2/ What will decide the election? Covid? Jobs? @realDonaldTrump has an excellent record on jobs and has strengthened the economy even during the era of #Covid19...I can only imagine what kind of corruption would take place if @JoeBiden had to handle this…
3/ @JoeBiden and @KamalaHarris can't decide what they want more - money or votes? #JoeBiden honestly thinks the American people will not hold him accountable for his positions - is he just forgetful or is there some cognitive disconnect there?
4/ Millions of Americans lost their health insurance plans under #ObamaCare. During @realDonaldTrump's presidency we've experienced an economic boom and expansion of jobs in minority communities while the Dems want to impose massive taxes, #GreenNewDeal, and destroy our economy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This stuff looks shady as hell. I guess that whole "know your customer thing" under the Patriot Act has a whole different meaning if the VP's son is greasing the skids for a shady Russian billionaire trying to access US banking.
I am so angry that fellow Rs have yielded control of debates to this club of bloviating "nobles." Danforth has been in the COPD 26 YEARS!!! In the Senate 18 years! He's 84, has spent more than half his life in the swamp. Frank Fahrenkopf's another superannuated octogenarian.
2/ These decaying institutions and the priestly class of salon-cocktail-circuit, masters of the DC-universe who run them, thrive on a weakened, losing GOP, because only then do they have power, are they relevant, can they get contracts and TV gigs and "help rebuild." Beware.
3/Beware the grifter "principled" Republicans voting for Biden, getting paid to push propaganda, claiming to be "doing the right thing." They are mercenaries, nothing more. A These guys would rather lose and be well-fed mascots of the left, than win elections & expand liberty.
Among the "info" @AGBecerra wanted to force us to reveal today, is NAMES of citizens who handed their ballots to GOP volunteers/staff in churches, gun stores, GOP offices, & other trusted places, where they were placed in secure, locked boxes & promptly delivered to ROV. Why?
2/ I would love the CA media to ask the AG why his office has never asked a union for the names of citizens who handed their ballots to the teamster, why there is a ginned-up, multi-press-conference drama over ZERO accusations of ballot mishandling, ZERO voters complaining?/
3/ Why exactly does the Democrat Secretary of State think it is ok to harass citizens who give their ballots to Republican ballot collectors? What does he intend to do with this information? Nothing good, I can tell you that. This is thuggish voter intimidation pure and simple.
2/4: My concern about the format of the #PresidentialDebate2020 - I expect @POTUS will likely be cut off arbitrarily but he will also have a chance to ask @JoeBiden the tough questions that the American people want to know.
3/4: Will the media question @JoeBiden on corruption? Who has #Biden sold out our country to? Why is the media refusing to question the Biden family directly? What about his involvement in #Burisma? The American people deserve answers.
Speaking of Amy Coney Barrett not being some big government ogre, let's take a look at her ruling on qualified immunity in the case of a police detective who allegedly framed an innocent family man for murder -- she wasn't having it: reason.com/2020/09/23/amy…
2/ Conservatives are divided on the issue of qualified immunity. This judicially-created doctrine shield government wrongdoers high and low, from individual liability for violating Americans' civil rights. Like the ATF agents who shoot your dog when breaking down the wrong door/
3/ or the campus administrators who say that some "reformed" terrorist or that white fragility charlatan can speak on campus but @AnnCoulter or @MrAndyNgo can't. Why should they get away with violating the constitution? They shouldn't, but thanks to qualified immunity, they do!/
1/ I've seen some conservative huffing and puffing about Judge Barrett being a "statist" because she refused to enjoin Illinois' coronavirus restrictions. So I thought I would actually read the Sept. 2 opinion in Illinois Republican Party v. Pritzker, which she joined (3-0).../
2/ and the case is about whether, in the name of the 1st Amendment, the Illinois GOP was entitled to the same exemption from the 50-person gathering cap that houses of worship enjoy under Pritzker's orders, which merely "urge" religions institutions to adopt now-familiar limits/
3/ but everyone else has to follow the 50-person cap. By attacking the lack of a binding limit for houses of worship the party hoped to expand its ability to gather, but the three-judge panel including Judge Barrett rejected their reasoning, as had Justice Kavanaugh in declining/