It is extraordinary that #Covid19 has turned @BorisJohnson into more Castro than Castro. By the time the remade Job Support Scheme, the Self-employed grant and the business grants terminate at the end of March, we will have experienced a whole year of an economy more...
socialised - more socialist - than at any point in British history. Countless millions of workers and business owners will have had their income subsidised by @RishiSunak and the Treasury by between 40% and 80% for all or part of the year. It is a bail out unprecedented...
in peacetime, and is not unlike the socialisation and collective endeavour of a world war. It will redefine us as a nation, and not just because the associated increase in the nation’s debt of well over £300bn won’t be repaid in most of our lifetimes. The more important...
consequence is that never again can mainstream politicians say what was seen as truism for the post-Thatcher era, that it is NOT the role of the state to take on the financial risk of keeping workers in their jobs during an economic or technological shock. So very soon after...
leaving the EU, the UK has tilted towards the European safety-net model, and away from the US model of endemic job insecurity. Politically this poses a significant challenge for Labour, because it will be hard for any Labour leader to argue that Johnson’s Tories are...
in thrall to the free market. If around 10m workers have been on furlough at some point, there are likely to be at least three million benefitting from the remade Job Support Scheme (on the basis of numbers still on furlough and the depressing impact of the covid “tiers”...
on business conditions) - which would suggest the state will shell out at least £9bn by the end of March just to subsidise the pay of workers whose employers can’t afford to pay them for full-time work and maybe can only afford to pay them for a day a week...
of work. Here is the sting. If these are jobs that suddenly become productive again in the spring, then this work subsidy scheme will have prevented 3m additional people being laid off, and their employing companies and the economy will be able to bounce back...
rapidly. An unnecessarily longer term economic slump will have been prevented. But what if there isn’t a vaccine by then? And what if the economy can’t reopen as usual? Or what if our spending habits shift in a permanent sense? Then Johnson and Sunak will face...
a Solomonic test of their judgement, whether to continue subsidising jobs on an unprecedented scale or whether to risk a delayed and massive surge in unemployment. I look forward to hearing Johnson explain why it is heathy for the UK to be...
Cuba without the sunshine for a year, an economy in which every job can be preserved via unprecedented subventions using borrowed money, but any longer than that would be the short cut to penury. As I say, economic interventions on this scale have profound social and...
cultural consequences.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Who was wrong not to close a deal over a gap of £5m - Boris Johnson or Andy Burnham? The Treasury signed off a £55m package to support businesses and employees hurt by the Tier 3 closures. Burnham said he would accept £65m. The PM personally offered Burnham a compromise...
of £60m on the basis it would not undermine support he had given to Lancs and Liverpool. Burnham argued he had already compromised. Talks collapsed. Downing St tells me what matters now is imposing the Tier 3 restrictions - and insists it will take steps to limit the hurt...
to businesses and employees who can no longer work. But it won't say the £60m package is still there. In the meantime, most of the rest of the country probably cannot understand why central and local governments cannot agree on a decision about saving lives...
Just to be clear, a mob of EU officials were already booked on eurostar to come to London tomorrow for technical talks on the free trade deal long before the phone call this pm between @DavidGHFrost and @MichelBarnier. So @michaelgove's billing of the intensification...
of the talks - rather than their collapse - as a great victory for @BorisJohnson is classic Govian spin. That intensification was inevitable. Johnson's "walk out" was theatre. The real deadline for the talks is 15 November, because any later and ratification becomes impossible...
The point is that there has been much more progress towards agreement than @michaelgove is prepared to concede. In the EU, they still expect and hope for a deal. And if there isn't one, it's because - they think - the PM will have worked out that there will be massive...
Tonight all attention is on the unusual alliance of right wing Tory MPs and Labour local officials, led by @AndyBurnhamGM, who for very different reasons want to keep Manchester out of Tier 3 restrictions (the Tories because they see the social cure as worse than the...
disease, Manc Labour because they want more compensation for damaged businesses and workers). But the economic impact of the imposition of Tier 2 restrictions on London, the biggest hospitality market in the UK by a...
country mile, will be significant. The prospects for pubs and restaurants are dire once again - and under the terms of the Job Support Scheme it is now much more expensive for them to keep staff on their books (they pay half wages for roughly a third of hours), and...
You might have noticed that NHS Test and Trace, the £12bn service supposed to tell us who has the virus and where, isn't yet world class in the way @BorisJohnson promised it would be. On 10 Sept @DavidDavisMP asked @MattHancock whether Serco and Sitel...
which provide call handling services for track and trace, would be subject to penalties if they fail to meet targets. His ministerial colleague @Helen_Whately has replied that "contract penalties...were not included in test and trace contracts with Serco or Sitel"...
Which many would see as shocking. And what Davis also regards as extraordinary, as I think would anyone with experience in business, is that she justifies the absence of any performance clauses of this sort on the basis that "contractual penalties are often unenforceable...
If you wondered why @CMO_England told me the “baseline” measures in “very high” category of measures would not be sufficient to halt exponential growth of virus, attached is why - which is summary of paper from government advisers SAGE from 21 Sept, but just...
published saying pub closure not nearly enough to halt infections and hospitalisations to save lives. Restaurants, cafes, hairdressers and gyms would need to be closed too. All university teaching should go online. And there may need to be short national circuit-breaking lockdown
Re Kate Bingham's interview with @FT, where she says that vaccinating the whole population is "not going to happen" and would be "misguided", she is deferring the holy grail of herd immunity for months beyond next spring, and saying we will be living with the virus for years...
Because as chair of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, she is saying that only the old, vulnerable and those working in healthcare settings will be vaccinated. In other words the vaccine would be protection for those most likely to become acutely ill or whose services are most needed...
But all the evidence shows that young people are the principle spreaders of the virus, which would still be in the community. And we would still need to maintain social distancing, since we could never be confident that a vaccine would deliver...