Great news! Two Texas brothers just defeated one of the dumbest attacks on #ReligiousFreedom you will find: Their school banned them from all sports and clubs unless they cut sacred braids they’ve kept as a religious vow since birth. bit.ly/2VzqJHB 1/ Image
In Cesar’s infancy, his parents made a religious vow never to cut a lock of his hair if he was healed from meningitis. He was healed, and he and his brother have kept the vow ever since. This kind of “promesa” has deep roots among Mexican Catholics. 2/ Image
From K-6th grade, the Mathis TX school district let the boys keep their hair without any problems. But in 7th grade (2017) the district barred them from all interscholastic competition. Cesar was banned from football; Diego was taken off the Science Team. 3/ Image
The school says long hair violates a “grooming” rule. But it offers no reason for the rule other than “it’s just been a community standard, the way...it’s always been.” Meanwhile, other Texas schools--and even prisons--allow religious long hair: bit.ly/2S6ivon 4/ Image
In Sept 2019, a federal court ruled that forcing the boys to cut their braids would violate their religious freedom. fxn.ws/3eWzEe0. Obviously. The school should have quit then. But no--it kept digging. 5/
The school appealed, claiming that the court has “created a bastion of anarchy that will imminently devastate education.” (Yes, the school’s legal brief really said that.) 6/ Image
While making this argument with a straight face--and saying these devout boys are too unkempt to represent the school--this is the school’s mascot: 7/ Image
On appeal, the school didn’t try to defend its policy. Instead, it tried to get off on a technicality, saying the boys needed to give the school advance notice of their lawsuit by certified mail, rather than by fax. (Yes, that was the ONLY argument the school made on appeal) 8/
Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit rejected that argument, saying that Cesar didn’t need to provide further notice. Here's the opinion: s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/… 9/
Although the court ruled Diego should have provided additional notice, it said that is “of little practical consequence,” because once the policy is struck down as to Cesar, Diego will “enjoy the benefits from that ruling” too. 10/
Now the ball is in the school district’s court. Will the Mathis ISD (mathisisd.org/index.aspx) keep fighting this foolish fight? Or will it do the right thing and respect these boys’ #ReligiousFreedom? 11/
Public schools should respect religious diversity. And these boys should be commended, not punished, for faithfully keeping a religious vow for over 15 years. /fin Image
Kudos to Jamie Aycock, Kenneth Young, and Kelsee Foote @Kirkland_Ellis and Texas attorney Frank Gonzales for taking on this case. @calebparke @FoxNews

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luke Goodrich

Luke Goodrich Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LukeWGoodrich

6 May
Key takeaways from the Little Sisters argument @ #SCOTUS today:
1. It was clear the gov’t has many ways to give out contraception. It doesn’t need to conscript nuns. So #ReligiousFreedom protects the Sisters.
2. The states haven’t identified a SINGLE woman ever denied coverage due to a religious exemption. As the Obama Admin admitted, they get coverage on family plans, on the exchange, or other gov’t programs. Zero harm.
3. The states' argument was exposed as startlingly broad. It not only attacked the exemption for the Sisters. It said the gov’t even lacked authority to exempt CHURCHES. Alito jumped on this; no Justice seemed to buy it.
Read 6 tweets
19 Feb
#BREAKING: The 11th Circuit just ruled that the #BayviewCross, which has stood in a @CityofPensacola park for almost 80 years, is allowed to STAY! This is a major victory for #ReligiousFreedom and an important new precedent: 1/ s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/…
@cityofpensacola The cross was erected by Pensacola citizens in 1941, just months before the US entered WWII. It has long been a gathering place for community events and it is a valued part of the city’s history and culture: becketlaw.org/case/kondratye… 2/
@cityofpensacola In 2016, an atheist group sued to remove the cross, saying it was offensive. (One plaintiff used the cross for his “Satanic rituals.” Another was recently sentenced to 15 days in prison for throwing a drink on a U.S. Congressman: pnj.com/story/news/201…) 3/
Read 12 tweets
4 Feb
#BREAKING: A federal court has thrown out criminal convictions of four volunteers who left food and water in the desert for migrants at risk of death. The court said prosecuting them violated #RFRA--a major victory for #ReligiousFreedom! 1/ s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/…
Fueled by faith, these volunteers traveled to the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, where migrant deaths are common, placing food & water along foot trails to prevent future deaths. 32 sets of human remains were recovered from this area in 2017 alone. 2/ credit: Google
Proving no good deed goes unpunished, the government criminally prosecuted the volunteers for entering the refuge & “abandoning property” (i.e., food & water) without a permit (even though no permit would allow them to leave food or water for migrants anyways). #Kafkaesque 3/
Read 14 tweets
27 Nov 19
This is a bizarre case of progressives siding with the #Trump Administration and throwing Muslims and their civil rights under the bus--even when the supposed “benefit” for LGBT folks is nonexistent.

This is open hostility to #ReligiousFreedom: 1/

vox.com/policy-and-pol…
It's also wrong about who RFRA protects. Our empirical study of religious freedom cases shows that the groups getting the most benefit are non-Christian minorities, not Christians. Bleating "Hobby Lobby" doesn’t change that: 2/
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Most obviously, on the specific RFRA issue #SCOTUS is reviewing ($ damages against federal officials), there have been 8 lower-court cases:
- 7 for Muslims
- 1 for a Hebrew-Israelite
- All but 1 were prisoners
- ZERO were Christians.
Read 6 tweets
15 Oct 19
#BREAKING: Huge victory for #ReligiousFreedom:
A federal court just struck down the controversial #TransgenderMandate, which tried to force doctors to perform potentially harmful gender-transition procedures against their conscience and medical judgment:
becketlaw.org/media/court-do…
A 2016 HHS regulation, governing nearly every doctor nationwide, said doctors must perform gender-transition procedures, even on children, & even when the procedures could be harmful and were against the doctors’ conscience and medical judgment.
transgendermandate.org 2/
HHS did this by issuing a regulation redefining “sex” to include “gender identity,” and saying doctors who don’t perform gender transition procedures would be punished for “sex” discrimination:
govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR… 3/
Read 15 tweets
15 Mar 19
BREAKING: a federal appeals court just upheld the constitutionality of tax-exempt housing allowances for ministers--sparing churches and ministers across the country almost $1 billion per year in new taxes.

This is a HUGE victory for religious freedom. 1/
2. The court’s decision is here: s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/….
@BECKETlaw’s press release is here: becketlaw.org/media/court-pr….
3. Key quote from the court: “Myriad provisions in [the tax code]...allow hundreds of thousands of employees...to receive tax-exempt housing every year.” This “is simply one of many per se rules that provide a tax exemption to employees with work-related housing requirements.”
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!