My prediction: An epochal change, the likes of 1932 and 1980.
See, for example, this from today:

Rishi Sunak to signal end of austerity with huge leap in borrowing - giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/ac… via @FT
And, you might see my piece from the weekend as to why this is happening - and should be (in which I never actually refer to MMT - just its essential logic):
businessinsider.com/coronavirus-bo…
Read 4 tweets
1 Nov 19
#BLS Today's job's report will be the last prior to the launch of the U.S. Private Sector Job Quality Index (JQI) on November 14th, which will thereafter be updated and released on each "jobs day." #JQI is a collaborative of @Cornell, @cpa_tradereform, @UMKC and @GISP_Tweets,>>
>and tracks shifts in job quality related to relative levels of weekly income (wages times hours) on a real time basis from month to month. The JQI reveals is three decades of astonishing job quality decline, reflecting a substantial increase in the number of>>
> production and non-supervisory jobs that are below the mean level weekly incomes of all such jobs. In 1990, 52.7% of those jobs fell below the mean – but since then, 63% of all net new job formation has been lower wage/lower hours. >>
Read 10 tweets
28 Sep 19
THREAD:
1/10
To all folks out there convinced that 20 Republicans cannot be found to turn against Trump, let me point out the following. There are three Republicans retiring from the senate who have the latitude to do the right thing. And, of course, there is Romney who almost>>
2/10
>>certainly will. Now, for the rest, there are 20 Republicans up for reelection in 2020 who are not retiring. Let's assume all of them would have a problem (although, frankly, a couple - like Susan Collins - may have more of a problem if they DON'T vote to remove Trump).>>
3/10
>>So that leaves 30 Republican Senators who are facing a different calculus - 22 of whom are up for reelection in 2022. They face two unknowns if they vote not to remove Trump: (a) whether he wins or loses in 2020, and (b) whether Republicans hold or lose the Senate then.>>
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!