Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 220

1/ Yesterday was @UCSF Medicine Grand Rounds– we covered the 3rd wave (w/ particular focus on situation in Wisconsin) and how to assess and manage risk in Covid. The conference (70 min) is available here: tinyurl.com/y2to6y9y Worth watching.
2/ @ 5:00: First, an update by George Rutherford on the current surge. The U.S. is now at >60K cases/d. This map, from @nytimes, shows that while biggest surge is in the Midwest, unlike surges 1 and 2 this is really a national surge, with only a few exceptions (one of them CA).
3/ @ 7:30: In California, “no evidence of a 3rd wave…yet.” “I have a feeling that we’re teetering at the precipice, and we need to be absolutely positively clear that we’re doing everything we can to avoid infection.”
4/ @ 9:30: San Francisco continues to do very well, with R-effective estimate of 0.94. George makes point that the Re is an average across a population, which hides the fact that there are some people that don’t spread at all, while others are super-spreaders.
5/ @ 10:30: Why is CA doing well? Slide shows various factors, including more use of masks, slow & steady reopening, control of institutional outbreaks, & mature contact tracing system. Maybe some contribution of weather, compared w/ other areas where folks are now forced inside.
6/ @ 11:40: Compelling graph of states, with frequency of mask usage on Y axis, vs. Covid case rates on X axis. Rutherford: It's simple – “as mask wearing goes down, case counts go up.”
7/ @ 13:00: While mortality rates are lower, we’re starting to see an uptick in deaths. Current projection: we’ll have 389K deaths by 2/1/21. If really bad behavior, could be as high as 483K; if everybody wears masks, could be as low as 315K.

Note: deaths in World War II: 405K.
8/ @ 14:00: CDC finds ~300K excess deaths – ~2/3rds directly attributable to Covid, the rest likely related to missed care, miscoded Covid deaths, stress from the pandemic, and more. This excess death number is probably a better reflection of the pandemic’s true toll.
9/ @ 16:00: George’s advice for a safe Halloween? The usual: masks, distancing, etc. "And, when you're done for the evening, brush your teeth."

I asked about whether Halloween masks would work for Covid? Answer: “No. Unless you’re playing an ICU worker wearing a PAPR.”
10/ Next up @ 21:30, hospitalist @SheehyAnn and ICU doc Andrew Braun from Univ. Wisconsin. For now, they're seeing only a modest surge, with about ~40 pts (10 in ICU) in a 600-bed hospital, but they’re expecting much more. Northern WI is getting the brunt of it for now.
11/ @ 23:30: Mask wearing in Madison, WI has been strong, but not true in the rest of the state. A state-wide mask mandate is being challenged in the courts, and it's being ignored in many regions. Ann: “We’ve been begging for a consistent public health mandate.”
12/ @ 25:45: Ann describes what’s happening w/ undergrads. Huge outbreak in early Sept, w/ dorms shut, fraternities/sororities quarantined. They’ve had ~3000 infected students, out of ~45,000 students. Test positivity rate in September was up to 33% (!) among students/faculty.
13/ @ 33:00: we discuss why UW hospital isn't slammed yet. George lists various factors that may be at play: younger pts, masking may be cutting severity. But worry about a lag: w/ young pts being hit first, who will then give it to older people, who will be sick in 1-2 wks.
14/ @ 36:45, final segment with @JuliaLMarcus, Harvard ID epidemiologist. Our 30 minute conversation is so far reaching and nuanced that I won’t be able to do it justice here. Just a few highlights below.
15/ March & April: We had a “clear & binary messaging: stay home.” Because it was simple, it was very easy, in a way (though not equitable – some couldn’t stay home). The challenge now is: “how can we do this sustainably" – particularly since we probably have >6 more mths to go.
16/ As we think about the risk of transmission, we’re always making tradeoffs. How do we, as individuals and as a society, make good decisions that we can live with over time? And how do we process not just the potential harms of our choices, but also the benefits?
17/ I asked about my decision to visit my 90 & 84 year old parents in FL. Seeing a loved one, or going to work when you absolutely must – these seem similar to safer-sex education. Abstinence (long term) won't work; key issue is mitigating risk, using a harm-reduction framework.
18/ Lessons from HIV: shaming people for taking risks – “if you cared about people you wouldn’t do this” – doesn’t work well. “We need to try to empathize" – moralistic public health campaigns aren’t effective, in part because they perpetuate stigma & make people go underground.
19/ @ 47:00: I pushed back re: HIV analogy. With Covid, we’re not talking about consensual sex; we’re talking about someone wearing a mask and – if they don't – putting me at risk. Julia agreed: because Covid is much more explosive, we do need mandates in certain settings.
20/ @ 55:00: I asked how we can make 100 incredibly complex & nuanced risk-benefit decisions daily. "It's crazy-making," particularly since we have so little credible guidance from authorities. “It’s like the parents have left the room…unfortunately, we’re on our own,” she said.
21/ We need to factor pandemic fatigue into our thinking – “ ...to focus our efforts on the highest risk settings,” but be a bit more lenient about behaviors that carry lower risks. “People need some ease” – the behaviors we're asking people to do have to be sustainable.
22/ @ 1:03:00: we discuss how things will change if we have partly effective vaccine in '21. Her worry: “I hope we don’t get duped into thinking, ‘oh great, there’s a vaccine, we can throw it all away.’” Even as we (hopefully) move toward "normal," sustainability will remain key.
23/ Fascinating session – again, here: tinyurl.com/y2to6y9y Next Thursday will be regular (non-Covid-focused) @UCSF Medicine Grand Rounds.

Then, Nov 5th: a special post-election Covid grand rounds. @ASlavitt & other special guests will talk Covid & the election. Can’t wait!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bob Wachter

Bob Wachter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bob_Wachter

22 Oct
Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 218

1/ Excellent @washingtonpost piece today on Operation Warp Speed, & its (likely) success in moving us from discovery of a new virus to having one or more safe & effective vaccines available in about a year, God willing. tinyurl.com/yybpgcat
2/ Yes, that’s really me quoted below, praising the Trump administration for OSW's success. Bestowing such praise was not easy, since I agree with @KamalaHarris that our overall Covid response may well be the greatest failure of any presidential administration in U.S. history.
3/ But on this one, the administration has gotten it right. While some will quibble w/ choices of which vaccines to bet on, the investments made seem sound – particularly the choice to offer funds to decrease the risk of the companies’ vaccine development process (“de-risking”)…
Read 25 tweets
15 Oct
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 211

Now 7 months into the U.S. pandemic and 3 weeks from the election, everybody is exhausted and overwhelmed. Everyone's new question seems to be, “are you optimistic or pessimistic?” The question is simple; the answer, of course, is complex.
2/ Today, I’ll start with the view from San Francisco – consumed by The Trump Show, it’s been a while since I presented our local data. I’ll then describe the scary surges elsewhere and add my take on the optimist/pessimist question.
3/ First, @UCSFHospitals, we have only 10 Covid patients in hospital & just 2 on vents, both lowest since May (Figure). Test positivity rate @UCSF is ~4% in patients w/ symptoms, 0.5% in asymptomatic pts. In Aug, these # 's were 10% / 1.5%, so a vast improvement in every metric.
Read 25 tweets
10 Oct
Just watched the @TuckerCarlson segment with Trump interview by @DrMarcSiegel. Takeaway: Trump looks good, his voice is strong, no visible shortness of breath, he's finishing sentences without stopping for air. Mental status and judgment seem unchanged from his usual. (1/9)
Siegel actually did a decent interview – asking questions testing recall, along with others that got at judgment and insight (latter included asking about lessons learned from this experience). I'm not a Trump fan but it's hard to make 25th Amendment case from what we saw. (2/9)
And, while Trump is still not completely out of the woods – there's still a small (<5%) chance of a significant setback – with a patient this stable 8 days into the illness, his most likely course is a relatively uneventful recovery. (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
9 Oct
1/ Covid (@UCSF) Chronicles, Day 205

It’s hard to believe that we first learned of Trump’s Covid diagnosis exactly one week ago tinyurl.com/yxq2vbv3. Here are a bunch of hot takes on today’s issues, which continue to move at hyper-speed.
2/ On Trump’s clinical status. Yesterday, his doc reported that Trump's vital signs were stable, including normal oxygen saturation w/o supplemental O2. Today’s videos show no obvious shortness of breath (he completes sentences without stopping for air): tinyurl.com/y3p9l8lh
3) Based on his @FoxBusiness phone-in today tinyurl.com/y5h5brpe, his mental status & judgment seem to be at his baseline (that's the standard we use). Whatever you think about Trump's mind, there’s no new evidence of lack of capacity to do his job based on Covid or meds.
Read 25 tweets
4 Oct
Impressions of today's Walter Reed presser:

a) Conley's mea culpa: “I was trying to reflect the upbeat attitude of the team. Didn’t want to give any information that would steer the course of his illness.” Trump's fingerprints.

But even so, today was only slightly better. (1/8)
b/ Biggest news is that T had 2 episodes of hypoxia (down to 93-94% O2 saturation), & Conley evaded whether sat was ever <90. "Never in low 80s" is all he offered.

c/ Re: Chest CT: "There were some expected findings but nothing of concern." What the hell does that mean?...(2/8)
...To be clear, the "expected findings" on a chest CT is NORMAL. If it was normal, he should say that. Anything else should have been described.

(The only semi-benign interpretation would be if the prez has a known chronic finding – like a benign nodule – that was seen)...(3/8)
Read 8 tweets
3 Oct
I’ve not yet seen report on whether Trump has received dexamethasone (steroids); we know he already got remdesivir (antiviral) & “cocktail” of monoclonal antibodies.

But steroids, the only drugs proven to lower Covid mortality, raise a complex set of issues. An explainer. 1/9
The key is the dynamics of the immune system in Covid: early on, damage is being done by the virus itself, so rapid treatment w/ an antiviral & other efforts to bolster the immune response make perfect sense (although “making sense” & “proven to work” are 2 different things). 2/9
But steroids act differently – they suppress the immune system. Why could that work? Because later in Covid, some of the harm is by damage caused by our own immune systems going haywire – attacking our bodies in a frenzied effort to kill the intruder tinyurl.com/yyra4qnd 3/9
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!