". . . it was screams."

How does this happen logistically? How did they operationally screw up like this? An immoral policy, yes. But implementation was also beyond excuse because an easy data fix could have solved the inevitable issue of reunification. A brief history. 1/
Customs and Border Protection at DHS documents unlawful immigrants in a database. It has different screens depending on status of detainee. One such screen was "unaccompanied minor" so an agent could put in data about those (mostly teen boys) who showed up WITHOUT A PARENT! 2/
There was no screen for separated families b/c it wasn't done, so the children were inputed as unaccompanied minors. See where this is going? That meant that there was no data entry for who the parent was, their status, identifiers, country of origin, etc., of the child/baby. 3/
That's an easy technology fix and would have allowed CBP to continue to input data as parents were processed and children/babies were processed "as a unit" rather than the children/babies processed as unaccompanied minors as if they crossed the border alone. 4/
1000s of people knew this. 100s of people could have fixed it. 10s of people could have demanded it. And at least a dozen, including Secretary Nielsen, her staff and the WH, could have stopped it because they knew what was happening. They knew the horror unfolding ahead. 5/
The policy was immoral. Implementation indefensible. A simple data input could have been constructed in hours and upgraded to the CBP portal.

545 children without their parents and " . . the screams."
Forgiveness, moving on, let history decide is not in the calculation. 6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Juliette Kayyem

Juliette Kayyem Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @juliettekayyem

19 Oct
THREAD ON VACCINES: The National Governors Association -- representing all of them -- has serious questions about logistics of vaccination distribution. Trump answers only that "military" will do it. And gov guidelines issued earlier were not specific. 1/
governor.ny.gov/news/national-…
I advise some of these offices. Money, of course, is always an issue but it goes beyond money. Let's assume, first, there is a vaccine. An assumption: pray for it, but plan otherwise (i.e. #wearadamnmask). If there is one, supply chain and logistics criteria are essential. 2/
These include important factors such as vaccine viability, ultracold storage, and prioritization when supply is short (or comes in waves, which it will). It also includes what sort of leeway states will be granted to administer their own criteria. 3/
Read 8 tweets
14 Oct
When history about floor dropping on Trump these last 2 weeks is written, this 21 seconds from debate -- with Biden assist -- was beginning. 21 seconds. #VOTE

1:04:46 TRUMP
Sure, I’m prepared to do it. I would say- I would say, almost everything I see is from the left-wing 1/
not from the right wing-
1:04:55 WALLACE
So what do you, what do you say-
1:04:56 TRUMP
I'm willing to do anything I want to see peace.
1:04:57 WALLACE
Then do it, sir.
1:04:59 BIDEN
Say it, do it, say it.

2/
1:05:00 TRUMP
You want to call them -- What do you want to call them? Give me a name, give me --
1:05:04 WALLACE
White supremacists and, white supremacists and right-wing --
1:05:07 BIDEN
The Proud Boys.

3/
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
On #stochasticterrorism. For years, it's been Trump's plan -- promote violence without saying when/where. His words -- "stand back and stand by" -- were odd enough that his team feigns plausible deniability, but his adherents know exactly what he meant #debates 1/
We shouldn't be afraid to say Trump incites terror. Don't just say violence. That misses the point. It is violence for political purposes, which is terrorism.
Stochastic is awkward, but here is @Dictionarycom definition after I used it on air
2/
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep
The disinformation move is predictable. It is how radicalization also works. Whispers online, Russian bots, Trump tweet, FOX news primetime, impacted parties left to respond, reporters figure out truth. It's predictable. 4 years later, their moves are the same. Why are ours? 1/
In so many cases, institutions think that silence will make it go away (nope) or that engagement makes them seem partisan (nope). We know how disinformation works now. Engagement may not change all minds, but silence is used by them as a weapon. Silence is handing them fuel. 2/
The Commission on Presidential Debates has equities to defend their stated purpose "to meet its ongoing goal of educating voter" "for the benefit of the American electorate." Respond to lies. Make clear what was asked, requirements, standards. Assert agency. Every single time. 3/
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
Again, the military is necessary for major domestic logistics. They always work in civilian supply chain as support and a whole #logistics regime exists under defense support of civilian authorities (DSCA). This exclusive @statnews about vaccine distribution plan is troubling.1/
So here's a read of the chart. DSCA doesn't appear to be utilized, another time when the logistical planning is in place and WH goes in another direction. In addition, what's with the joint leads? Doesn't work like that. We don't do Kumbaya. 2/
statnews.com/2020/09/28/ope… Image
FEMA is hard to find, the civilian agency that actually does logistical distribution in homeland and can task military to satisfy bulk needs. In chart, it looks like the COO is a military person; that strikes me as a bad fit for state, local, territorial & tribal delivery 3/
Read 4 tweets
25 Sep
Thread. Civil war? This is nonsense and not helpful. It assumes we don't have agency. Anyone who goes from Defcon 5 to 1 like this is lacking in analysis. Just lazy. Am I worried? Of course, so plan. Do I think there is a likelihood Trump follows his words? #homelandsecurity 1/
Low likelihood but high consequence event so we shouldn't be shy calling him on it, nor "ratchet it down." The most likely scenario still is a peaceful transition of power to Biden with violence by radicalized Trump supporters who listen to his words. #stochasticterrorism
2/
But between Trump's words, his campaigns actions and Friedman's civil war, mayors and governors are on notice and they are doing a lot in anticipation of both unlawful vigilantes as well as "color of law" deployment. Trainings and briefings and comms strategies are ongoing. 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!