Some future gazing on #Brexit. Two possible scenarios under consideration...
1. We get a deal before the end of the transition. It's thin for goods, with the benefits broadly limited to zero tariffs, at least on paper if not always in practice (see rules of origin &#automotive), & largely nonexistent for services.
The new world of trading on an FTA comes with considerable new cost that sends some businesses to the wall, and new friction that will cause significant disruption in some places (see Kent), but none in others.
Despite the evident cost, business, so relieved to have avoided no deal, will hold their tongue. But, political discontent will rumble on under the surface, with the ERG continuing to agitate for the WA to be scrapped, as well as the new FTA.
Con division over Europe will continue, but in a new form, acting as a disruptive force behind the scenes, before rearing its head in the run up to the next election, when N. Ire is asked to consent to the Protocol in 2024 & when the Con elect a new leader. #Brexit won't go away.
2. We don't get a deal this year. The immediate (i.e. in the first two to four wks) shock won't be dissimilar to the thin deal scenario (border disruption etc), but tariffs will have devastating consequences as their impact surges through the econ throughout 2021 and beyond.
Many businesses won't survive. Despite this, govt. won't run back to the negotiating table, preferring instead to stir patriotic "Blitz spirit", in response to the harm it will claim the EU has inflicted on the UK.
Even a landslide victory for the SNP in Scottish elections will not prompt a change of approach, as stubborn pride drives decision making. Instead, fuel will simply be added to the nationalist fire.
The ERGers, delighted that no deal has been agreed, will feel emboldened in their push to scrap the WA. They will continue to agitate & play a disruptive role within the Conservative party.
On the other side of the spectrum, space will open up for Labour to argue that the Conservatives had a chance to deliver Brexit with a deal, as they had promised to do, and they blew it.
Labour will eventually ask the electorate to trust them to repair the damage and deliver the Brexit that was promised in 2016, i.e. Brexit, with a trade deal that secures the economic benefits of EU membership.
Come the next election, our relationship with the EU will still be a significant issue. The Cons will advocate still living in a no-deal world. Lab will promise to deliver the #Brexit that they was actually offered in 2016.
Irrespective of the result, Brexit won't go away.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some future gazing regarding #Brexit. Two possible scenarios for consideration, and under both, Brexit just doesn’t go away.
1.We get a deal this year. It's thin for goods, with the benefits broadly limited to zero tariffs, at least on paper if not always in practice (see rules of origin & #automotive), & largely non-existent for services.
This new FTA world comes with considerable new cost that sends some businesses to the wall, and new friction that will cause significant disruption in some places (see Kent), but not everywhere.
...Sounds pretty cool, if a bit old. But, it's a multilateral treaty, rather than an Australia deal with the EU. Plus it doesn’t relate to trade. Not to worry, there are loads of others.
I'm a little late this this, but this conversation between @rafaelbehr & @fotoole on #Brexit, nationalism & a lot more besides is terrific. Highly recommended listening.
I particularly enjoyed the analysis of the Italian Job & the fascinating observation regarding the symbolism of the Union flag (prominent at the beginning of the film) being replaced by the flag of St. George, as English football fans descend on Turin.
This is all the more interesting since the Italian Job was made only three yrs after Eng. won the World Cup in front of a crowd full of waving Union flags.
A few thoughts on the extent to which the EU does, or does not have a strategy when it comes to (i) #Brexit; and (ii) its long term relationship with the UK.
I have previously argued that the #EU appeared to be determined to treat the phase-two negotiations as though #Brexit were simply a matter of trade, rather than what it actually represents, namely the most extraordinary geopolitical curveball thrown in the west in a generation.
However, this depiction of the #EU’s approach isn’t quite fair. The EU is treating phase-two, both as a matter of trade, but also as a threat to it’s own short, medium & long-term interests.
Following some interesting exchanges, here’s a few late night thoughts on the extent to which the EU does, or does not have a strategy when it comes to (i) Brexit; and (ii) its long term relationship with the UK.
I have previously argued that the EU appeared to be determined to treat the phase-two negotiations as though Brexit were simply a matter of trade, rather than what it actually represents, namely the most extraordinary geopolitical curveball thrown in the west in a generation.
However, this depiction of the EU’s approach isn’t quite fair. The EU is treating phase-two, both as a matter of trade, but also as a threat to it’s own short, medium & long-term interests.
Stuck in a queue at the border? Take a quick break at the #Brexit drive-thru.
What can I get you?
Brexit
Okay. And how would you like that?
Hard
Can you be a bit more precise?
Certainly. I want complete regulatory autonomy, no EU laws anywhere in this most united of United Kingdoms, and the same Brexit for all four nations. Got it?
Sure. Anything else?
Well, I’m told I shouldn’t threaten peace and security. Best add a side order of “respecting the Good Friday Agreement”.