Thread by @ClimateAudit

on Jan 24, 2017, Danchenko and Flynn were interviewed more or less simultaneously. The terms under which Flynn, a veteran decorated for personal courage, and Danchenko, a Democrat spy who had been investigated previously as possible Russian spy, were very different.

2/ we learn from New York Times today what we suspected - that DOJ gave a grant of immunity to Danchenko - presumably coming from Democrat candyman David Laufman, who had previously given immunity to Hillary henchpersons Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin etc

3/ Danchenko's immunity was given even though FBI/DOJ then did not know what role, if any, he had in fabrication of Steele dossier. Information from Danchenko was highly exculpatory of Trump because it showed massive fraud in Steele dossier.

4/ but instead of promptly disseminating Danchenko's exculpatory information to deter nascent resistance, FBI concealed the information acquired at the heavy price of immunity to Danchenko. Making Laufman's devil's bargain even worse.

5/ meanwhile, FBI offered no such candy to Flynn. Exactly the opposite. Flynn was denied not only the courtesy that he had earned and deserved through a career of service, but even the usual rights and notices given to an ordinary criminal. He was simultaneously attacked by

6/ attacked by leaks of supposedly classified information to media, the most damaging of which were actually false.

7/ The difference is now evident as New York Times and Guardian now apply more whitewash. Danchenko and Steele had Democrat privilege, Flynn didn't.

Corruption that would make Ukraine blush.